Originally posted by garhkal
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was it wise to send a rescue party ?
Collapse
X
-
question:
if we asked ourselves on every mission "is this wise" we would've buried the gate in Children of the Gods. hell, we never would've gone past cavemen era
besides, hindsight is that powerful feeling that it was obvious, even though common sense told you it was wise at that time. when people make mistakes, they want to prevent it from happening again and they check for ways to detect it, even when it's not detectable.
loosing people for a rescue mission is sad, but if you leave all behind, you lose more people, and morale.
besides, for every dozen rescue missions going right, one goes horribly wrong. just because you screw up once doesn't mean every mission isn't worth it.
lastly, it was an animal.
PS: young and varro's emotional attachement to TJ would ensure they'd loose half the crew before they'd give up on TJ
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jedi_Master_Bra'tac View PostThis has always been the Stargate does things. Sacrificing as many redshirts as possible for the sake of saving one main character is considered a successful mission.
Comment
-
Originally posted by General Jumper One View Postbecause she has the right to explore, she is not a prisoner and she has rights
Comment
-
I love the fact people are saying one human life is moe valuable than 20, really?
They rightfully mounted a rescue mission but they may have been less than rational letting emotional involvement go a litte to far.sigpic
Poppy Appeal
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben 'Teal'c would WIN!!' Noble View PostI love the fact people are saying one human life is moe valuable than 20, really?
They rightfully mounted a rescue mission but they may have been less than rational letting emotional involvement go a litte to far.Originally posted by aretood2Jelgate is right
Comment
-
Originally posted by jelgate View PostSeems rational to save the only person who has medical trainingsigpic
Poppy Appeal
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben 'Teal'c would WIN!!' Noble View PostI love the fact people are saying one human life is moe valuable than 20, really?
They rightfully mounted a rescue mission but they may have been less than rational letting emotional involvement go a litte to far.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jelgate View PostSeems rational to save the only person who has medical training
Who will the medic heal when there's no one left ? TJ's live is not worth the lives of 20 people! Another person maybe but not 20.
Originally posted by garhkal View PostI know many people who would gladly sacrifice hundreds of others, if it saved someone they knew.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nemises View PostNot really. This is not earth where you have plenty of unproductive people who are expendable. On destiny you have scientists, military and three civilians (wray, chloe and eli). As far as i see none of them are expendable (well except chloe). Its absurd how the writers have an unlimited supply of redshirts on destiny.
Who will the medic heal when there's no one left ? TJ's live is not worth the lives of 20 people! Another person maybe but not 20.
Doesn't make it right.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KEK View PostYes, but they're going for realism in SGU.
THAT is real life.
Never leave a man behind. Even if his chance of survival is next to, or is in fact, zero. Every soldier/sailor/airman has the right to know that even if the worst happens, he will find his way back to his home soil, whatever condition he may be in. THAT is important.Last edited by Flyboy; 16 April 2011, 07:56 AM.
"Five Rounds Rapid"
sigpic
Comment
Comment