Originally posted by Twilight506
Originally posted by zuz
Hmmm, I don't get this. If Jack is a Home World Security Honcho, doesn't it mean that they are still in the same chain of command? I mean like this: Jack-Homeworld Security > Landry-SGC > Sam - SG-1?
Just a military ignorant here with no military experience whatsoever so I might completely misunderstand your AF rules...???
Just a military ignorant here with no military experience whatsoever so I might completely misunderstand your AF rules...???
Spoiler:
In S8, there did seem to be a military chain of command between Homeworld Security being led by Hammond and the SGC being led by Jack but it is unclear whether this chain of command between Homeworld Security and the SGC continues in S9.
In S9 with the increased involvement of the IOA, Landry seems somewhat less connected with Homeworld Security and it appears that HWS has become more of an oversight/coordination function for protecting Earth/the Stargate programme/Atlantis/the ship building programme rather than having a direct military link but nothing is made explicit.
So, you could either assume there is a chain of command or assume there is not based on the canon.
The second thing is that Jack's role on leaving the SGC has never been clear. He disappeared to Washington; Hammond seemingly retired (out of dress blues in The Fourth Horseman) so the assumption is that he succeeded Hammond and became the Head of Homeworld Security. He certainly seemed to have some say over personnel decisions; recruiting Landry and Lam to the SGC before he left, and agreeing to Mitchell's assignment to SG1 (Jack's involvement is discussed in Avalon) but whether this was part of the deal of his leaving - that he got some say in his successor and key positions or whether he has assignment authority in his new role is ambiguous - as his role in gtting Sam assigned to the SGC temporarily in Beachhead. It was also Landry not Jack who had to agree the funding with the Senate (although I seem to remember that Jack had offered to help out if there were problems) so again its unclear what Jack's role and authority are in terms of the SGC. Unless The Return made it explicit what Jack has been doing since he left the SGC (I haven't seen it yet), there is actually nothing in canon to confirm he did become Head of HWS.
In terms of whether Sam is currently in his chain of command (and the way I interpret the regs is that if Jack is in her chain of command at all not just as her commanding officer, the regs apply unless there is an exception made);
A) If you assume, Jack is Head of HWS but there is no chain of command from the SGC into HWS, then Sam is not in Jack's chain of command and the regs don't apply.
B) If you assume, there is a chain of command from the SGC to HWS but Jack is not Head of HWS but acting as Special Advisor to the President (or some other role), then Sam is not in Jack's chain of command and the regs don't apply.
C) If you assume there is no chain of command from the SGC into HWS and Jack is not Head of HWS, then Sam is definitely not in Jack's chain of command and the regs don't apply.
D) If you assume, there is a chain of command from the SGC to HWS, and Jack is Head of HWS, then Sam is definitely IN Jack's chain of command and the regs DO apply unless there was/is an exception in place.
Comment