Daniel Jackson/Vala Mal Doran Ship/Discussion/Appreciation Thread

[Rac80]

It's hard to write smut when you are blushing... beleive me I have tried. Doesn't work at all! I prefer writing the hints and the feelings myself... a heavy petting or necking session can be quite steamy! atleast when i write..,...

[LC_]

Well, I enjoy smut and the sexy, sensual. I enjoy Rach's sexy, sensual stuff as much as I enjoy LC's or Mag's smut.

I've only been brave enough to write smut on one occasion. I might try again in the future, but hard telling.

HEY!...I resemble that remark....I write fully realized adult scenes that take place inside a long-term committed relationship...I mean really, I ask you is this:

"Something between a growl and a groan came out of Daniel’s mouth...."

oh wait...yeah...that excerpt is rather intense...

umm...okay...what about this:

"To equate the sight of his chest rubbing against..."

no, never mind...that's rather raunchy too...

'K...smut it is...

[Everlovin]

HEY!...I resemble that remark....I write fully realized adult scenes that take place inside a long-term committed relationship...I mean really, I ask you is this:

"Something between a growl and a groan came out of Daniel’s mouth...."

oh wait...yeah...that excerpt is rather intense...

umm...okay...what about this:

"To equate the sight of his chest rubbing against..."

no, never mind...that's rather raunchy too...

'K...smut it is...

Smut doesn't have to be Plot What Plot. In fact, I prefer some plot otherwise, it's just . . . why? To some extent, I think that the show - especially SG-1 not SGA with my ships - have provided that plot, but still. . .

[sg-daniel]

ya beat me to it. feel free to pimp the stories! The seduction of Daniel jackson- chapter 9 enjoy.

yayyyyyyyyyyy just read and love it, mhh what a nice way to wake up
also i have to agree with the others, i love smut

[Rac80]

yayyyyyyyyyyy just read and love it, mhh what a nice way to wake up
also i have to agree with the others, i love smut

LOL I will leave the smut to the "experts"
now LC none of that sounded too smutty... I write like that...just not the more... uhm, errr....shall we say descriptive parts.

[LC_]

now LC none of that sounded too smutty... I write like that...just not the more... uhm, errr....shall we say descriptive parts.

Well ya know I was thinking that so far your 'mature' moments didn't seem to terribly different from mine but then you're probably not referring to something like this are you:

"Without breaking eye contact with her, he slid his hand off her ass, over the curve of her hip, and reached between their bodies to grasp himself."

[Everlovin]

Yep that seems to be the case..

It's explained here..

http://forum.gateworld.net/showpost....postcount=8635

Thought you might be interested. They're enforcing the size of the whole sig now.

[poundpuppy29]

Hello Fruitcakes






I am not happy about the sig thing because now I have to redo mine again

[Everlovin]

I hear you, Erika! I had 70 some odd to resize and there are several that I want to redo because I had a whole poem or something that you can't read anymore.

[Rac80]

Well ya know I was thinking that so far your 'mature' moments didn't seem to terribly different from mine but then you're probably not referring to something like this are you:

"Without breaking eye contact with her, he slid his hand off her ass, over the curve of her hip, and reached between their bodies to grasp himself."

*blushes* yep that i what I mean by the more mature stuff.

oh gee how do I find if my sigs are too many pixels?

[Everlovin]

*blushes* yep that i what I mean by the more mature stuff.

oh gee how do I find if my sigs are too many pixels?

I still see all of your sig so I guess your good!

[CaramelMonkey]

I think the limits are 700x200...not sure though.

[sg-daniel]

yes it is

[Tonttu]

I think the limits are 700x200...not sure though.

http://forum.gateworld.net/faq.php?f...s#faq_sigrules

4. Your signature's width must not be so wide that it stretches beyond the forum template -- about 700 pixels is the maximum width. It also may not be more than about 200 pixels (two inches) tall, in total. Remember, less is more! Your signature shouldn't dominate your post.

As a trade-off, I've set the actual signature limit to 250 pixels. This is not the new "rule" -- it is overflow space which you may use, if you use it responsibly. We still encourage people not to over 200 pixels. The rule for sig height has always been "about 200 pixels," so this extra space is meant to accommodate the "about."

Still it doesn't say the exact width so I decided to find out and the exact width seems to be 736 pixels

Spoiler:

[CaramelMonkey]

Oh yay! I got it right! Hahha. I feel smart.