Third SG-1 movie ("Stargate Revolution") Ship Free hopes/speculation/ideas

[LtColCarter]

So what if he is the leader of SG-1? TPTB have already demonstrated that they can and will replace a leader for no reason at all Personally I think he is a lousy leader and won't miss him at all if he's not there.

Lousy leader? When SG1 was on...he had noone to lead. Sam was the same rank...and Teal'c and Daniel weren't military! So, how can you have an accurrate view of his leadership abilities??

[suse]

No, he was the leader of SG-1 when Continuum ended. That means nothing right now. Things change without warning.

Kinda like Sam was the leader in S8 and wasn't in S9.

<<whistles innocently>>

Personally, I'd be shocked if he wasn't in it. Whether I'd be happy about it is another story all together.

suse

[Iawen]

No, he was the leader of SG-1 when Continuum ended. That means nothing right now. Things change without warning.

Kinda like Sam was the leader in S8 and wasn't in S9.

<<whistles innocently>>

Personally, I'd be shocked if he wasn't in it. Whether I'd be happy about it is another story all together.

suse

Okay, that's true. I'd like to think they wouldn't change leadership between movies and not give him a proper send off. (My preference is for them not to send him off at all.)

[suse]

Lousy leader? When SG1 was on...he had noone to lead. Sam was the same rank...and Teal'c and Daniel weren't military! So, how can you have an accurrate view of his leadership abilities??

Funny how Sam and Jack could both lead 'the civilians' but Mitchell couldn't. And whether Sam had the same rank is immaterial, someone (not someonesis supposed to lead.

Before this spins totally out of control...

I was just pointing out that not all would be happy/hope that Mitchell was in the movie. Quite the opposite for that matter.

suse

[majorsal]

i'm going to be very disappointed if word isn't given at comic con about the 3rd sg1 movie (and for the atlantis fans, their 1st movie).

mgm, movie info PLEASE.

[Iawen]

Funny how Sam and Jack could both lead 'the civilians' but Mitchell couldn't. And whether Sam had the same rank is immaterial, someone (not someonesis supposed to lead.

Before this spins totally out of control...

I was just pointing out that not all would be happy/hope that Mitchell was in the movie. Quite the opposite for that matter.

suse

I don't think it was that Mitchell COULDN'T lead them; the dynamic was different when he came in and he took a different approach to the team than Carter and Jack did.

Well we're all entitled to our own opinions. TPTB have no hope in pleasing all of us, so they should just aim to make a good movie with a good story and good characters.

[suse]

Okay, that's true. I'd like to think they wouldn't change leadership between movies and not give him a proper send off. (My preference is for them not to send him off at all.)

OT:

Spoiler:

Like Jack's sendoff? Like Hammond's sendoff? At least Jonas got to say goodbye. I could argue about the reasoning that Sam was sent to Area 51 in S9, but that's mucho off topic. She didn't get a sendoff either, btw. Just replaced, then demoted.

I think it would be in keeping with how tptb change leadership. It's what they have always done.

suse

[Khentkawes]

I will second suse's "Before this spins out of control..." sentiment.

We all know that some people want Mitchell in the third movie and some people don't. It's not any different than some people wanting Vala or Sam/Jack ship and other people not wanting those things.

So can we please allow people to express their "hopes/speculation/ideas" without criticizing their opinions every single time? We already went through this two pages ago. *big sigh*

[Iawen]

OT:

Spoiler:

Like Jack's sendoff? Like Hammond's sendoff? At least Jonas got to say goodbye. I could argue about the reasoning that Sam was sent to Area 51 in S9, but that's mucho off topic. She didn't get a sendoff either, btw. Just replaced, then demoted.

I think it would be in keeping with how tptb change leadership. It's what they have always done.

suse

Spoiler:

I agree about Jack and Hammond's send-offs, though Hammond got a little bit of one, but that's why I don't want Mitchell to go out that way. At least Jack and Hammond were seen in episodes past that; now that we're in movie-only format, we'd never see Mitchell again.

I will second suse's "Before this spins out of control..." sentiment.

We all know that some people want Mitchell in the third movie and some people don't. It's not any different than some people wanting Vala or Sam/Jack ship and other people not wanting those things.

So can we please allow people to express their "hopes/speculation/ideas" without criticizing them every single time? We already went through this two pages ago. *big sigh*

I'm sorry; I wasn't trying to criticise anyone but respectfully say my own opinion. I know I was continuing the discussion and this isn't really the proper thread for debating that issue.

[RealmOfX]

I will second suse's "Before this spins out of control..." sentiment.

We all know that some people want Mitchell in the third movie and some people don't. It's not any different than some people wanting Vala or Sam/Jack ship and other people not wanting those things.

So can we please allow people to express their "hopes/speculation/ideas" without criticizing them every single time? We already went through this two pages ago. *big sigh*

<even bigger sigh> I think you need to go back and re read those posts - no one crticised anyone for having an opinion, people merely expressed their own opinions and in some cases pointed out the established precedence of TPTB for doing precisely what some posters were reasoning as to what couldn't/shouldn't be done.

BTW if you are having a problem with what people are posting then report them.

[Khentkawes]

I'm sorry; I wasn't trying to criticise anyone but respectfully say my own opinion. I know I was continuing the discussion and this isn't really the proper thread for debating that issue.

No worries, and no harm done.

This thread's just had a history of off-topic-ness when we all get into arguing with other people's "hopes" for the third movie.

I personally agree with everyone who's hoping we'll learn something new from comic con. It would be nice to have some more concrete information instead of the vague info we've been given.

[the fifth man]

No worries, and no harm done.

This thread's just had a history of off-topic-ness when we all get into arguing with other people's "hopes" for the third movie.

I personally agree with everyone who's hoping we'll learn something new from comic con. It would be nice to have some more concrete information instead of the vague info we've been given.

Yeah, because this not knowing is driving some of us crazy. Myself included.

[flynn1959]

No, he was the leader of SG-1 when Continuum ended. That means nothing right now. Things change without warning.

Kinda like Sam was the leader in S8 and wasn't in S9.

<<whistles innocently>>

Personally, I'd be shocked if he wasn't in it. Whether I'd be happy about it is another story all together.

suse

That's true, they could easily explain him away, but why should they when he has many fans? He should be there .IMO. As for Sam being the leader in S8 as has already been mentioned she had no one to lead. Neither Daniel nor Teal'c are military so she was kinda only in charge of herself!

[SGFerrit]

I disagree with that. Although there may not have been an official line of command in SG-1 then, they would still follow her lead and respect her position, and if she told them to do something they would. They aren't rebellious children, after all... They're supposed to be professionals.

[Inthenite42]

I think they might actually want to try having the Wraith in there. It would throw a curveball and mix it up a bit between SGA and SG1. Might be a little off though since the Wraith reside only in the Pegasus Galaxy ( I believe).