Huginn,
I think you hit the nail on the head as far as analyzing the episode.
As far as DNA for everyone, there's no reason to assume it would take a
huge amount of space. Take passwords. A typical password scheme takes
the password, and munges it down to a 32-bit number. The odds of two
passwords yielding the same 32-bit number are very small, unless the
munging algorithm is flawed.
To store a DNA "checksum", one would do a DNA analysis technique like
electrophoresis (the usual technique used to see if you're related to
someone, or if you're DNA matches DNA found at a crime scene).
Standardize such a test so that it results in the same pattern every
time for the same DNA. Record certain parameters, and use those to
generate a list of numbers that can be munged into a
32bit/64bit/whatever number, one for each person in the military.
Another example of this is fingerprint ID. No computer system in the
world would be able to store bitmap images of every criminal's
fingerprints (or at least no computer in the late 80's and early 90's,
back when computer fingerprinting started), yet using analysis, and
storing a few numbers per print, one can fit it into a reasonable
space. Many crimes were solved using such techniques.
My point is that a DNA match could be found for Bulldog w/o requiring
anything more than what we have today and w/o a huge amount of storage.
Storing even 100 bytes per person, and assuming 10 million people, you
only need 1 gigabyte of space. Compare that to the 500-700gig hard
drives found today. Heck, a CD is 6/10ths that size.
Thus I argue that holding this against the show isn't really fair in
this case.
I think you hit the nail on the head as far as analyzing the episode.
As far as DNA for everyone, there's no reason to assume it would take a
huge amount of space. Take passwords. A typical password scheme takes
the password, and munges it down to a 32-bit number. The odds of two
passwords yielding the same 32-bit number are very small, unless the
munging algorithm is flawed.
To store a DNA "checksum", one would do a DNA analysis technique like
electrophoresis (the usual technique used to see if you're related to
someone, or if you're DNA matches DNA found at a crime scene).
Standardize such a test so that it results in the same pattern every
time for the same DNA. Record certain parameters, and use those to
generate a list of numbers that can be munged into a
32bit/64bit/whatever number, one for each person in the military.
Another example of this is fingerprint ID. No computer system in the
world would be able to store bitmap images of every criminal's
fingerprints (or at least no computer in the late 80's and early 90's,
back when computer fingerprinting started), yet using analysis, and
storing a few numbers per print, one can fit it into a reasonable
space. Many crimes were solved using such techniques.
My point is that a DNA match could be found for Bulldog w/o requiring
anything more than what we have today and w/o a huge amount of storage.
Storing even 100 bytes per person, and assuming 10 million people, you
only need 1 gigabyte of space. Compare that to the 500-700gig hard
drives found today. Heck, a CD is 6/10ths that size.
Thus I argue that holding this against the show isn't really fair in
this case.
Comment