Originally posted by Mibi
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Eli and Scott
Collapse
X
-
-
I don't like Scott, and men of his type (pretty much in every town, every city, every part of the world) are that they can be portrayed as a bad but good person - that all his faults are downplayed (he's only human lol!) but he's really good in his heart because he's a Christian and a leader and good looking... because you know, have any or all of those three attributes means there's no way you can be a bad person! Those sorts get away with so much in life, it propels them to the top of society whilst the genuine, completely non corrupt get left behind as his lackeys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Naonak View PostReally? Who were they?
Seriously, though, I could count the number of BSG characters I liked on one hand (and they weren't all at the same time), whereas with SGU I like all of the main group - and a couple of the supporting players - to some extent.
I also just didn't like certain characters like Starbuck, but even with the ones I did like the romances really started to drag on the patience when you looked around and noticed that literally every main character was somehow involved in one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kaiphantom View PostI'm just gonna say this. When you are scheduled to parachute out of an airplane, do you assume you already know what to do? Or do you listen to the guy with a bunch of experience?
I'm trying to tell you exactly what it's like from a Real Life nerd's perspective. Since we're generally turned down, and used by women a lot, we know the signs. We tend to have the perspective of being able to sit back and observe these women running around. After time, it becomes predictable. We easily point out all the signs to each other.
As Rush said in a previous episode, "If you can't see the signs, you're no good to me."
Even among women I do value as friends because they don't treat me as something to use, I can notice some of the behaviors. But these rare women I *can* talk to about it, and they apologize and change, not even realizing they were doing it because it was subconscious.
You're female. That means you like to see good relationships in most of your shows. You're generally a shipper, and so that colors your viewpoint. I wouldn't doubt that there are already plenty of women who are going SQUEEE over the thought of a Scott/Chloe pairing and busy writing fanfiction where they live happily ever after. Probably where Chloe changes Scott's "bad boy" ways, which is a fantasy most females have.
But I'd bet at least a few of them realize it's all in their head at the moment.
With that, I'll be done. As others have pointed out, you can't see he situation for what it is. I really feel like I'm trying to debate with a hardcore Shipper who won't take any flak for their chosen couple, and I know how pointless that gets.
So, I apologize if I came across a bit hostile, but it's born more out of frustration than anything else. It's hard to argue rationally against irrationality, and that tends to make nerds a bit steamed.
But I still agree with Rosehawk on almost all points here.
I think part of the problem here might be because of how Darkness and Light were originally just one episode, Fire, that got split up, and we ended up with no Scott/Chloe scenes in Darkness. People didn't exactly forget about their scenes in Air, but it was maybe more out of mind than if it had only been the previous episode.
Maybe. Just a thought.
Originally posted by Ouroboros View PostYou didn't like Lee, Baltar, Six, Chief Tyrol, Callie, Adama Senior, Roslin, Starbuck, Boomer, Anders and Tigh? Just about everyone on BSG got sucked into a romance plot at some point or another. Even the better writing and acting couldn't convince me that putting say, Tigh, into a romance plot was something I wanted to watch though.
I also just didn't like certain characters like Starbuck, but even with the ones I did like the romances really started to drag on the patience when you looked around and noticed that literally every main character was somehow involved in one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IcarusAbides View PostHow has this thread got turned into yet another SGU Vs BSG thread. Seriously.
Something...something...something...complete.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ZoSo View PostNaw, really? No offense or anything but you are obviously incapable of seeing this situation for what it is. I agree with your point about the talk between Chloe and Scott being worth more "points" or whatever, but you just refuse to acknowledge the fact that she's using Eli, among other -yes- stereotypical things.
Kaiphantom: I'd tone down the hostility a notch or two, you aren't scoring any "points". Or maybe you are...
And no offense taken as I do I appreciate your viewpoint. I find it very interesting.
Originally posted by KaiphantomI'm just gonna say this. When you are scheduled to parachute out of an airplane, do you assume you already know what to do? Or do you listen to the guy with a bunch of experience?
Originally posted by KaiphantomI'm trying to tell you exactly what it's like from a Real Life nerd's perspective. Since we're generally turned down, and used by women a lot, we know the signs. We tend to have the perspective of being able to sit back and observe these women running around. After time, it becomes predictable. We easily point out all the signs to each other.
Originally posted by KaiphantomEven among women I do value as friends because they don't treat me as something to use, I can notice some of the behaviors. But these rare women I *can* talk to about it, and they apologize and change, not even realizing they were doing it because it was subconscious.
We have yet to see this happen between Chloe and Eli.
All I am saying is you are already putting Chloe, Scott and Eli in a box instead of letting the story and the characters develop. Eventually Scott and Eli are going to come to a head over Chloe. Once that happens, I may just agree with you but until that happens, or until Chloe has 'the talk' with Eli I am going to give all three the benefit of the doubt.
Originally posted by KaiphantomYou're female. That means you like to see good relationships in most of your shows. You're generally a shipper, and so that colors your viewpoint. I wouldn't doubt that there are already plenty of women who are going SQUEEE over the thought of a Scott/Chloe pairing and busy writing fanfiction where they live happily ever after. Probably where Chloe changes Scott's "bad boy" ways, which is a fantasy most females have.
For the record, I am not a shipper. I thunk one character who happens to be a "geek" because I connect with the character and the actor is a phenomenal actor who I happen to like his work. I only did one 'ship' and that was Zelenka and Weir because we had alot of fun on that thread, not because I took it seriously. In fact I avoid most ships as I don't care for the SQUEE factor.
And, no I do not need to see good relationships on most of my shows. I like to see relationships that have conflict and watch how people work them out, granted I may like a happy ending but I am not going to lose any sleep if it doesn't work out.
Originally posted by KaiphantomWith that, I'll be done. As others have pointed out, you can't see he situation for what it is. I really feel like I'm trying to debate with a hardcore Shipper who won't take any flak for their chosen couple, and I know how pointless that gets.
Originally posted by KaiphantomSo, I apologize if I came across a bit hostile, but it's born more out of frustration than anything else. It's hard to argue rationally against irrationality, and that tends to make nerds a bit steamed.sigpic
www.facebook.com/pages/DavidNyklFans/402742713123717
Comment
-
I know I said I'd be done, but going to point out this last bit, for all the good it will do.
Originally posted by Rosehawk View PostWhat is your point here? If I was going to parachute, I would listen to the instructor - don't understand how that relates to Eli or Scott and Chloe's relationship with either of them. If Scott was the expert, I'd listen to him, if Eli was, I'd listen to him. Same with a relationship, I'd listen to what the guy was telling me, or not telling me, and go from there.
You're not a nerd, so please listen to one who has more experience in it.
Chloe is using Eli. It might be subconscious, but it's there. You'll see more of it as the series progresses. If it is subconscious, she won't even realize it until someone points it out to her. I expect denial then, and especially anger if it's Eli saying it.
You're projecting what you want to see, rather than what's there. It's understandable, but right now, you're reacting much like the women I've described in previous posts. Very rarely do any of them want to ask themselves the uncomfortable questions.
There's no way to know if there's any sort of real emotional bond between Scott and Chloe right now. The relationships that start out sexual very early between two people who haven't known each other very long, are statistically very unlikely to last. That's because the feelings aren't based on anything more concrete then physical pleasure.
People learn this in sociology courses. One or the other will eventually lose interest, or find something new. Scott seems to do this fairly often, if what we've seen so far is standard for him. So I predict him breaking it off first, once he gets tired of her.
If you really think it only takes one conversation to develop a strong emotional bond, then you're exactly what most guys want to see when they step into a bar or go to pickup chicks in other places. Men have a code word for that: Easy. Just have to push the right emotional buttons to get what you want. And yes, I've done this before, too. It's amazing how well it works, because most women steadfastly believe it's not possible, which makes them weak to it.
Not saying Scott is deliberate in it, as the more "popular" guys tend to do it by default.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phantom6 View PostI have NEVER said this about a character in a tv show.
That's more than 20 years of experience with television both good and bad.
I REALLY was hoping Lt. Scott would die. I still hope for it. I absolutely can NOT stand the character.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Landers View PostI too wish he had remained stuck in that crack.For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future. -Jeremiah 29:11
Comment
-
Originally posted by IcarusAbides View PostGive it time, you may change your mind.
I can't stand the way the character is written. He's a thick headed libido with legs.
I want the character to get stuck on a planet and left behind. I'm not cruel though, make it a very nice planet with plenty of food and water.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phantom6 View PostHighly doubtful.
I can't stand the way the character is written. He's a thick headed libido with legs.
I want the character to get stuck on a planet and left behind. I'm not cruel though, make it a very nice planet with plenty of food and water.sigpic
Comment
Comment