It seems only fair that I share my test results after that moment of utter panic and doom-and-gloom...
Turns out I did do better than expected, except numerical which was bad but that was expected.
The person I'm in contact with wants to schedule an online meeting today or tomorrow. Today is better cause I'm at the office tomorrow and I really don't want any of my colleagues to find out what I'm up to at the moment.
Turns out I did do better than expected, except numerical which was bad but that was expected.
Spoiler:
Cognitive abilities are at 61% which is identified as moderate:
Aptitude is defined as potential of the candidate and the ability to grasp new concepts which are crucial to his/ her role as an employee in the organization. It is the innate, learned or acquired ability of an individual to perform certain tasks. It helps assess Individual's capacity for learning in general regardless of any
specific skill.
Reasoning = 75% = high
The candidate is likely to have the ability to use steady, logical and consistent reasoning to arrive at a conclusion. He/she may be good at logically structuring problems, situations and facts in order to conceive a solution. He/she may have a strong thinking and understanding process.
Abstract reasoning = 71% = high
The candidate is likely to have the ability to quickly identify patterns and the logical rule underlying those patterns to arrive at solutions. He/she may be able to gather work related information quickly, from various sources and apply it in innovative ways to solve problems. He/she may have good lateral thinking abilities and fluid intelligence. He/ she may be creative in thinking and in integrating data logically to arrive at solutions.
Attention to detail = 71% = high (thank you autism)
The candidate is likely to notice everything that might be of importance, at any point of time. He/she is likely to be able to capture every minute detail and present the work in a clear, complete, precise and easy to understand language. The candidate may be attentive, focused and good at giving excellent results, maintaining excellent quality.
Numerical ability = 21% = low (no kidding and also low level concentration... errm... yeah about that... )
The candidate is less likely to perceive and process numbers and related symbols to perform basic arithmetic operations and perform estimates. He/she may have low level of speed in making analysis or assessments based on given information and a low level of concentration in solving problems.
Data analyses = 57% = moderate
The candidate is moderately likely to structure and analyse observations that are obtained by different data sources. He/she may be moderate in inspection, selection, transformation and remodelling of data in order to derive a conclusion for any particular situation. He/she may have the ability to break down a big problem into smaller parts for better understanding of the problem, in order to solve the problem efficiently.
Verbal ability = 68% = high
The candidate is likely to have a good vocabulary. He/she may be good at proper usage of grammar and punctuation. He/she may be good at understanding word meanings, word relationships and also in interpreting detailed information.
Aptitude is defined as potential of the candidate and the ability to grasp new concepts which are crucial to his/ her role as an employee in the organization. It is the innate, learned or acquired ability of an individual to perform certain tasks. It helps assess Individual's capacity for learning in general regardless of any
specific skill.
Reasoning = 75% = high
The candidate is likely to have the ability to use steady, logical and consistent reasoning to arrive at a conclusion. He/she may be good at logically structuring problems, situations and facts in order to conceive a solution. He/she may have a strong thinking and understanding process.
Abstract reasoning = 71% = high
The candidate is likely to have the ability to quickly identify patterns and the logical rule underlying those patterns to arrive at solutions. He/she may be able to gather work related information quickly, from various sources and apply it in innovative ways to solve problems. He/she may have good lateral thinking abilities and fluid intelligence. He/ she may be creative in thinking and in integrating data logically to arrive at solutions.
Attention to detail = 71% = high (thank you autism)
The candidate is likely to notice everything that might be of importance, at any point of time. He/she is likely to be able to capture every minute detail and present the work in a clear, complete, precise and easy to understand language. The candidate may be attentive, focused and good at giving excellent results, maintaining excellent quality.
Numerical ability = 21% = low (no kidding and also low level concentration... errm... yeah about that... )
The candidate is less likely to perceive and process numbers and related symbols to perform basic arithmetic operations and perform estimates. He/she may have low level of speed in making analysis or assessments based on given information and a low level of concentration in solving problems.
Data analyses = 57% = moderate
The candidate is moderately likely to structure and analyse observations that are obtained by different data sources. He/she may be moderate in inspection, selection, transformation and remodelling of data in order to derive a conclusion for any particular situation. He/she may have the ability to break down a big problem into smaller parts for better understanding of the problem, in order to solve the problem efficiently.
Verbal ability = 68% = high
The candidate is likely to have a good vocabulary. He/she may be good at proper usage of grammar and punctuation. He/she may be good at understanding word meanings, word relationships and also in interpreting detailed information.
The person I'm in contact with wants to schedule an online meeting today or tomorrow. Today is better cause I'm at the office tomorrow and I really don't want any of my colleagues to find out what I'm up to at the moment.
Comment