I liked seeing Jack, but I felt Daniel's role had no significance whatsoever. From archaeologist to spy extraodinaire, makes no sense really. It seemed like he was just there for the sake of having a familiar face on the show.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Old Faces
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by magictrick View PostI liked seeing Jack, but I felt Daniel's role had no significance whatsoever. From archaeologist to spy extraodinaire, makes no sense really. It seemed like he was just there for the sake of having a familiar face on the show.
Comment
-
Originally posted by magictrick View PostI liked seeing Jack, but I felt Daniel's role had no significance whatsoever. From archaeologist to spy extraodinaire, makes no sense really. It seemed like he was just there for the sake of having a familiar face on the show.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rsanchez View PostCan we get over the "Daniel is an archaeologist that makes him good for nothing" thing already? Realistically, I think Daniel stopped being strictly an archaeologist 10 years ago.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KEK View PostDaniel seemed like a completely different character
Comment
-
Originally posted by Replicator Todd View PostDefinitely, it really shows in Season 10 of SG1. Its why I say Daniel Jackson can do anything!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Major_Griff View PostIf/when the Stargate program becomes public knowledge, I could easily see Jack, Daniel, or Sam getting elected president. All they've done, people would vote for them in droves lolz.
Comment
Comment