Originally posted by the dancer of spaz
View Post
I just figured...
controversial? I dunno...
controversial? I dunno...
Spoiler:
That she couldn't bring herself to have an abortion, but wasn't ready to carry John's child after all that he had done... especially if she determined that it was hereditary, and especially if he threatened to do anything and everything to keep his "family" together.
As for keeping it for so long, she did say she waited until she thought he was gone for good. And if she was living out the rest of her life in various parts of the world, treating each patient in a desperate attempt to make up for John somehow (perhaps out of guilt for not being able to save him), having a child might not have been viable or logical.
I also don't think she could've known how long it would be before she could carry the a frozen embryo to term... It could've just been coincidence on her part.
As for keeping it for so long, she did say she waited until she thought he was gone for good. And if she was living out the rest of her life in various parts of the world, treating each patient in a desperate attempt to make up for John somehow (perhaps out of guilt for not being able to save him), having a child might not have been viable or logical.
I also don't think she could've known how long it would be before she could carry the a frozen embryo to term... It could've just been coincidence on her part.
Spoiler:
Well, if it was heriditary why did she still have Ashley?
Knowing the chances the child would end to be just like her father. Wasn't her guilt about not saving John enough, she would have dared to fail again? To still go on with it because she was lonely?
I do think Helen is wiser than that but we don't know what being 157 can do to a person.
But knowing he could warp time, I would never think myself safe in that situation.
There's just something that bothering me about the whole thing...
Knowing the chances the child would end to be just like her father. Wasn't her guilt about not saving John enough, she would have dared to fail again? To still go on with it because she was lonely?
I do think Helen is wiser than that but we don't know what being 157 can do to a person.
But knowing he could warp time, I would never think myself safe in that situation.
There's just something that bothering me about the whole thing...
Originally posted by the dancer of spaz
View Post
Or here's another question!
Spoiler:
Did John really have so much disdain for Helen back then, regarding her wayward behavior and profession, or do you think the dementia has warped his memories and incited so much hate?
Part of me wondered if he didn't have a little bit of a problem with Helen after the things he said.
Part of me wondered if he didn't have a little bit of a problem with Helen after the things he said.
Spoiler:
I think it's a case of dementia because he seemed very much in love with Helen.
He blames Helen for not having saved him and for keeping his daughter (his flesh and blood) from him.
He blames Helen for not having saved him and for keeping his daughter (his flesh and blood) from him.
Question:
Spoiler:
I don't know if this was already discused but where could John's scar come from?
Comment