Star Trek Into Darkness : Spec/Ideas/News (SPOILERS)

[mr_kennedy]

back to topic do you guys think Kahn will be in this? i've heard rumours that Cumberbatch isnt meant to play him, idk could be kahn, could be one of kahns people, could even be gary mitchell who knows?

I'll grant you a teen soap but it was science fiction and yes the alien makes it science fiction. The show is never magical and leaves the science fiction genere of impossible. Highly impropable of course but must scifi tv is highly unlikely

Spoiler:

It does actually have magic in it s4 i think? and even later seasons with that witch zatanna or whatever her name is?

[DigiFluid]

Dude, re-read the last page or so of the thread

[Sp!der]

Oblivion, Pacific Rim, After Earth are all sci-fi movies at least for me but anyway I think Into Darkness although I still hate that name and they could choose a better one will be awesome ! I have watched the teaser at least five times now but decided not to watch anymore clips because I want to know nothing more about this movie than I already now, so see you guys in May ( at least in this thread )

[Teddybrown]

Just got back from watching The Hobbit and I got to see the Star Trek prequel.
One word, Wow!, if the films going to be like that, then it looks good!

[mi_guard]

Just got back from watching The Hobbit and I got to see the Star Trek prequel.
One word, Wow!, if the films going to be like that, then it looks good!

let's hope

[Teddybrown]

http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2825104384/tt1408101
Some new photos.

http://www.nextmovie.com/blog/dying-...into-darkness/
And a nice story...

[myhelix]

I was very disappointed by the new trailer.
I liked the reboot, I like the shows, but I am afraid that ST will drift in a Bond direction (and I think all the Craig Bonds are awful movies with replaceable characters and movie titles, for instance you can also name it Bourne, 96 Hours....)!

IMO in Star Trek, the main theme is discovery and trying to overcome those ridiculous trench wars. It´s about embracing something new and find common grounds.

But the trailer look like this weird mixture of revenge and destruction. It´s getting old, every movie begins with a big enemy that weasel his way in the heart of an organization/planet/family (insert whatever you like) and try to destroy it because he have a major problem with the main character. That was the exact Story of the last movie, was it?!

In the meantime planets get destroyed and friendships get proven and so on. Of course the special effects are very important and the cell the bad guy get imprisoned in looks like the one we capture Loki (the Avengers) and all the others.

[blueray]

Oblivion? After Earth? Pacific Rim? Is Man of Steel really science-fiction? I always saw Superman as fantasy given that the fictional science in the saga has no bearing on real world science. It only looks science-fiction, because he's an alien from another planet. There's science-fiction window dressing, but it's predominately a fantasy.

I've always seen it as sci-fi and fantasy its about an alien. there are some episodes that are science fiction such as the episode Relic (I believe its called), where Clark gets messages from his father who was on Earth in the 40's and the episode where Clark gets a call from Lana who was in the future. obviously the fantasy comes in when they are dealing with the stones in season 4. I personally liked this show, though I've only seen through some of season 9. It definitely started going downhill the longer it was on. but the earlier seasons are great.

[Anoobis]

Star Trek XI was already strange for me to watch with the coloring and the way Abrahams is cutting scenes, sometimes wild, sometimes with slo-mo, etc. It looked more like Matrix than Star Trek. Star Trek XII looks just like another Star Trek XI, just with a different enemy type and a different main character who is specially vulnerable to the enemy.

I am seriously considering not to watch this movie in the cinema, the first Star Trek movie ever since "Generations" (VII) I wouldn't have seen in the theatres and only get the Blueray release disk. For me, it's just not Star Trek anymore. It's something else Abrahams has turned Star Trek into. Star Trek for me, that's TNG episodes like when Data is being discussed who he belongs to or if he's more of a human being who can decide what to do on one's own. Star Trek for me, that's movies like "Voyage Home" or "First Contact", it's the spirit of Gene(ius) Roddenberry.

[Prowler]

Enjoyed XI, thought it was great. Will no doubt enjoy XII.

I loved TNG and most of the movies and found TOS amusing when I first saw it. Wasn't a fan of the other series'.

I will always remember what Gene did but I understand that the new movies need to be different if the reboot is to be successful. It needs to drag in a new audience but it also needs to attempt to keep the older audience happy. It kept me happy therefore it's a success in my eyes.

[Morbo]

is the first 9 minutes streaming online (legally) anywhere? I didn't get to see it in front of the hobbit.

[Lt.Colonel John Sheppard]

is the first 9 minutes streaming online (legally) anywhere? I didn't get to see it in front of the hobbit.

it's only on imax showings of the hobbit.

[Replicator Todd]

Yeah that darn fancy shmansy IMAX...I saw the Hobbit in 2D.

[Teddybrown]

Star Trek Into Darkness new featurette

[Teddybrown]

And new TV spot from Super Bowl