Sam's "inner life" is all about her sex life. Gods forbid she should have any actual hobbies or outside interests or, hell, people who are just friends or former classmates/coworkers. It's all about her angsting over the search for love. Or at least a good ****.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
General Ship ( Relationship) Discussion
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ShadowMaatSam's "inner life" is all about her sex life. Gods forbid she should have any actual hobbies or outside interests or, hell, people who are just friends or former classmates/coworkers. It's all about her angsting over the search for love. Or at least a good ****.
As I've said, I'm a shipper, but all the writers had to do, for me, was have Sam and Jack say something/hold hands/anything 'shippy' in Threads...something to give the 'closure' that the shippers want, and we all could get on with our lives and the ship aspect could have been laid to rest.Just my OHO.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Traveler Enroute1I see Sam slightly differently. She's a female in a male dominated, and make that a jealously male dominated, culture. She's succeeded with honors and is where she wants to be. But Sam's a person with a dark side that, like others, is not always visible. True, I'm inferring this because the writers gave her military career as a fait accompli; the only struggle apparently was besting Jack O'Neill at their first meeting. In Prodigy,Spoiler:she goes to bat for Haley, and the CO asks if the girl reminds Sam of herself. He's referring to the chip on Haley's shoulder, her need to be the best, etc.
Sad that the writers didn't have time to scope Sam's past the way we got Daniel (kicked out of the University for his theories), Teal'c (his father's death, family outcasts, training with Bra'Tac) and Jack (black ops past, death of his son).
Just sayin, everyone (male, female, alien) has insecurities. Who knows when they will out? Sam's inner life has been limited by the writers but I don't think Grace was such a leap; late but not a leap. Boring would seem to me to be the always right, ever and only dutiful Sam. Just MHO.
I've never doubted Sam's humanity, her womanhood, her fallibility. I just don't see why there's this idea that she's lacking in any of these characteristics, and why the only way to show them is through ship. And, I can't imagine the same concerns being given for any of the men in a similar situation. The closest I've seen is "isn't it time Daniel got some loving" (ugh, I think I'm going to be sick). And, this is usually because of wanting to see Sarah Gardener again, or recently wanting something to start up between him and Vala. But, I've never seen anyone say, "Hey, we've explored Daniel the scholar and Daniel's soldierly side. Now, lets see him as a man" I've never seen anyone say, "Well, it's a good thing Ish'ta was created. I love Teal'c the alien, but I want to know Teal'c the man." Or, even, "Man, why won't they just let Jack and Sam get together, because I'm really interested in seeing the man in Jack." Or substitute the word human. But, that keeps coming up for Sam. Without ship, do people honestly see Sam as a robot with no life?I'm a girl! A girly girly girl!
Okay, you got me. I can't accept change. This message may look like it was typed on a computer and posted on the internet, but it is actually cave drawings delivered by smoke signals.
Naquada Enhanced Chastity Belts -SG1 edition. On sale now! Heck, I'll give them away
Daniel Jackson Appreciation and Discussion -because he's more than pretty
http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=89
Daniel Jackson: The Beacon of Hope and The Man Who Opened the Stargate
Comment
-
Originally posted by dipsofjazzI have to agree with this. I am a shipper, but I can't stand what the writers have done to Sam. She is a great soldier/scientist, but all the writers can do is have every man/alien fall for Sam. I was also surprised at 'Grace', as I'd never thought of her 'needing' a man to fulfill her life. I won't even start with the Pete/Jack storylines, as I know that, IMHO, the writers cannot write ship to save themselves!
As I've said, I'm a shipper, but all the writers had to do, for me, was have Sam and Jack say something/hold hands/anything 'shippy' in Threads...something to give the 'closure' that the shippers want, and we all could get on with our lives and the ship aspect could have been laid to rest.Just my OHO.
Just sayin', a ship doesn't always work out. Problem here: it isn't anywhere and it should be one way or the other. MHO. <wow, that was hard to say>MISSION: STARGATE REWATCH 2011-2012ENGAGEDDONE!
sigpic
Beware Helen Magnus - Doctor of A$$-Kicking
Comment
-
Originally posted by dipsofjazzAs I've said, I'm a shipper, but all the writers had to do, for me, was have Sam and Jack say something/hold hands/anything 'shippy' in Threads...something to give the 'closure' that the shippers want, and we all could get on with our lives and the ship aspect could have been laid to rest.Just my OHO.
i hear some shippers say that all they'd need is to see a scene like you mentioned for 'threads', and then they could move on and let the show move on with other stories. i couldn't do that. it's great in theory, but i'd *always* want *more*. and doesn't that apply to any storyline a fan loves? you want more.
i think the only closure the hand holding scene would give me is that i'd know that sam and jack closed one chapter of their relay (will they/won't they) only to open another as a couple.
sallysally
sigpic
Comment
-
I just wonder will it ever be satisfactory. Anything beyond the "not exactly" and people who think like me will be disappointed. But, there may be some anti-shippers who would prefer to see a tossed off line where Sam mentions she's going to see Jack for the weekend, as long as that's it, give the shippers a bone and never mention it again. Some shippers may feel the same way. "We got closure and it went our way." On the other hand, some shippers may feel that one line isn't enough because it wouldn't be realistic for Sam to only mention Jack one time. So, that would mean they'd have to sprinkle hints throughout, which would irritate me, and since I've been irritated this long I think I deserve a break And, would shippers really be satisfied with seeing only one half of the romance you've invested all these years in? I don't think that would satisfy me.
The problems started when tptb decided to start up a ship that couldn't go anywhere unless one of the pair was gone. And, that strikes me as a pretty dismal way to have a ship. I really don't see how this could turn into anything but frustration for a large group of people.
majorsal:
no. why? because i want to *see* them as a couple a LOT of times. years of waiting adds to that desire.I'm a girl! A girly girly girl!
Okay, you got me. I can't accept change. This message may look like it was typed on a computer and posted on the internet, but it is actually cave drawings delivered by smoke signals.
Naquada Enhanced Chastity Belts -SG1 edition. On sale now! Heck, I'll give them away
Daniel Jackson Appreciation and Discussion -because he's more than pretty
http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=89
Daniel Jackson: The Beacon of Hope and The Man Who Opened the Stargate
Comment
-
Originally posted by Traveler Enroute1Again, I see Sam as having had normal, human misgivings about the course of her life. That, at one time, made me think of her as weak, too. I don't anymore. But I agree that as written, the ship the series gave us has never been given full attention. So at this stage, I'm willing to resolve the ship by Sam resolving there's NO ship; Jack won't leave the service (still battling the politicos for full support of SGC) and she's where she needs to be, too. Maybe a scene where she's seen making That Call or finishing it. Sam definitely should do the thing, no inferences or vagueness. Cut it. * *
Just sayin', a ship doesn't always work out. Problem here: it isn't anywhere and it should be one way or the other. MHO. <wow, that was hard to say>sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by majorsali can only speak for myself, but i'm *never* going to get enough of sam/jack. meaning, if they'd showed sam and jack holding hands, etc, in 'threads', it would have given me the impression they were together as a couple. but would that *really* have satisfied me? no. why? because i want to *see* them as a couple a LOT of times. years of waiting adds to that desire.
i hear some shippers say that all they'd need is to see a scene like you mentioned for 'threads', and then they could move on and let the show move on with other stories. i couldn't do that. it's great in theory, but i'd *always* want *more*. and doesn't that apply to any storyline a fan loves? you want more.
i think the only closure the hand holding scene would give me is that i'd know that sam and jack closed one chapter of their relay (will they/won't they) only to open another as a couple.
sallysigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by dipsofjazzI just wish they'd finished it, one way or another. I, of course, would like it if they'd just said that they were together. I know that's not what you want, but whatever they did, at least it would have been finished and we could all get back to watching the show without this hanging around. The writers leave so many stories unfinished, but this one is so big, and causes such a divide in fandom, that a conclusion is all that's needed for us all to sit back and watch the new show without this niggling away in the background.
I know some people don't care one way or the other about this issue...I do because I've been following it for years as have a lot of other people. So since they chose to set it up so there was a potential future for them (i.e., Sam did NOT get married to Pete and Kerry dumped Jack because of his feelings for Sam), then why not give the audience a little follow up on this matter? A line of dialogue here and there? Otherwise, why did they choose to focus on this story if it wasn't leading anywhere? And why not have Sam married off to Pete? That would have effectively ended the "ship debate."
But since they intentionally left the door open...they wrote it, they focused on it, etc. then give us bits here and there for continuity's sake and also for the sake of people like me who have been hoping for some kind of resolution. I not expecting a cheesy gateroom wedding...just a nod here and there especially when RDA does cameos. The truth is no matter what they do or don't do, someone's going to be carping. So why would that group of people be the ones who essentially got that first step in Threads? As for people who don't want anything between them, well I think they're already ticked because the writers left the door open for a future between them.
And as for the women tend to emote more than men comment I made, I'll stand by that...women do tend to emote more than men. There's nothing negative about that statement. That doesn't mean men don't feel anything or don't get emotional of course...just that women tend to be more emotive than men are.
Mary Beth
...You're ALWAYS Welcome in Samanda: Amanda's Community of New Fans and Old Friends...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dani347I'm not saying Sam didn't have any insecurities. I would love it if they explored her as a woman in the military. But, I don't equate exploring her female side with ship. They did explore Daniel as a civilian. They explored Teal'c as an alien. Maybe not a lot with Teal'c, but it was there throughout the episodes. There was Sam's relationship with Jacob before he became a Tok'ra. Secrets is one of my favorite episodes for Daniel and Sam. When I say Sam was the least angsty, I don't mean she's happy go lucky Mary Poppins who's always right. Her problems are much more easy for the average Joe to relate to, imo. She lost a parent. That's something that a lot of people can relate to. Unlike seeing your parents crushed in front of you. She had a strained relationship with her dad. Again, a lot of people can relate. Not too many people can really relate to having their child accidently kill themselves with their gun. She's a woman in a male oriented job. I don't think they explored that nearly enough. And, well, frankly I'm scared of how they would have. AT had to tell them to write her the way they would write the men and let her put in the femininity. Seems their ideas of what a woman is didn't sit right with the actual woman. But, back to my point, women can relate to that, even if they aren't themselves in a male dominated job. But, your average Stargate watcher probably can't relate to being enslaved for thousands of years.
I've never doubted Sam's humanity, her womanhood, her fallibility. I just don't see why there's this idea that she's lacking in any of these characteristics, and why the only way to show them is through ship. And, I can't imagine the same concerns being given for any of the men in a similar situation. The closest I've seen is "isn't it time Daniel got some loving" (ugh, I think I'm going to be sick). And, this is usually because of wanting to see Sarah Gardener again, or recently wanting something to start up between him and Vala. But, I've never seen anyone say, "Hey, we've explored Daniel the scholar and Daniel's soldierly side. Now, lets see him as a man" I've never seen anyone say, "Well, it's a good thing Ish'ta was created. I love Teal'c the alien, but I want to know Teal'c the man." Or, even, "Man, why won't they just let Jack and Sam get together, because I'm really interested in seeing the man in Jack." Or substitute the word human. But, that keeps coming up for Sam. Without ship, do people honestly see Sam as a robot with no life?
Just sayin', I feel the series PTB didn't count on how popular the Sam Carter the soldier/scientist would be. From the beginning it was Sam's brains and bravery that defined her, then when the attraction between Sam and Jack was played up, some focus shifted to that. I certainly never watched the show for the ship! Yeah, I liked it but the show and the Team brought me back each week. In my post before this, I suggest that the way to set this all right side up is to have Sam break the ship, clearly and finally. It'll break my heart but without RDA, well, there just isn't the will there anymore to tie up things. Sam doesn't have to be stop-punched like our girl Elizabeth Weir; she's our go-to gal, so let her go-to this stalemate and break it. MHO hope it makes sense.MISSION: STARGATE REWATCH 2011-2012ENGAGEDDONE!
sigpic
Beware Helen Magnus - Doctor of A$$-Kicking
Comment
-
But, seriously, would you (general shipper you) be satisfied with ship with one of the pair gone? Lets say RDA doesn't want to make little guest appearances or even record his voice so there can be a two way conversation over the phone. And, no speculation as to his motives or character, just supposing you only get to see it from Sam's side. Would episode after episode of Sam saying, "hmm, uh-huh, well, Love you, Jack" and hanging up the phone, or Daniel asking Sam what she and Jack are doing on their vacation time, or Teal'c telling Sam to say hello to Jack for him, or Mitchell commenting, or anything like that be enough, if you never got to see them together?
Various people:
I'm only saying that I don't see her only in terms of Jack but what else did they give her (for the longest time) except a ship? Never a robot, yet isn't perfection a rather humanless state?
As for people who don't want anything between them, well I think they're already ticked because the writers left the door open for a future between them.
And as for the women tend to emote more than men comment I made, I'll stand by that...women do tend to emote more than men. There's nothing negative about that statement. That doesn't mean men don't feel anything or don't get emotional of course...just that women tend to be more emotive than men are.Last edited by Dani347; 26 November 2005, 08:03 PM.I'm a girl! A girly girly girl!
Okay, you got me. I can't accept change. This message may look like it was typed on a computer and posted on the internet, but it is actually cave drawings delivered by smoke signals.
Naquada Enhanced Chastity Belts -SG1 edition. On sale now! Heck, I'll give them away
Daniel Jackson Appreciation and Discussion -because he's more than pretty
http://forum.gateworld.net/showthread.php?t=89
Daniel Jackson: The Beacon of Hope and The Man Who Opened the Stargate
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dani347I just wonder will it ever be satisfactory. Anything beyond the "not exactly" and people who think like me will be disappointed. But, there may be some anti-shippers who would prefer to see a tossed off line where Sam mentions she's going to see Jack for the weekend, as long as that's it, give the shippers a bone and never mention it again. Some shippers may feel the same way. "We got closure and it went our way." On the other hand, some shippers may feel that one line isn't enough because it wouldn't be realistic for Sam to only mention Jack one time. So, that would mean they'd have to sprinkle hints throughout, which would irritate me, and since I've been irritated this long I think I deserve a break And, would shippers really be satisfied with seeing only one half of the romance you've invested all these years in? I don't think that would satisfy me.
The problems started when tptb decided to start up a ship that couldn't go anywhere unless one of the pair was gone. And, that strikes me as a pretty dismal way to have a ship. I really don't see how this could turn into anything but frustration for a large group of people.
majorsal:
As you see.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by dipsofjazzI just wish they'd finished it, one way or another. I, of course, would like it if they'd just said that they were together. I know that's not what you want, but whatever they did, at least it would have been finished and we could all get back to watching the show without this hanging around. The writers leave so many stories unfinished, but this one is so big, and causes such a divide in fandom, that a conclusion is all that's needed for us all to sit back and watch the new show without this niggling away in the background.
Just sayin', if I had my druthers...MISSION: STARGATE REWATCH 2011-2012ENGAGEDDONE!
sigpic
Beware Helen Magnus - Doctor of A$$-Kicking
Comment
-
Originally posted by Traveler Enroute1I see Sam slightly differently. She's a female in a male dominated, and make that a jealously male dominated, culture. She's succeeded with honors and is where she wants to be. But Sam's a person with a dark side that, like others, is not always visible. True, I'm inferring this because the writers gave her military career as a fait accompli; the only struggle apparently was besting Jack O'Neill at their first meeting. In Prodigy,Spoiler:she goes to bat for Haley, and the CO asks if the girl reminds Sam of herself. He's referring to the chip on Haley's shoulder, her need to be the best, etc.
Just sayin, everyone (male, female, alien) has insecurities. Who knows when they will out? Sam's inner life has been limited by the writers but I don't think Grace was such a leap; late but not a leap. Boring would seem to me to be the always right, ever and only dutiful Sam. Just MHO.
Then, of course, the pendulum swings to the other extreme... she becomes technobabble Sam... I know us girls have our mood swings but this is nonsensical. A competent female who is obviously able to multitask has no emotional life portrayed unless it has to do with men... That, is boring...sigpic
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dani347But, seriously, would you (general shipper you) be satisfied with ship with one of the pair gone? Lets say RDA doesn't want to make little guest appearances or even record his voice so there can be a two way conversation over the phone. And, no speculation as to his motives or character, just supposing you only get to see it from Sam's side. Would episode after episode of Sam saying, "hmm, uh-huh, well, Love you, Jack" and hanging up the phone, or Daniel asking Sam what she and Jack are doing on their vacation time, or Teal'c telling Sam to say hello to Jack for him, or Mitchell commenting, or anything like that be enough, if you never got to see them together?sigpic
Comment
Comment