Originally posted by brihana25
It's about Vala now. I DO NOT want an intergalactic space-ho to become a regular member of SG-1. If "Firefly" was still on and Vala was a new character on it, I would have no problem with her there. No cryin' in baseball and no ho's (not to mention a liar, a cheat, and a thief) on SG-1; that's the bottom line for me.
I might add that I find it curious (and this is not directed at you because I don't know your feelings), but so many of those fans who feel/felt some of the above adjectives could be applied to Sam because of her feelings for and behavior with Jack, Pete, Martouf, etc. -- who felt she was a disgrace to SG-1, morally challenged, now seem to feel that it's OK to have another female character who has behaved worse than Sam. Is it OK for Vala to behave as she has because she isn't military? Just because Vala is "funnier" than Carter? Because Vala has to do these things to survive (or thought she did because there are almost always choices) while Sam did them because she was a "weak" woman who defined herself through men? (according to some.) Seems to me that if one objected to Sam on "moral" grounds, one couldn't accept Vala.
Irrelevant though because Vala IS going to be in S10 and that does make *me* shudder.
Comment