The only plot hole (if you can call it that) that didn't sit right with me was them finding a drone the size of a large shoe to fit in the back of the shuttle bay.....when the rest of the drones were fricken massive.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Plot Hole - Drone Activation/Deactivation
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Phenom View PostThe only plot hole (if you can call it that) that didn't sit right with me was them finding a drone the size of a large shoe to fit in the back of the shuttle bay.....when the rest of the drones were fricken massive.
Comment
-
The only plot hole in the episode is that the drones so far as we seen seem incapable of destroying there creators, by design, and they also do seem to have the necessary AI.
Unless there is a central intelligence controlling each of the drones clusters. But then you would of thought such a thing would of sent the second command ship the access codes to control the leftover drones.
So it will be interesting to learn the history of the drones and what happen to there creators. I personally doubt they are extinct.Last edited by knowles2; 12 March 2011, 01:27 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Egle01 View PostI'd call it more convenience than plot hole.
Why the hell is there a smaller drone?
It makes absolutely zero sense in terms of the story for there to be a small drone at all. You can create all the reasons you wish for thier existance, but the simple fact is, there is no "in story" explanation for it. Everytime the writers "broke the rules" for things like how long a wormhole can exist, there should be an "in ep" reason for it, but why are there small drones for any other reason than for "plot conveniance".
Quite simply, "Plot Conveniance" is another (albeit more PC) term for plot hole. If SG1/SGA extended a wormhole's duration for more than 38 minutes without a darn good IN SHOW reason, I'd be calling "plot hole" on that as well, so don't think it is my dislike of SGU fueling this comment.sigpicALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yetThe truth isn't the truth
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gatefan1976 View PostRight, don't take this the wrong way Egle01, cause its not directed at you ok.
It's technology created by an alien race. We don't (have to) know everything about its operations, not every piece of information is spoon-fed. I appreciate and support the idea of having different drones, it's a nice change. Just because we don't know or we weren't told why not all drones are the same, doesn't mean there isn't a reason and that it's a plot hole. It's convenient that we happened to find so quickly suitable drone that fit perfectly at the back of the shuttle. I don't see 'plot hole' and 'plot convenience' being the same thing, at all. Even with fan glasses off.
Comment
-
The only plot hole (if you can call it that) that didn't sit right with me was them finding a drone the size of a large shoe to fit in the back of the shuttle bay.....when the rest of the drones were fricken massive.
Why the hell is there a smaller drone?
It makes absolutely zero sense in terms of the story for there to be a small drone at all. You can create all the reasons you wish for thier existance, but the simple fact is, there is no "in story" explanation for it. Everytime the writers "broke the rules" for things like how long a wormhole can exist, there should be an "in ep" reason for it, but why are there small drones for any other reason than for "plot conveniance".
It's convenient that we happened to find so quickly suitable drone that fit perfectly at the back of the shuttle. I don't see 'plot hole' and 'plot convenience' being the same thing, at all. Even with fan glasses off.
they're not plot HOLES since we know Larrin has an aurora and we know they can detect ships at distances, and we knew Baal could modify gates and we know he followed baal. so it's not a plot hole. but they are rather convenient things.
the sizes of the alien ships and their fightercraft in general are convenient, yes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Egle01 View PostIt's technology created by an alien race. We don't (have to) know everything about its operations, not every piece of information is spoon-fed.
I personally like not being told everything. Just look at the discussion something as simple as the size of the drones or how they operate has sparked. The explanations given are logical and in my opinion not required in the episode.
I love things that result in fans coming up with their own theories. It's probably the main thing I miss most about Lost (Show, not the episode).
Comment
-
Originally posted by SG-1-AU View PostOk, so Destiny shows up in the graveyard and activates the drones without the command ship being present. Yet when the command ship is destroyed, the drones don't work. What gives? These things aren't capable of any simple logic on their own?
Originally posted by SG-1-AU View PostAlso, Eli and Rush figure out how to block the subspace signal in a couple of hours. The Ursini on the other hand died out and never were able to come up with a viable tactic. Really? REALLY???
Comment
-
Originally posted by thekillman View Postmore likely explanation is that the Drones have eradicated all advanced life and went dormant as their mission was completed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Egle01 View PostAlrighty.
It's technology created by an alien race. We don't (have to) know everything about its operations, not every piece of information is spoon-fed. I appreciate and support the idea of having different drones, it's a nice change. Just because we don't know or we weren't told why not all drones are the same, doesn't mean there isn't a reason and that it's a plot hole. It's convenient that we happened to find so quickly suitable drone that fit perfectly at the back of the shuttle. I don't see 'plot hole' and 'plot convenience' being the same thing, at all. Even with fan glasses off.
I suppose it could rest on what you define as a plot hole, and what you define as a plot conveniance. To me, a Plot hole is when something happens or exists for no good reason that can be explained "in story" Taking the drones again, to have small drones does not make sense because IIRC, in the 2 eps involving them, thier size was never brought up. If during a firefight someone turned around to Young and said "Colonel, the defensive batteries can handle the larger ones, but the smaller ones are breaking through", (or something similar) then, this wouldn't be an issue for me at all. That they didn't, makes it more of a plot hole.
Now, plot conveniance, I can totally buy. Again, for me, finding a drone so close, having it just fit inside the shuttle, the blues turning up after they get the drone onboard etc, these are all plot conveiniances I have no issue with.
Am I making sense to you on how I see these things as different?sigpicALL THANKS TO THE WONDERFUL CREATOR OF THIS SIG GO TO R.I.G.A lie is just a truth that hasn't gone through conversion therapy yetThe truth isn't the truth
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gatefan1976 View PostI suppose it could rest on what you define as a plot hole, and what you define as a plot conveniance. To me, a Plot hole is when something happens or exists for no good reason that can be explained "in story" Taking the drones again, to have small drones does not make sense because IIRC, in the 2 eps involving them, thier size was never brought up. If during a firefight someone turned around to Young and said "Colonel, the defensive batteries can handle the larger ones, but the smaller ones are breaking through", (or something similar) then, this wouldn't be an issue for me at all. That they didn't, makes it more of a plot hole.
Now, plot conveniance, I can totally buy. Again, for me, finding a drone so close, having it just fit inside the shuttle, the blues turning up after they get the drone onboard etc, these are all plot conveiniances I have no issue with.
Am I making sense to you on how I see these things as different?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Egle01 View Post
I understand what you see as plot convenience since I agree with it and think the same way. But not about plot holes. As I see it, plot holes are story elements that contradict what's been established before. Unanswered questions not being among them.Originally posted by aretood2Jelgate is right
Comment
Comment