Originally posted by Callista
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Creation Con: Aug 24-26, 2007 (Stargate actors)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Callista View PostLOL! Tracy Jane was kind enough to explain that to me soon after my joining Gateworld. (I believe it was in the "Pantsgate SG-1" thread )
Comment
-
Originally posted by Arctic Goddess View PostOk...someone please PM me and tell me what pants means in Britain. I wear a halo all the time, 'cause I'm so sweet and innocent. Really....It's true....Why doesn't anyone believe me?sigpicawesome siggie courtesy of jasminaGo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Arctic Goddess View PostOk...someone please PM me and tell me what pants means in Britain. I wear a halo all the time, 'cause I'm so sweet and innocent. Really....It's true....Why doesn't anyone believe me?
Sweet and innocent my left butt cheek......This coming from the one who talked a certain Cliff Simon into embarrassing me up on stage in Burbank last year...... I DON'T BELIEVE YOU!!!!Last edited by Chelle; 10 September 2007, 06:45 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ashtoreth View PostWhen I refer to pants, I am usually referring to undies. That's what my parents who are British (We are Welsh - I was born there) have always called them, what we wear on the outside are trousers or slacks.
Ashtorethsigpicawesome siggie courtesy of jasminaGo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Arctic Goddess View PostOk...someone please PM me and tell me what pants means in Britain. I wear a halo all the time, 'cause I'm so sweet and innocent. Really....It's true....Why doesn't anyone believe me?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Callista View PostWow. Someone asked him if they packed his pants. That seems a bit impertinent.
Michael is definitely smaller then he looks on TV. He looks great but on TV his legs definitely look more like a body builders shape and tone and they sure didn't look that way at the convention. They looked quite nice and no one was complaining!
Originally posted by elephantgirlImpertinent it might have been, but it was hilarious, believe me!sigpic
www.facebook.com/pages/DavidNyklFans/402742713123717
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rosehawk View PostIt may have seemed impertinent but I don't think the person asking the question meant for it to come out the way it did.
Michael is definitely smaller then he looks on TV. He looks great but on TV his legs definitely look more like a body builders shape and tone and they sure didn't look that way at the convention. They looked quite nice and no one was complaining!
Yeah, it was funny. Michaels reaction to the question was priceless and so was the audiences reaction.sigpicawesome siggie courtesy of jasminaGo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rosehawk View PostIt may have seemed impertinent but I don't think the person asking the question meant for it to come out the way it did.
Michael is definitely smaller then he looks on TV. He looks great but on TV his legs definitely look more like a body builders shape and tone and they sure didn't look that way at the convention. They looked quite nice and no one was complaining!
Yeah, it was funny. Michaels reaction to the question was priceless and so was the audiences reaction.
I loved his response, though ... "Did they pack my pants? No ... maybe if they had, we wouldn't have been canceled."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daniel's shadow View PostDeeds it's all the pants isn't it.
Indeed.........and I've got The Alterations Kit to prove it.....
Deeds xx
Comment
-
Originally posted by ~Sarah~ View PostHe's toned, but he still has a bit of chicken legs.. Still hot though....
Comment
Comment