Originally posted by SGAFan
View Post
ITA totally freaking agree. SGA WAS thrown under the bus for SGU. Its stupid and you're right. They completely jumped the gun cancelling after 5. Did the actors have 6 year contracts? I couldn't remember.
The reason why it shocked me so much as I assumed SGA would be around for at least one season of SGU as a lead in show like they did with SG1 and season 1 of Atlantis.
So let me see if I have this straight. Kill the successful show to start a new one, then run that new, unproven show with no lead in to help it get a running start.... yeah. I see that logic.
Maybe they think Sanctuary will be the lead in , in which case they're smoking crack. (sorry to be blunt but I"m beyond being nice). I'm going to give Sanctury a try too, mostly out of curiosity, but it also, at this point is totally new and unproven and, frankly, I'm not overly optomistic about it. *sigh*
This is a great plan if you want to mess up the franchise. In which case (at the risk of sounding like Rodney) fabulous job, you're right on track.
The reason why it shocked me so much as I assumed SGA would be around for at least one season of SGU as a lead in show like they did with SG1 and season 1 of Atlantis.
So let me see if I have this straight. Kill the successful show to start a new one, then run that new, unproven show with no lead in to help it get a running start.... yeah. I see that logic.
Maybe they think Sanctuary will be the lead in , in which case they're smoking crack. (sorry to be blunt but I"m beyond being nice). I'm going to give Sanctury a try too, mostly out of curiosity, but it also, at this point is totally new and unproven and, frankly, I'm not overly optomistic about it. *sigh*
This is a great plan if you want to mess up the franchise. In which case (at the risk of sounding like Rodney) fabulous job, you're right on track.
Comment