Originally posted by Gatefan1976
View Post
Your argument is no different than Trumps "It's not a ban, it's a ban" argument. On paper, it's not a Muslim ban, but the intent of it was to ban Muslims so that betrays its true nature. By the letter of the Law, Christians aren't being targeted. But by actions of both government officials and activists, they are. If the Washington State Attorney General knew about a Muslim owner who did the same and didn't take action, then that would be a violation of the equal protection clause. Because his action would be discriminatory. It'd be no different than a cop only pulling over black people for speeding but never pulling over white people for speeding.
If it's what you want, it's small government, see the example of staying out of peoples rights by telling woman weather they can have an abortion.
Government so small it can fit...............................
Government so small it can fit...............................
Comment