Originally posted by jelgate
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rush's actions, situation and how will he get out of it?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jelgate View PostTell that to Franklin. Tell that to everyone's lives he risked in Air
Now the question is did young think through his actions in advance or was it a heat of the moment thing. remember he could of had the "chat" on the ship.
Tell that to Sen. Armstrong
I would point out that on a whim, Rush stranded 80 people on the far side of the universe on a derelict ship.
2) They did not know it was derilict at the time.
Personally, I would have brought the evidence of Rush's actions out in the open for everyone to see. It would have destroyed his credibility on the ship. I think that would be a more effective way to deal with him than stranding him on a planet.
The only danger that I have ever seen from dialing from a high power source that might explode during transit is the blast following through the wormhole and damaging the destination gate. If Rush was afraid of this possibility then he could have dialed the Alpha Site or picked an uninhabited planet.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hartman View PostI read through this whole thread now and so far it seems that most people are burning Col. Young for marooning Dr. Rush on this planet. Has anyone stopped to realise that civilian law does not apply here. For all intents and purposes until he relived himself of command, he was the captain of the ship. Maritime law applies. Dr. Rush's actions were mutinous by his own admission. A Captain of a vessel is expected and required to put down mutinies with all force required, up to, and including deadly force. And far from being called to task for the action, the Captain would be commended.
Here is where I see the problem for Col. Young lies. He was not in command at the time he marooned Dr. Rush. He had relinquished command, and therefor violated the chain of command. And I think he knew he did, and that's why he lied.
But I would never try to argue whether or not Young's actions are moral, legal, or justifiable. Everything on Destiny is gray area of such things by default. His actions, however, were most certainly short-sighted. Keeping Rush around, holding the video record over his head, would have been a much stronger move. It would allow Young to retain authority, and have an invaluable resource in form of Rush's knowledge.
As such, I do not see Young fit to lead Destiny expedition. By far the best scenario would have been to have a strong leader with level head who is willing to listen to Rush's advice, but also keep him at bay when the time comes. There is no such character aboard Destiny. Or at least, nobody who has shown themselves to be such character yet.
Between Yong's temper and Rush's sociopathic pragmatism, I would have preferred later, as I have explained. With Rush out of the picture... I don't know. They might as well declare democracy and rule by referendum. Won't be any worse than with any one of them in charge.
Originally posted by hartman View PostAs for how Dr. Rush will get out of his predicament, I haven't the foggiest. He has no resources, no food, no water, and one crash landed alien ship, about the size of a shuttle.
Comment
-
Originally posted by K^2 View PostThese are excellent points.
But I would never try to argue whether or not Young's actions are moral, legal, or justifiable. Everything on Destiny is gray area of such things by default. His actions, however, were most certainly short-sighted. Keeping Rush around, holding the video record over his head, would have been a much stronger move. It would allow Young to retain authority, and have an invaluable resource in form of Rush's knowledge.
As such, I do not see Young fit to lead Destiny expedition. By far the best scenario would have been to have a strong leader with level head who is willing to listen to Rush's advice, but also keep him at bay when the time comes. There is no such character aboard Destiny. Or at least, nobody who has shown themselves to be such character yet.
Between Yong's temper and Rush's sociopathic pragmatism, I would have preferred later, as I have explained. With Rush out of the picture... I don't know. They might as well declare democracy and rule by referendum. Won't be any worse than with any one of them in charge.
Which in Stargate is a sure sign that we'll be seeing him again.
For me whether Col. Young should be in command is a simple problem, and it comes down to this. He was placed in command of a military unit by a superior Officer in the chain of command. Until Command sees fit to replace him he is in charge.
This is perhaps a bit pig-headed of me but I simply cannot see any way for a military force to be effective without a clear chain of command.
As to what you say about the best thing he should have done, I agree to a point. It would have certainly solved the problem in the short term, however Col. Young would then have to be would then have had to worry about what new mutinous act Dr. Rush was up to. And I strongly doubt that Dr. Rush would have been too concerned about the tape as the evidence against him was nonexistent and the Col. was acting ( it seemed to me) on a strong hunch. It would definitely had made for one heck of a plotline.
My problem with the Colonel's decision was not that he decided to maroon him, as I said before. But that he made that decision without the authority to act. He had not gotten his Authority back until the day after he returned to the ship.
I'm not sure that given the circumstances, there was a right response to Dr. Rush's actions.
I just don't know... Like you said, it is a moral and legal gray area.
One the one hand Col. Young committed an act of murder as he was not in command. On the other hand Col. Young stepped down from command because Dr. Rush in essence staged a coup, and when the Col. realized what was actually going on, marooned him.
Did the Col. have the authority to maroon Dr. Rush. and if so why did he lie about what actually happened?
The more I think about this the more that one act makes less sense. When I first posted I was thinking about this from just the one angle. Problem is how will the SGC replace a commander whom they find incompetent (if indeed they do decide to replace him) when they cannot physically reach him? They cannot simply send in a replacement. An election is out of the question as the only elected leader the U.S. military will follow is the President.
If it sounds as if I am trying to wrap my head around the moral problems involved in this as I am typing, you would be right. Problem is I LIKE Col. Young.
Comment
-
Originally posted by K^2 View PostThese are excellent points.
But I would never try to argue whether or not Young's actions are moral, legal, or justifiable. Everything on Destiny is gray area of such things by default. His actions, however, were most certainly short-sighted. Keeping Rush around, holding the video record over his head, would have been a much stronger move. It would allow Young to retain authority, and have an invaluable resource in form of Rush's knowledge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by garhkal View PostOk. How much area is destroyed when a gate goes critical. A LOT. Had they gated to the alpha site it would be gone (well had the explosion transfered). And if they went to another uninhabited planet, and the gate was blown up/damaged, how would they get home? Either way they are stranded.Currently watching: Dark Matter, 12 Monkeys, Doctor Who, Under the Dome, The Mentalist, The Messengers, The Last Ship, Elementary, Dominion, The Whispers, Extant, Olympus, Da Vinci's Demons, Vikings
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shpinxinator View PostI agree...and personally I think Young did things that were WAY more ethically questionable than Rush BUT that doesn't mean he is a BAD guy...he lost his temper...not the mark of a psycho...maybe the mark of a bad leader though
Assault and battery and murder within a short span of time. He's on his way of becoming a violent career criminal.
Originally posted by Girlbot View PostRush is a loose cannon, deceptive, and unprdictable. that's not the kind of person I want controlling the course of my life. You have said that Rush simply doesn't care about other people, I agree. IMO that doesn't make for a good leader.
Originally posted by hartman View PostI read through this whole thread now and so far it seems that most people are burning Col. Young for marooning Dr. Rush on this planet. Has anyone stopped to realise that civilian law does not apply here. For all intents and purposes until he relived himself of command, he was the captain of the ship. Maritime law applies. Dr. Rush's actions were mutinous by his own admission. A Captain of a vessel is expected and required to put down mutinies with all force required, up to, and including deadly force. And far from being called to task for the action, the Captain would be commended.
If you kill off all of the scientists, the rest are screwed. Using the logic of "Survival of the fittest", a scientist should be the captain.
Who made Young captain? Also, Maritime law or not, Young committed murder and then covered it up. So, no, it was not the punishment for a mutinous subordinate. It was the cowardly act of a selfish man.
Originally posted by Commander Zelix View PostThe poster you were responding to was right. They could easily have dialed a gate within the system. They wouldn't be stranded since those planets are reachable by ship and that is IF the gate would even be damaged. I think the show as shown many times that Rush speeches, excuses and concerns for others are only hypocritical as he only care about himself (and his personal quest/mission on the Destiny).
How does this translate into that Rush deserves to die of starvation and dehydration on a desert planet (or that Young had the right to do that to him and then lie about how he got trapped in a "rock slide", which is funny seeing as how most of the planet was sand).
Comment
-
Anyone get the idea that Young possibly took rush's supply bag, and his electronic equipment? Young was looking at the ship/shuttle after he head butted rush, like if something was looking at him Or Young may have plotted so Young couldnt miracilously fix the ship when he woke up.
I suspect people are on the ship, or rush may find a way to dial a gate adress to another world if he somehow memorized any seeded gate addresses. Also teh ship could have an EM damping/dampening? field, to "mask" that it was out of power espeically with SGU's primitive sensors.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rancher View PostThere are a few possibilities here.Spoiler:And less likely, Rush could take the power source from the ship, boost the gate, and "somehow" get it to dial the 9 chevron address to the ship (ship is ~close, shouldn't take much extra power).
Dr. Rush finds a way inside the ship, salvages the power supply, Adapts it to the Stargate, and connects to a Stargate in the next galaxy in Destiny's path.
Connecting to the next galaxy would be more feasible. He has knowledge of the seeded planets ahead of Destiny, Destiny's FTL is not hyperspace, therefore, slower, much slower than a Stargate wormhole.
Besides, Destiny's Stargate is off-line during the FTL, and most of the time, Destiny is traveling in FTL.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phenomenological View PostI totally disagree. I'd trust Rush a HELL of a lot more than Young.
Or, come down with a sickness on an AWAY mission with him being the only one who could help you.
Otherwise, you can trust him with your life.
For a moment there, I thought he was in trouble.
Comment
Comment