I see Trump's been tweeting on Bernie lately, someone's scared!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Political Discussion Thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Spoiler:I don’t want to be human. I want to see gamma rays, I want to hear X-rays, and I want to smell dark matter. Do you see the absurdity of what I am? I can’t even express these things properly, because I have to—I have to conceptualize complex ideas in this stupid, limiting spoken language, but I know I want to reach out with something other than these prehensile paws, and feel the solar wind of a supernova flowing over me. I’m a machine, and I can know much more.
-
Originally posted by magi877 View Post
they should be focusing on how t beat trump in 2020, instead their actions in things like this only makes more americans hate them. they have no focus, and seemingly no concern, for those americans who voted for trump (i didn't btw)
Add to that the Democrats are very likely to torpedo themselves this time around, just as they did in 2016. If they run a socialist, they're dead. And the Kindergartner is going to be sure everyone knows what a socialist wants this time around. She and her ilk might just flip the House back, too.
Political witch hunts are the only way they hope to knock Trump out of office.
Their agenda doesn't resonate with much of the US, and they know it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chaka-Z0 View PostThat's why the US needs a true politician such as Bernie or AOC free of political cockblocks. Bernie's got his own team and all he just had to declare Democrat for bureaucracy sake lol.
Both sides are filled with careerist ghouls, as MG once said it's two sides of the same coin.
the main problem is that our Constitution, as currently written and amended, does not expressly forbid the people voting themselves largesse from the federal treasury, leading to the people voting for the politicians who promise them the largest payout from the federal treasury
if there could be an explicit amendment written into the Constitution that expressly prohibited this....I bet that would greatly minimize all this corruption
Comment
-
Originally posted by mad_gater View Postagreed on too many power-hungry people on both sides...disagree that the socialism the likes of Bernie and AOC want is the way to go...socialist dictatorships are even more corrupted than what we got now
the main problem is that our Constitution, as currently written and amended, does not expressly forbid the people voting themselves largesse from the federal treasury, leading to the people voting for the politicians who promise them the largest payout from the federal treasury
if there could be an explicit amendment written into the Constitution that expressly prohibited this....I bet that would greatly minimize all this corruption
But thanks for admitting you are not a fan of the constitution.sigpicALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yetThe truth isn't the truth
Comment
-
Originally posted by mad_gater View Postagreed on too many power-hungry people on both sides...disagree that the socialism the likes of Bernie and AOC want is the way to go...socialist dictatorships are even more corrupted than what we got now
the main problem is that our Constitution, as currently written and amended, does not expressly forbid the people voting themselves largesse from the federal treasury, leading to the people voting for the politicians who promise them the largest payout from the federal treasury
if there could be an explicit amendment written into the Constitution that expressly prohibited this....I bet that would greatly minimize all this corruption
I would like to see it brought back in the form of "you must be employed in or retired from the private sector, or police/fire/military in order to vote". The idea is that you must be pulling the cart, not riding in it to have a say in where it goes.
Comment
-
No sh*t it's not ethical, you're advocating to leave the power in the hands of the establishment. Look at a few demographic stats and you'll realize the US doesn't have many in the middle class you're in, either people are poor or rich.
You're literally saying half the population shouldn't vote, GTFO.Spoiler:I don’t want to be human. I want to see gamma rays, I want to hear X-rays, and I want to smell dark matter. Do you see the absurdity of what I am? I can’t even express these things properly, because I have to—I have to conceptualize complex ideas in this stupid, limiting spoken language, but I know I want to reach out with something other than these prehensile paws, and feel the solar wind of a supernova flowing over me. I’m a machine, and I can know much more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chaka-Z0 View PostNo sh*t it's not ethical, you're advocating to leave the power in the hands of the establishment. Look at a few demographic stats and you'll realize the US doesn't have many in the middle class you're in, either people are poor or rich.
You're literally saying half the population shouldn't vote, GTFO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Annoyed View PostThe original version of the Constitution did have a provision to take this into account, the requirement to be a landowner to vote. Granted, that's not ethical in today's society, where many people rent.
I would like to see it brought back in the form of "you must be employed in or retired from the private sector, or police/fire/military in order to vote". The idea is that you must be pulling the cart, not riding in it to have a say in where it goes.
Or are you just trying to disenfranchise people you don't like?
Damn dude, you are messed up.sigpicALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yetThe truth isn't the truth
Comment
-
Originally posted by Annoyed View PostRich or poor, I don't care. As long as you're supporting yourself and not on the taxpayer's dime, you should get a vote. As I said, if you want a say in where the cart goes, you should be pulling it, not riding on it.Originally posted by aretood2Jelgate is right
Comment
-
Originally posted by mad_gater View Postunless the retirees are supporting themselves without taxpayer involvement...which was possible before the advent of SS
Again, learn some dam* history.
Have you even READ the text of the new green deal?
Or is it just about cow farts planes and cars?sigpicALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yetThe truth isn't the truth
Comment
Comment