Originally posted by majorsal
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sam Carter/Jack O'Neill Ship Appreciation Thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
I think our views of what AT thinks of ship are skewed by the magazines...I'll take what she says at cons are her true opinion...not what the magazines say.
after all...at GABIT when she held up Sam and Jack's dogtags, she said 'together as they should be'
or something along those lines anyway!
Comment
-
Originally posted by majorsali know.
it was a conversation with my shipper friend that really made it hit home for me. i can't remember her exact words, but it was basically this... (with me throwing in my own thoughts)
first few years: 'we can't have sam and jack get together when they're serving on the same team together. regs.'
last three or so years: 'we can't have sam and jack get together when they're serving on the same team *and* base together. regs.'
so, the beginning of season 9 saw sam and jack NOT serving on the same team and NOT serving on the same base. so why aren't they together? or are they?
so what was their basic excuse (regs) is NOT an issue anymore, so if they're not going to do s/j ship... were we just strung along?
sally
Hi eveyone.
I wonder.....hmmm.......Spoiler:I wonder with the lack of Jack's name even being mentioned (nothing since Landry on the phone with him) is because of a contractual agreement between RDA and TPTB. Maybe they have to pay him everytime his name is mentioned.
Last edited by SG1Poz; 21 December 2005, 05:58 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ses110I can give you the reason.TPTB are afraid of Anti-Shippers.TPTB should have told everyone there will always be Sam/Jack Ship and we will have episodes that deal with the Sam/Jack Ship from time to time.JM has no problems telling Shippers there will be no Sam/Jack now.TPTB do not fear Shippers because they know too many Shippers are not ready to stop watching this Show.
sallysally
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by STARGATE7777I think that despite TPTB's denial that they listen and respond to fans that this is indeed what happened. In season 7, with the decrease in RDA's time and the pressure to be more Daniel centric ( is that a word?) they felt compelled to write the ship less obvious and more in a way that was open to interpretation. At the same time, all Sam and Jack as a couple or as individuals became, to some fans, a reason for anything and everything that ailed in the show. What we have now is simply the end result of something that gradually happened. I think they view the Sam and Jack storyline the same way as they view the Gould, Thor, Mayborne,etc. --it's over and resolved, let's move on. I don't know if they truly believe the show is still good or they just continue to say it is. I guess we'll all find out after the 200th episode. Sam, in season 9, is like everyone else. They have no prior knowledge of what has happened the past 8 years so they can have her act anyway they please. Scary, but I'm afraid true.
remember how the ptb wanted to rename stargate sg1 into 'stargate command'? well, i think it IS 'stargate command'.
maybe some of the fans problems is we thought this show was starring sam, daniel, and teal'c, with the new ppl being added to 'fit in' to the already established show and cast.
what i think we've really got is a show starring vala and mitchell, with sam, teal'c, and daniel being 'fit in' to this show's storylines and cast.
wish i would have known that beforehand (would have saved me the heartache of wanting what's never to be).
sally *thumbs down*sally
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by STARGATE7777I know this is a Sam and Jack thread but I MISS RDA!!!. My daughter and I watched the first 5 minutes of some season 9 episode - it was either change the channel or fall asleep. Anyway, after the introduction of the actors and no RDA she said ---This is just wrong... My sentiments exactly.
i'm about to make my annual rda calendar for 2006. i take a cheapie calendar (left in our mailbox by some real estate broker) and tape rda/jack pics over the others. there's my rda calendar. *sighs*
sallysally
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by sueKayhmm...we should all write to TPTB demanding the exact same little scenario...
what do you all think?
how about 'asking' for it?
sue, i've tried MULTIPLE times to get shippers fired up to write (not here), but... without a large concensus, i can't think we'd make much of an impression.
(i still write my postcards, though)
sallysally
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by SG1Pozde-lurking....
Hi eveyone.
I wonder.....hmmm.......Spoiler:I wonder with the lack of Jack's name even being mentioned (nothing since Landry on the phone with him) is because of a contractual agreement between RDA and TPTB. Maybe they have to pay him everytime his name is mentioned.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...rwareZ-031.gif- Mary
SG1 needs it's Fifth Man - Why should we settle for less? Bring back Jonas Quinn!
Jack O'Neill would die for any member of his team. But there's only one he'd live for: Samantha Carter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Buc252I see what you're saying, Poz, but I think this is highly unlikely. They definitely could have this kind of agreement for the use of Rick's name, but Jack, Jack O'neill, Colonel O'Neill, etc, is fully the property of the show. And even if there was such a thing with "Jack O'Neill," I doubt you could apply it to just saying "Jack." It's too common a name.
Comment
-
look: http://wallpapersbebesokar.free.fr/Mr&Mrs.jpg
it came from here: http://forum.gateworld.net/showpost....&postcount=612
enjoy.
sallysally
sigpic
Comment
Comment