I'm sorry, but that was the worst episode of Stargate in its ~300 episode history. This episode pretty much took orbital mechanics, physics, etc. and threw it all out for the sake of a story that I called last week (Ooh, we're heading straight into a star and we're out of power. I wonder why the ship is going there?). I mean seriously. The last 15 minutes or so of that was especially sloppy and lazy writing. It's a star system, not a city block. Things aren't that close.
1. The heat from the hydrogen is certainly not enough to get a ship of that size moving like it does. Maybe if they we're grabbing it for fusion, but I would submit there are less... dramatic ways to recover hydrogen. The Ancients weren't stupid. Arrogant, but not stupid.
2. Upon its spectacular energy recovery at the star, it shows up in visual range of the shuttle? Space is a lot bigger than that. Especially if that planet was in the habitable zone. If it was in visual range at that point, there's absolutely no way turning back towards the planet would allow for a slingshot at the magnitude such that a ship that had an acceleration such that it could cover at least 20 million kilometers in minutes (assuming best case scenario small red dwarf star habitable zone distance) could be caught by the shuttle.
3. Coming back in for a landing, and firing manuevering thrusters to get the kind of delta v they got? I mean come on. Maneuvering thrusters are for... maneuvering. They typically generate only a small fraction of what a spacecraft's main engine generates.. and that's for our primitive spacecraft. Let alone a shuttle which can apparently fly through a solar system in a matter of hours.
I'm really trying to like this show. After SG-1 I owe any show with the name Stargate that much. And in fact I'll probably continue to watch the show regardless of the quality just because its got spaceships and a metal ring that takes people places. But I would like to remind TPTB that, while their new demographic may be mindless and technically uninclined, there are a large number of us in the community who are intelligent and hold advanced technical degrees. And in order to improve the quality of your product for us, I would ask that you promptly terminate the employment of your science adviser. Because he is clearly incompetent.
1. The heat from the hydrogen is certainly not enough to get a ship of that size moving like it does. Maybe if they we're grabbing it for fusion, but I would submit there are less... dramatic ways to recover hydrogen. The Ancients weren't stupid. Arrogant, but not stupid.
2. Upon its spectacular energy recovery at the star, it shows up in visual range of the shuttle? Space is a lot bigger than that. Especially if that planet was in the habitable zone. If it was in visual range at that point, there's absolutely no way turning back towards the planet would allow for a slingshot at the magnitude such that a ship that had an acceleration such that it could cover at least 20 million kilometers in minutes (assuming best case scenario small red dwarf star habitable zone distance) could be caught by the shuttle.
3. Coming back in for a landing, and firing manuevering thrusters to get the kind of delta v they got? I mean come on. Maneuvering thrusters are for... maneuvering. They typically generate only a small fraction of what a spacecraft's main engine generates.. and that's for our primitive spacecraft. Let alone a shuttle which can apparently fly through a solar system in a matter of hours.
I'm really trying to like this show. After SG-1 I owe any show with the name Stargate that much. And in fact I'll probably continue to watch the show regardless of the quality just because its got spaceships and a metal ring that takes people places. But I would like to remind TPTB that, while their new demographic may be mindless and technically uninclined, there are a large number of us in the community who are intelligent and hold advanced technical degrees. And in order to improve the quality of your product for us, I would ask that you promptly terminate the employment of your science adviser. Because he is clearly incompetent.
Comment