They didn't seem very much like phasers to me. Phasers to me seem like a sustained beam of energy. These things are basically just longer versions of the energy bolts that normal Asgard ships fire. Same with the Ori main weapon. Didn't seem like phasers to me.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Future Ships #Spoilers#
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
The problem is that we've had every weapon but energy weapons and sooo many people wanted them.
I be the only reason why energy weapons were used was because so many fans wanted themsigpic
Spoiler:President of the 'AFTU Writers Association'
President of the 'Count to 15,000 Legends' club
Forum Charmer
Forum Ambassador
Prince of The Hugglings
CURA STORY LINE, ATFU Pg 53 - Pg 804 (751pages)
VAMPIRE STORYLINE PT1, AFTU Pg 804 - 912
VAMPIRE STORYLINE PT 2, AFTU - Pg 855
Comment
-
Originally posted by ACharmedAsgard View PostThe problem is that we've had every weapon but energy weapons and sooo many people wanted them.
I be the only reason why energy weapons were used was because so many fans wanted themsome relationships are worth getting your heart broken over
doctor who
Comment
-
In reality we don't need new ships classes (although it is cool to get them) we need to upgrade our current ships to properly fulfill their roll -- Lets take the 304 with its bays full of f-302's for example. The thing is suppost to be the equivalent of an aircraft-carrier yet it cannot fulfill that role to any affect. It is actually more like a missle-cruiser with fighter support, and not a very strong one at that.
The time honored military roll of carrier is to launch a deadly force of fighter/bombers against an enemy fleet without revealing its location. It harresses the enemy and destroys their fleet without putting itself in the direct line of fire; also something can be said about the element of surprise which is just kind of wrecked when a big highly visible ship takes 5 minutes burling towards the enemy before its within weapons range -- Anyone ever watch "Tora! Tora! Tora!" ? If you have you know what I'm talking about. The F-302 lacks the neccessary range and firepower for this. We were on the right path with the X-302 which was designed to be hyperspace capable for short distances. With the 303 we figured out how to make a Naquadria hyper-drive work correctly for short distances (Buffer Module). Equip the F-302 with a Naquadria hyper-drive with buffer module technology. As far as fire-power the F-302 already has missle hard points and we already have missles equipped with small nuclear warheads which can be carried by any fighter/bomber -- not just the F-302 the F-18 as well. Every carrier in the current U.S. fleet (Real World -- Not Gate World) is equipped with such weapons and at a moments notice can equip is squadrons with said weapons.
Equipped with such upgraded F-302A's the 304 class would be able to properly fulfill their roll as a carrier and launch their squadrons against enemy fleets from a distance producing maximum damage on the enemy with minimal risk to the 304 mother ship; and gaining the element of surprise. Next on the plate can't we get a carrier to carry more then a dozen fighter/bombers, for goodness sake !?!?!?
How about a 305 super carrier which carries six dozen F-302A's? We can build conventional aircraft carriers capable of carrying that kind of fire-power we have the technical know-how and experience with building one 303 and four 304's so far lets just expand our horizons a little.
Oh and another thing during the Cold War the cornerstone of the U.S. fleet was the aircraft-carrier and the cornerstone of the Russian fleet was the ballistic missle submarine. Apparently the U.S. is following the same path as before and building carriers. Why don't the Russians do what they know best and start building earth some big bad ships that fulfill and equivalent purpose as a ballistic submarine -- designed to run silent and undetected, equipped with a dozen or more big, bad missles with multiple warheads on each missle. And I'm not talking convention missles here I'm talking long range intragalactic missles with hyperspace drive engines (yah, let your mind roll that one over for a while).Last edited by turbo1889; 02 May 2007, 07:24 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by turbo1889 View Post
Oh and another thing during the Cold War the cornerstone of the U.S. fleet was the aircraft-carrier and the cornerstone of the Russian fleet was the ballistic missle submarine. Apparently the U.S. is following the same path as before and building carriers. Why don't the Russians do what they know best and start building earth some big bad ships that fulfill and equivalent purpose as a ballistic submarine -- designed to run silent and undetected, equipped with a dozen or more big, bad missles with multiple warheads on each missle. And I'm not talking convention missles here I'm talking long range intragalactic missles with hyperspace drive engines (yah, let your mind roll that one over for a while).some relationships are worth getting your heart broken over
doctor who
Comment
-
Originally posted by turbo1889 View PostIn reality we don't need new ships classes (although it is cool to get them) we need to upgrade our current ships to properly fulfill their roll -- Lets take the 304 with its bays full of f-302's for example. The thing is suppost to be the equivalent of an aircraft-carrier yet it cannot fulfill that role to any affect. It is actually more like a missle-cruiser with fighter support, and not a very strong one at that.
The time honored military roll of carrier is to launch a deadly force of fighter/bombers against an enemy fleet without revealing its location. It harresses the enemy and destroys their fleet without putting itself in the direct line of fire; also something can be said about the element of surprise which is just kind of wrecked when a big highly visible ship takes 5 minutes burling towards the enemy before its within weapons range -- Anyone ever watch "Tora! Tora! Tora!" ? If you have you know what I'm talking about. The F-302 lacks the neccessary range and firepower for this. We were on the right path with the X-302 which was designed to be hyperspace capable for short distances. With the 303 we figured out how to make a Naquadria hyper-drive work correctly for short distances (Buffer Module). Equip the F-302 with a Naquadria hyper-drive with buffer module technology. As far as fire-power the F-302 already has missle hard points and we already have missles equipped with small nuclear warheads which can be carried by any fighter/bomber -- not just the F-302 the F-18 as well. Every carrier in the current U.S. fleet (Real World -- Not Gate World) is equipped with such weapons and at a moments notice can equip is squadrons with said weapons.
Equipped with such upgraded F-302A's the 304 class would be able to properly fulfill their roll as a carrier and launch their squadrons against enemy fleets from a distance producing maximum damage on the enemy with minimal risk to the 304 mother ship; and gaining the element of surprise. Next on the plate can't we get a carrier to carry more then a dozen fighter/bombers, for goodness sake !?!?!?
How about a 305 super carrier which carries six dozen F-302A's? We can build conventional aircraft carriers capable of carrying that kind of fire-power we have the technical know-how and experience with building one 303 and four 304's so far lets just expand our horizons a little.
Oh and another thing during the Cold War the cornerstone of the U.S. fleet was the aircraft-carrier and the cornerstone of the Russian fleet was the ballistic missle submarine. Apparently the U.S. is following the same path as before and building carriers. Why don't the Russians do what they know best and start building earth some big bad ships that fulfill and equivalent purpose as a ballistic submarine -- designed to run silent and undetected, equipped with a dozen or more big, bad missles with multiple warheads on each missle. And I'm not talking convention missles here I'm talking long range intragalactic missles with hyperspace drive engines (yah, let your mind roll that one over for a while).
I.E. Matter synthesizing a huge bulkhead and beaming it directly into postion. Give it a year and we'd have a sizable fleet with the most advanced weapons and defense in the galaxy.
Comment
-
Actually we might be seeing ships with more Asagrd features since we have an easy to understand database of their technology which is sure to include ship building techniques and schematics. The next class of a ship might even include the most advanced Asgard power generator and look more like one of their ships mixed with our designs. I think that would be a pretty cool looking ship.
A very wise man once said...."Reality is an illusion created by a lack of Alcohol."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ravroz View PostActually we might be seeing ships with more Asagrd features since we have an easy to understand database of their technology which is sure to include ship building techniques and schematics. The next class of a ship might even include the most advanced Asgard power generator and look more like one of their ships mixed with our designs. I think that would be a pretty cool looking ship.some relationships are worth getting your heart broken over
doctor who
Comment
-
Originally posted by thegatebuilders View Postafter the korlev, i was expecting a similar move, but the russian seems to have disappared after that mishap at camelot
As to me, i would like to see some 'crusier' variants. if the 304 is supposed to be a fighter carrier, hows about an escort ship?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ManiacMike View Posttoo startrek-ish
tis why I said "phasers"
I wanted something...different. Maybe more original.
When I seen the lasers come off of the hull I was like "yay! energy weapons...ohhhh I seen that before."
I them 'Pulse Beams'!
The problem is that we've had every weapon but energy weapons and sooo many people wanted them.
I be the only reason why energy weapons were used was because so many fans wanted them
I think Thor summed it up best:
THOR
The Asgard would never invent a weapon that propels small weights of iron and carbon alloys by igniting a powder of potassium nitrate, charcoal, and sulpher.
Would be silly to have seen them spending their last year of existence working on a way to shoot limited projectile weapons when they've always used energy based ones themselves all this time.
Rail Guns aren't effective against shielded targets, nor is warheads. The only other thing they could have done would be to create a system that would allow the warheads to phase through enemy shields. Although if they gave them that, then there really wouldn be no way to stop them. All they'd need to do was jump into Asuras, launch all the most powerful warheads into the cities, watch them go through the shields & impact inside the structures. At least with the energy weapons they have multiple angles of which to spin it. Such as they were specifically targeted for the Ori shields, so don't cause much damage to Asuran shields, another is that they aren't very powerful because the other 304's don't have ZPM's to max up the power etc.
Actually we might be seeing ships with more Asagrd features since we have an easy to understand database of their technology which is sure to include ship building techniques and schematics. The next class of a ship might even include the most advanced Asgard power generator and look more like one of their ships mixed with our designs. I think that would be a pretty cool looking ship.
Comment
-
New ships for earth... Well we know they can produce ships fast. Between the Prometheus and The Daedalus was about 2 years but now they are building ships much faster. 3 ships in 2 years so we know that it can be done. But how long do you think it will take our scientists to figure out how to reverse engineer everything the asgards added? I doubt they will be able to do that in like 6 months time... For now i am holding on to normal class ships, maybe 1 ship with superior shields or weapons but that's it.
Comment
-
They need a smaller ship, but not weaker. They should take the approach Star Trek did with the Defiant. Small, yet fully capable of taking on a normal sized ship and fully loaded with intergalactic hyperdrives, Asgard power source, Asgard beam weapons, Beam technology, cloak ect. Also, less dependent on a crew so 1 or 2 people could operate it.Last edited by Professor Chaos; 13 May 2007, 01:15 AM.Kevan Smith: "I shoot it, I go home, I get drunk."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Professor Chaos View PostThey need a smaller ship, but not weaker. They should take the approach Star Trek did with the Defiant. Small, yet fully capable of taking on a normal sized ship and fully loaded with intergalactic hyperdrives, Asgard power source, Asgard beam weapons, Beam technology, cloak ect. Also, less dependent on a crew so 1 or 2 people could operate it.
You want smaller ships; steal a few Al'kesh's from the very few System Lords left. Even these little Ori Fighters will do. They have Shielding, Ori pulse weapons and are extremely maneuverableLast edited by VSHARMA; 13 May 2007, 03:30 AM.
For Wraith, hunger burns like a fire.
Tell me, Sheppard, if you found yourself burning alive, would you settle for just one drop of water ...
....... or would you take more?
sigpic
Comment
-
Size doesn't matter. In fact for us smaller is just as effective as big. Remember we are funding this program top secretly and we have limited manpower.
Like I keep saying, pumping out 303 Hulls and fitting them with Asgard subsystems would give us the most powerful fleet and the best bang for our buck in no time.
Comment
-
We are now the biggest threat to most of our enemiessigpic
Spoiler:President of the 'AFTU Writers Association'
President of the 'Count to 15,000 Legends' club
Forum Charmer
Forum Ambassador
Prince of The Hugglings
CURA STORY LINE, ATFU Pg 53 - Pg 804 (751pages)
VAMPIRE STORYLINE PT1, AFTU Pg 804 - 912
VAMPIRE STORYLINE PT 2, AFTU - Pg 855
Comment
Comment