Hello there,
Just listened to the "Faith" podcast, and as usual I really enjoyed the discussion. However, I was disappointed that there wasn't more discussion of the HUGE ethical question raised in this episode. Here's some of what I wrote in another thread:
It's basically a question of the individual's liberties versus the collective's probability of survival.
Of course, you guys have a limited amount of time to work with, so it's understandable that not everything can be discussed!
I'd also like to say that I'm thrilled that SGU is willing to ask these big questions! I think it makes for much more interesting sci-fi, and much more interesting TV in general!
Thanks for all your hard work, guys!! Love the site and love the podcasts!!
Just listened to the "Faith" podcast, and as usual I really enjoyed the discussion. However, I was disappointed that there wasn't more discussion of the HUGE ethical question raised in this episode. Here's some of what I wrote in another thread:
REALLY interesting ethical question raised regarding whether precedence is to be placed on individual liberties or the welfare of the collective. Does the freedom of the individual to choose trump the collective's need for survival, or vice versa? Add to that the uncertainty element and you have a very intriguing ethical connundrum. Surely, the collective's chances of survival would be lessened with the loss of a medic, pilot and highly qualified scientists; but at the same time, the collective's survival is not guaranteed by their presence either (nor is their demise guaranteed by their loss). Further still, it is more than just a question of liberty versus survival, because those chosing to stay behind were doing so out of a desire to survive as well. So there's the following additional layer to the problem: the few versus the many. Do you potentially endanger everyone by allowing the separation of the crew (where those on the planet may have a better chance of survival, but not a necessary one, and those on the ship will have a lessened chance of survival), or do you, once again, potentially endanger everyone by keeping everyone aboard (where, now, all have a sort of 'average' chance of survival between the poles in the previous case, but again, won't necessarily survive)
Of course, you guys have a limited amount of time to work with, so it's understandable that not everything can be discussed!
I'd also like to say that I'm thrilled that SGU is willing to ask these big questions! I think it makes for much more interesting sci-fi, and much more interesting TV in general!
Thanks for all your hard work, guys!! Love the site and love the podcasts!!
Comment