Originally posted by david3565
View Post
I was saying the Mark IX had such a large yield that its practicality on the battlefield was very limited. You're proposing a weapon with triple that yield. At that point, it may knock the orbiting platform out of orbit with the resulting shockwave.
The Soviets built a nuclear warhead with a one hundred megaton yield, but ended up dampening it to cut that yield in half, as the shockwave would have knocked the delivering bomber out of the air. All they ending up using the bomb for was the international equivalent of a pissing contest; they never actually fielded a warhead of that size.
The Soviets built a nuclear warhead with a one hundred megaton yield, but ended up dampening it to cut that yield in half, as the shockwave would have knocked the delivering bomber out of the air. All they ending up using the bomb for was the international equivalent of a pissing contest; they never actually fielded a warhead of that size.
With other systems, I would agree, but Deathgliders are like the Kalashnikovs of spaceships; cheap, plentiful, and somewhat disposable. And it isn't as if Earth has to keep obtaining her tech from the spoils of war. "We" can now freely trade with the Jaffa and other peoples who have capability of manufacturing more of them.
Comment