Yeah. Another reason why Universe haters should think twice. The old Stargate shows, as much as we all loved them, were full of nonsense like this: just to keep the plot going, credibility was stretched far beyond reasonable levels.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What do you think is better technology? Atlantis or Destiny?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
The ship is intelligent, I tell you!
I've been arguing that, natyanayaki. 'Air' pt 3 was acceptable coincidence but 'Time' was simply far too... coincidental to be unintentional. There was a greater intelligence at work, one that has access to information about upcoming planets and systems and, it seems, crew bioscans.sigpic
More fun @ Spoofgate!
Comment
-
Originally posted by nx01a View PostThe ship is intelligent, I tell you!
I've been arguing that, natyanayaki. 'Air' pt 3 was acceptable coincidence but 'Time' was simply far too... coincidental to be unintentional. There was a greater intelligence at work, one that has access to information about upcoming planets and systems and, it seems, crew bioscans.
So...
1. Ship detects water-borne badness in the crew.
2. Ship scans everything it knows for a cure.
3. Ship doesn't mention anything whatsoever about NastyScreechyVenomThings or Solar Flare but...
4. Relies on the extremely unpredictable nature of the flares to effect the loop.
5. Assumes some people will survive long enough to send a message back.
6. Assumes people will figure it out in time anyway.
So that's what happened?
If Destiny were that smart, and did identify the creatures as a cure (I don't even accept Destiny knows the crew got sick anyway), then why the hell didn't the ship inform the crew about the creatures?Mongoletsi is bigger than hip...hop...
Comment
-
Anyyyyyway...
Destiny is good at being an automated deep-space probeshipthing.
Atlantis is good at being a massive Winnebago with decent defensive capabilities.
Horses for courses...
“The Eurofighter is both agile and sophisticated, but is still difficult to compare to the F/A-22 Raptor. They are different kinds of airplanes to start with; it's like asking us to compare a NASCAR car with a Formula One car. They are both exciting in different ways, but they are designed for different levels of performance." - Link .. capiche?
Personally I prefer Destiny as an object of wonder. It just looks great and seems possessed of a sheer bloody-mindedness with many secrets yet untold* - so I guess we have to say Destiny is a "she" then
* wereas with SGA, I got bored of all these miraculous devices appearing during the latest "search of the old submerged under level sub section outer hidden pier landing section"Mongoletsi is bigger than hip...hop...
Comment
-
Originally posted by thekillman View Posti think that in battle, Destiny does not even have a fair chance of winning. even when in pristine condition.
Atlantis is FAR more advanced.
Comment
-
Omygawd, Atlantis, hands-down. They've got lightbulbs! Cool force field dome that will keep gigantic alien pigeon droppings from destroying the balconies...
But seriously, what neat-o keen technology does Destiny have? Hovering bowling balls? That's about it. It's FTL technology seems no different than hyperdrive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael Jansky View PostBy better, I mean in its overall usefulness. What seems as a more elegant solution for the functions the constructs need to perform? (Okay, one is a ship, one a flying city, but anyway.)
Personally, to me the Destiny seems much more cleverly built. With all the technology available when Atlantis was built and the same resourcefulness used in the construction of Destiny, Atlantis could have some more elegant solutions than it has.
But seriously, what neat-o keen technology does Destiny have? Hovering bowling balls? That's about it. It's FTL technology seems no different than hyperdrive.
Comment
-
Actually, Atlantis wins this one. Let's not forget, the Expedition has tried to use Atlantis for something it was not meant for. Atlantis serves two purposes- large-scale transport and defensive city. It is not a traditional warship. Destiny, however, is supposedly a long-term exploration vessel which, despite its durability, has many worn out metals. Considering the fact that Wraith and Lantean vessels have both survived for several thousand years, the materials that comprise the Destiny are rather primitive. Why isn't the Destiny comprised of naquadah, for example? Now, one could ask why Atlantis isn't made from naquadah, but let's face it, the city is more capable of filling its role than the Destiny is.Never, never, never believe any war will be smooth or easy...
... or that any man can measure the tides and hurricanes he will
encounter on the strange journey.
Spoiler:
2 Cor. 10:3-5
3 For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh:
4 (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds; )
5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
Comment
Comment