I agree with what's been said, every side of the story.
Parent's should be able to filter what their minors see on the internet. but that can be done with third party software or just stick the family computer in a public area. the government doesn't need to get involved.
Restrictions won't stop the most determined and therefore will only hurt the honest.
I also agree that any attempts to use the internet for child exploitation should be dealt with on a criminal level, but that Hilter quote does scare me. How far can you twist the definition of "child protection"?
Parent's should be able to filter what their minors see on the internet. but that can be done with third party software or just stick the family computer in a public area. the government doesn't need to get involved.
Restrictions won't stop the most determined and therefore will only hurt the honest.
I also agree that any attempts to use the internet for child exploitation should be dealt with on a criminal level, but that Hilter quote does scare me. How far can you twist the definition of "child protection"?
Comment