Ha, made up right, and monkeys don't play poker around a bonfire twenty thousand feet in the air! P) Whatever you say.
Yes, we are aware that Stargate is a television show, but most of the science in the show is real science and that is what we are discussing here in the quote unquote Science and Technology Section.
Actually just believing whatever they tell you is not something I would strongly recommend. Several times Carter has been wrong in explaining how the gate works, using terms like demolecularization and even de-atomized [Shiver] The Stargate actually uses dematerialization, the process of converting matter into energy, and we know this from several episodes such as "Forty-Eight Hours." So as you can see believing whatever they say is not always the best course.
I don't want to start an argument here, but posts like this really take away from the forum, was there any need to come in here, and post a completely off topic post just to shove in our faces the redundant fact of the fictionalization of Stargate. If we wanted to blindly believe in everything the Stargate producers tell us we most likely wouldn't be here, and I certainly wouldn't be posting this response so please. If you wish to post like this, don't. I am asking you on behalf of the forum, to be more tolerant of others and basically live and let live. If everyone could do that, the forum would be a much better place.
Just because the Stargate only has thirty-nine symbols doesn't mean it couldn't work, it doesn't have to work on the principle of a grid system it could work on the principle of a coding system, alonethe symbold mean nothing but together they each represent individual locations, allowing for the symbols to be reused and not represnt the same points from gate adress to gate adress. I know that was a sarcastic comment, but if you want you could start a thread about it, because it's off topic here.
Yes, we are aware that Stargate is a television show, but most of the science in the show is real science and that is what we are discussing here in the quote unquote Science and Technology Section.
Actually just believing whatever they tell you is not something I would strongly recommend. Several times Carter has been wrong in explaining how the gate works, using terms like demolecularization and even de-atomized [Shiver] The Stargate actually uses dematerialization, the process of converting matter into energy, and we know this from several episodes such as "Forty-Eight Hours." So as you can see believing whatever they say is not always the best course.
I don't want to start an argument here, but posts like this really take away from the forum, was there any need to come in here, and post a completely off topic post just to shove in our faces the redundant fact of the fictionalization of Stargate. If we wanted to blindly believe in everything the Stargate producers tell us we most likely wouldn't be here, and I certainly wouldn't be posting this response so please. If you wish to post like this, don't. I am asking you on behalf of the forum, to be more tolerant of others and basically live and let live. If everyone could do that, the forum would be a much better place.
Just because the Stargate only has thirty-nine symbols doesn't mean it couldn't work, it doesn't have to work on the principle of a grid system it could work on the principle of a coding system, alonethe symbold mean nothing but together they each represent individual locations, allowing for the symbols to be reused and not represnt the same points from gate adress to gate adress. I know that was a sarcastic comment, but if you want you could start a thread about it, because it's off topic here.
Comment