Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Political Discussion Thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    But Emails!!
    http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2017/...al-emails-too/
    sigpic
    ALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.
    A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yet
    The truth isn't the truth

    Comment


      Originally posted by aretood2 View Post
      I don't think that word means what you think it means...

      Err, that's not what FH was saying.
      Ma'at is a concept like Karma, but unlike Karma, Ma'at has been (wrongly) deified.
      Hey everyone! The bible isn't about living a life respecting justice, order, and harmony...neither are the Buddha's teachings. Who knew?
      They both are, just THIER justice, THIER order, THIER harmony.
      Buddhists are just less likely to ignore the non violence aspect. (if indeed the bible has such a thing, some Christians like to point out that it doesn't)
      The whole "Weighing the soul after death" thing doesn't really sound like pure philosophical or scientific conceptualization.
      It's philosophical for sure, the feather of truth (which is what it is called, not the feather of Ma'at) is a self judgemental system, and if the goal of science is objective truth, it fits that criterion as well.
      sigpic
      ALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.
      A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yet
      The truth isn't the truth

      Comment


        Originally posted by Gatefan1976 View Post
        And did his son in law have classified data in those emails?

        Comment


          Originally posted by pscard View Post
          It's kinda silly that two world leaders have reduced their rhetoric to name-calling. I wish they would have a REAL dialog of peace.
          Not in either's interest.

          Kim is doing a carefully calculated maneuver here. His regime derives power from the US as the ultimate evil, and the development of nukes as the only deterrent against imminent invasion. They've been doing this bark for decades.

          Trump doesn't seem to do calculated maneuvers, but it does work in his benefit: it's an easy way to look strong. Hell, it's why this has been a thing at all: Kim seems strong in his country, and other world leaders can easily look strong by reacting to it. The attention dies down, some deal is reached that benefits everyone and the next cycle starts.

          The issue with these threats however, is that it can easily lead to unwanted escalation. Moreso on the US than the NK side. NK doesn't want to attack, merely the theoretical capability to do so. After all, there's a snowball's chance in hell that NK will win, but it sure as hell can inflict massive damage. If not to the US mainland, then to it's pacific assets, allies and the entire region.

          After all, Trump doesn't literally possess a nuclear button with which to launch a missile: Some guy in a missile silo does. The same for NK. If America were to pick up some signal that NK launched a missile straight at, say, Guam, by the time that info gets through decisions will be made on a minute-to-minute basis. Which leaves VERY little time to check: whether calculations are correct, whether measurements are correct. It will leave no time for diplomats to question intentions, no time for anyone to really know anything new. Is it a nuke? is it not? A rogue missile? A defect? is it scheduled to explode mid-flight as a statement? A genuine attack?

          After that, NK can nuke SK, Japan or china with really nothing the US can do. Shooting down missiles is hard, and there's no guarantee that the US can maintain a perfect missile perimeter. First strike by the US is preferred, but then China may get involved.

          And nobody wants to open up the pandora's box that is NK, with it's poor, underfed, indoctrinated and violently suppressed people. Nobody wants a korean ISIS with nukes.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Annoyed View Post
            T...there will be a lot of civilian casualties in NK....
            Not just NK.

            Originally posted by aretood2 View Post
            I don't think that word means what you think it means...Hey everyone! The bible isn't about living a life respecting justice, order, and harmony...neither are the Buddha's teachings. Who knew?
            I wasn't aware only religious people can live a life respecting justice, order and harmony.
            Heightmeyer's Lemming -- still the coolest Lemming of the forum

            Proper Stargate Rewatch -- season 10 of SG-1

            Comment


              Originally posted by Annoyed View Post
              That ain't gonna happen, not with that nut job in NK. He has been belligerent & provocative for how many years?
              Look at it this way. Would you rather have flying insults or flying military hardware? If it avoids a war, let 'em stick their tongues out at each other for all I care. I really don't want to see a war here.
              But it might happen.

              I don't think the US will strike first. If he launches against the US or an ally, there's a fair to middlin chance we can shoot down whatever he launches (if it doesn't fall out of the sky on its own)

              But successful or not, if he strikes first, I'm pretty sure there will be a war. The US doesn't need nukes to put him down, thankfully. And I really don't think that NK has a sufficient arsenal to sustain a nuclear war. So it won't likely be an all out nuclear holocaust. But we will take him out and there will be a lot of civilian casualties in NK.

              The worst part of this is that the NK people aren't the problem, it's just the nuts running the country. It's sad, but even though they will be kept to a minimum, there will be casualties.
              yup...that's the hard thing about war....that no matter how hard you try there will always be civilian casualties (not to mention quite a bit of property damage) which is why war should only be a very last possible resort....and whether Dictator Fathead has pushed us to that brink yet is a debatable question

              Comment


                Originally posted by garhkal View Post
                And did his son in law have classified data in those emails?
                yes.
                sigpic
                ALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.
                A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yet
                The truth isn't the truth

                Comment


                  Originally posted by mad_gater View Post
                  yup...that's the hard thing about war....that no matter how hard you try there will always be civilian casualties (not to mention quite a bit of property damage) which is why war should only be a very last possible resort....and whether Dictator Fathead has pushed us to that brink yet is a debatable question
                  Which fathead?
                  sigpic
                  ALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.
                  A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yet
                  The truth isn't the truth

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by thekillman View Post

                    After all, Trump doesn't literally possess a nuclear button with which to launch a missile: Some guy in a missile silo does. The same for NK. If America were to pick up some signal that NK launched a missile straight at, say, Guam, by the time that info gets through decisions will be made on a minute-to-minute basis. Which leaves VERY little time to check: whether calculations are correct, whether measurements are correct. It will leave no time for diplomats to question intentions, no time for anyone to really know anything new. Is it a nuke? is it not? A rogue missile? A defect? is it scheduled to explode mid-flight as a statement? A genuine attack?
                    Close enough: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_football
                    Total syffy posts: 36,690
                    (Chosen One)


                    Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.
                    Matthew 5:9

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Gatefan1976 View Post
                      yes.
                      Which made my sister snort so loud I had to ask her what funny thing she was reading.

                      Also, NK says the US declared war... which is funny since you can't technically declare war on a country you're still technically at war with.
                      Heightmeyer's Lemming -- still the coolest Lemming of the forum

                      Proper Stargate Rewatch -- season 10 of SG-1

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Gatefan1976 View Post
                        Err, that's not what FH was saying.
                        Ma'at is a concept like Karma, but unlike Karma, Ma'at has been (wrongly) deified.
                        But Karma is a Hindu concept of life and rebirth....how is that not religious?

                        They both are, just THIER justice, THIER order, THIER harmony.
                        Buddhists are just less likely to ignore the non violence aspect. (if indeed the bible has such a thing, some Christians like to point out that it doesn't)
                        Buddhists haven't had much of a chance to do so. Then again, the few Buddhist nations that there are aren't exactly the bastions of religious freedom and civil liberties.

                        It's philosophical for sure, the feather of truth (which is what it is called, not the feather of Ma'at) is a self judgemental system, and if the goal of science is objective truth, it fits that criterion as well.
                        But that doesn't negate that it is introduced within Egyptian religion. Religions tend to come stock full with philosophical concepts, Ma'at happens to be one of those concepts. It was developed within a religious context just as I hypothesize Mesopotamian legal codes were developed.

                        Originally posted by Falcon Horus View Post
                        I wasn't aware only religious people can live a life respecting justice, order and harmony.
                        Nobody said that.
                        By Nolamom
                        sigpic


                        Comment


                          Originally posted by aretood2 View Post
                          But that doesn't negate that it is introduced within Egyptian religion. Religions tend to come stock full with philosophical concepts, Ma'at happens to be one of those concepts. It was developed within a religious context just as I hypothesize Mesopotamian legal codes were developed.
                          Religion assimilates to better serve its purpose to the masses.

                          Perfect example: Christmas
                          Heightmeyer's Lemming -- still the coolest Lemming of the forum

                          Proper Stargate Rewatch -- season 10 of SG-1

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Falcon Horus View Post
                            Religion assimilates to better serve its purpose to the masses.

                            Perfect example: Christmas
                            *returns FH's present*
                            Originally posted by aretood2
                            Jelgate is right

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by jelgate View Post
                              *returns FH's present*
                              To which coal plant Krampus?
                              sigpic
                              ALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.
                              A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yet
                              The truth isn't the truth

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Falcon Horus View Post
                                Which made my sister snort so loud I had to ask her what funny thing she was reading.

                                Also, NK says the US declared war... which is funny since you can't technically declare war on a country you're still technically at war with.
                                There was never a declaration of war the first time around, so technically we were never at war with North Korea.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X