I'm actually really hoping they don't. One District 9 is a peculiarity, something unique and unusual. It was made largely documentary-style, detailing a series of events leading up to the 'present' of the end of the film and that's what made it so identifiable. Making a sequel, presumably dealing with Christopher, seems to me would end up as just another science fiction movie. Or else, it would be duplicating the style of D9 and be nothing new. In either case, I don't think I want to see a sequel.
I should probably also say that I liked Blair Witch and never saw its sequels, and I loved 28 Days Later and refuse to see 28 Weeks Later; for much the same reasons as why I suspect a District 9 sequel won't be anything to write home about. That's just my thoughts anyway.
Has anyone taken the time to see the short film (Alive in Joburg) that District 9 was based on? It's only 5 minutes long, and it's actually really quite good.
I should probably also say that I liked Blair Witch and never saw its sequels, and I loved 28 Days Later and refuse to see 28 Weeks Later; for much the same reasons as why I suspect a District 9 sequel won't be anything to write home about. That's just my thoughts anyway.
Has anyone taken the time to see the short film (Alive in Joburg) that District 9 was based on? It's only 5 minutes long, and it's actually really quite good.
Comment