Originally posted by Willow'sCat
View Post
Now, I do agree that we cannot call the Doctor a mass murderer. We cannot call military personnel murderers, as the term "murder" is actually a legal issue, you can be a killer without being a murder, hence the term "man slaughter". In warfare we see different rules and laws. It is legal and legitimate for one uniformed individual to kill another uniformed individual of the opposing side, yet there are still boundaries, these are known as war crimes. It is legitimate to kill the enemy's forces in warfare, but not the civilians. The Doctor never kills innocents, the Doctor can NOT. But he CAN kill enemy combatants, usually after he's given them the chance to become civilians again.
The Doctor is a killer, no doubt about it. But he is in essence a one man army, fighting on behalf of nations and planets. We must view him as a soldier, a General, just as his "daughter" asserted, and thus I would suggest he is subject to the same laws of war as any soldier is. The military exists because it is a necessity, a sad but very real necessity. For as long as there are people in the world motivated by greed and violence, we will always need a body of men willing to sacrifice themselves and fight for the freedom and protection of others - the Doctor is such a man.
Comment