The more I watch the show the more I pay attention to the details. Often Jack is positioned behind Sam, and now that I know her expressions by heart I look elsewhere. I can't believe how often O'Neill is nearby - and his eyes are always glazing over. It's too funny.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
When Physics Goes Too Far
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
The tech talk never really bothers me. Plus whenever I understand what shes saying, I feel smart.
And you're very right about closed captioning. I hate having to watch TV without it because I feel like I miss half of whats being said.
It always bothers me when the misspell Kree though. ;>)** Dax
Slowly but surely
regaining my post count.
Dax(ie)Parrot the Very Bored Wierdie Nitty Bluie Alien Purple THUNK Fan
Comment
-
Can't stand technobabble.
I'm jaded by the trekkie in me and I found particularly the later treks were particularly patronising. So often they would solve an difficult problem by just clogging up your brain so fast with technical language in the hope that you wouldn't be able to spot any plot holes or contradictions.
Was irked by Carter's solution in Grace and I didn't understand at all the plot lines in Avenger because of it.Honk if you love cheese
Comment
-
Originally posted by DavidHas anyone felt like Sam has rambled on too long [in a particular sitting], or the science was too much to understand?
I felt she got pretty close in A Matter of Time.THERE ARE THINGS KNOWN...
AND THINGS UNKNOWN...
AND IN BETWEEN...LIES THE STARGATE
Comment
-
Originally posted by Madeleine_WThe ones I dislike are the "lets re-route the primary power through an inertial dampener and disengage the dialing protocols!" type things. It makes me feel like I've wandered into a Voyager ep by mistake
I love the Technobabble. Speaking it is an art unto itself like Elisabethan english.
I read that Amanda Tapping studies for it, quote "Otherwise I'd be like Bambi in the headlights."
In agreement with you, I like it to make sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Madeleine_WOh, right. In England they both get called subtitles. I tried it once on a Channel 4 showing of Stargate. They got all the spelling of the Stargate-Universe-Specific words wrong, including a lot of the technobabble. There, I'm vaguely on-topic.
Comment
-
The technobabble doesn't really bother me much, as I am quite interested in science. I get to tease my mom when I have to explain it all to her, in plain english (or as plain as possible). And it did, after all, help me pass my grade 9 science exam!Always remember to smile. People will wonder what you're up to.
Comment
-
I feel like such a nerd---I understand it![email protected]
http://underworld-x.com
I pledge allegiance to the underworld
One nation under dog
There of which I stand alone
A face in the crowd
Unsung, against the mold
Without a doubt
Singled out
The only way I know
Comment
-
Originally posted by DavidHas anyone felt like Sam has rambled on too long [in a particular sitting], or the science was too much to understand?
I felt she got pretty close in A Matter of Time.Lord §okar, Niles, Mark VI, etc: Dom Howard fan
Tama, Bosphorus, Istanbul Mehmet, Sabian, Zildjian and Remo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lord §okarI feel that Carter should not talk physics at all, she's very poor at it What find kind of scary is that people learn science from shows like Trek and SG-1, and most of what's being said is BS.
Of course it was all concepts and no math.
Think about it, "In space, no one can hear you scream." A quote from a horror/science fiction movie, or a physics lesson? Both!
Comment
-
Originally posted by HatusuOh, stop. People know the difference between real and speculative science. The shows are a great way for people to get a feel for physics. I learned most of my physics from "Star Trek" and other hard science fiction, and beat out a physics major on a teaching exam.
Of course it was all concepts and no math.
Think about it, "In space, no one can hear you scream." A quote from a horror/science fiction movie, or a physics lesson? Both!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Teal'cAnd yet the only show I've found that obeys that law is Firefly
"Firefly"? Hmmm. I don't know. How were they hovering close to the ground? Did they explain how they handled gravity? But you're right about the vacuum. "Star Wars" started a bad trend there. The original "Star Trek" obeyed that law of physics, except for the swish in the opening credits, but they felt guilty about it.
Comment
-
Oh, stop. People know the difference between real and speculative science.
Don't presume that just because you can recognise the amount of bad science propagated by sci-fi, SG-1 and Trek in particular, that "people" can. The official trek site's surveys indicate that many children learn more about science than from any other source.Lord §okar, Niles, Mark VI, etc: Dom Howard fan
Tama, Bosphorus, Istanbul Mehmet, Sabian, Zildjian and Remo
Comment
Comment