Yeah kinf like a one sided electic stick thing them robots had in Star Wars ep 3 with General Greivous
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Ultimate Furling Discussion Thread
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
http://www.stargateworlds.com/screenviewer.php?id=51
Have a look at this one, it looks like its holding an axe crossed with a P90, jack'd be proud
Comment
-
Originally posted by WraithWarriorhttp://www.stargateworlds.com/screenviewer.php?id=51
Have a look at this one, it looks like its holding an axe crossed with a P90, jack'd be proud
Comment
-
Originally posted by The ProphetIs it me, or does that creature look like a Stereotypical Hun/Russian? -Large, Broad Shoulders, Wears Fur, Armour, Looks Angry, Helmet, looks pretty dangerous & agressive, etc.
Comment
-
If we ever do see the Furlings, I want them to be completely and utterly alien...even to the point that they have to use CGI to do it. I'm getting sick of seeing only humans (or human-looking aliens) everywhere. The only aliens we ever see are Goa'uld, Asgard, and Wraith (and the Wraith are part human). I want to see an alien (other than the Asgard) that has no genetic connection to humans at all, and is completely alien.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Major TylerIf we ever do see the Furlings, I want them to be completely and utterly alien...even to the point that they have to use CGI to do it. I'm getting sick of seeing only humans (or human-looking aliens) everywhere. The only aliens we ever see are Goa'uld, Asgard, and Wraith (and the Wraith are part human). I want to see an alien (other than the Asgard) that has no genetic connection to humans at all, and is completely alien.My Depth Is Immaterial To This Conversation...
Comment
-
Its quite simple, O'Neill has been the one who refers to them as "those cute little guys".
Now O'Neill has had the AROK downloaded in to his head, twice. The first time he used this knowledge to find the Asgard. So this means that there was info on the Asgard in the AROK. So there must have been info on the Furlings to.
So it could be that in O'Neill's subconsensus is a basic image of a Furling, and he just thinks its his imaganation.Last edited by JedI Master of the Gate; 20 March 2006, 04:24 PM.The Doctor: [leafing through a teen magazine] That won't last. He's gay and she's an alien.
Carter: You saying that it could be boobytraped?
Teal'C: Booby?
May the Force Be With You
Comment
-
Honestly I think it's the simpsons side of his subconcious coming up with the cute and furry interpritation... I seem to recall a short dialog between him and Carter about it where he defended his position on the appearance of Furlings, but I can't remember exactly or what ep it was from...~Draco Astreus
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lord ShivaUm, and it has nothing to do with their name being the "Fur" lings, right?Equality is not a concept. It's not something we should be striving for. It's a necessity. Equality is like gravity. We need it to stand on this earth as men and women. And the misogyny that is in every culture is not a true part of the human condition. It is life out of balance, and that imbalance is sucking something out of the soul of every man and woman who is confronted with it.
- Joss Whedon - Equality Now
Comment
-
Originally posted by PtahTheCreationGodYup, and that is exactly what Jack said, it has nothing to do with the Ancient knowledge as it was ALL removed, and he only had it once when he made that connection back in S6The Doctor: [leafing through a teen magazine] That won't last. He's gay and she's an alien.
Carter: You saying that it could be boobytraped?
Teal'C: Booby?
May the Force Be With You
Comment
-
Originally posted by JedI Master of the GateBut whats to say that a little bit of info didn't remain in his head, like when Daniel acsended, he gained all the knowledge that a AROK would have givin him, then became humen, but yet a great deal of the info was left in his subconsensus.
=0)
Comment
-
I tend to agree with him. The very name "Furling" brings to mind memories of soft, cute teddy bears from when I was 3.Yes, I really do look like (a younger) Daniel. Don't believe me? Look for yourself.
Hey, Mitchell! You want a turn?
Comment
Comment