I doubt O'neil would have vented the atmosphere if it where Daniel. Carters situation was different, the planet was about to explode and there was 200+ people on the ship. Rush was left on the planet because he framed Young for Murder and tampered with a crime scene, so he saw a dead man and thought I can use that is premeditation where as Young stranded Rush on a snap witch was wrong. They called a truce after Divided let bigons be bigons.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
In Young we trust
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bobsuncorp View PostI agree that it has been a major plot point, but that doesn't make it something we should take as gospel. I think the writers are creating an arc for his character, using the crew's feelings to portray a lack of confidence makes the viewer question his competence, and thus makes his "comeback" even more of an achievement. How many people honestly thought he had gone off the deep end when he put Telford through the wringer, yet he turned out to know something we didn't, and turned out to be right. It is an excellent storytelling device, and redemption of our heroes is always good to see, but they have to fall before they can get up. It just seems to me that no sooner does he prove himself than he is being ragged on for his next "mistake".
For a military commander, questioning your own competence can be as dangerous as the lack of competence. The difference is that sometimes an emergency situation can force said commander to put their feelings aside, and because the skill set still exists, they can shoot from bad to excellent very quickly. Young turned the Destiny command down because as he said to O'Neill "I don't think it's still in me, Sir". In those circumstances sometimes it takes someone else to recognise the talent and convince the other of their competence. O'Neill believed in Young and still does.
Indecisive? One time he hesitated for a few seconds (and be honest if he had pushed the button straight away it would have taken 60 seconds to evacuate the gateroom and it took 5 seconds for the LA members to put on breathing apparatus and get the door openers in place) and now he is not fit for command?
(Volker looks at Brody thoughtfully.)
VOLKER: A minute or so?
BRODY: That's about right.
Yep, even more than a minute - a minute or so! That might not seem like a long time but trust me, that's a long damned time! Maybe the initial plan would have worked, sure. Maybe. But it sure as hell didn't take Kiva's people that long to put on masks and get those doors open, so maybe it wouldn't have accomplished anything other than to severely piss her off and make any negotiations later something impossible to carry out. Again, see above - bagging on Young is a favorite pastime, it wouldn't have mattered what he did.
See I see something else, I see him about to put his plan into action. Again I go back to the ending where he was torturing Telford. The end of the episode ocurred before we found out what his plan was. That has happened again, its just we have to wait months instead of days before we find out what it is and that he didn't deserve the blame after all.
Comment
-
I also saw in a post on another thread someone suggested that before he returned the 4 LA members back to Kiva he ran them through the stone room and had them "replaced" with SGC personnel. 4 trojan horses just waiting for the moment to strike.
For some reason the person who put that theory forward didn't like it, but I LOVE IT! That is just the kind of plan that I am talking about."The laws of favours are amongst the most fundamental in the multiverse. The first law is: nobody asks for just one favour; the second request (after the granting of the first favour), prefaced by ‘and can I be really cheeky…?’ is the asking of the second favour. If the aforesaid second request is not granted, the second law ensures that the need for any gratitude for the first favour is nullified, and in accordance with the third law the favour giver has not done any favours at all, and the favour field collapses." - Terry Pratchett.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bobsuncorp View PostI also saw in a post on another thread someone suggested that before he returned the 4 LA members back to Kiva he ran them through the stone room and had them "replaced" with SGC personnel. 4 trojan horses just waiting for the moment to strike.
For some reason the person who put that theory forward didn't like it, but I LOVE IT! That is just the kind of plan that I am talking about.
Comment
-
Originally posted by xxxevilgrinxxx View Postthat's provided they have control of the stone room and have someone to watch over what's happening and also, those 4 LA guys that you've switched with are now on YOUR side of the fence, capable of just as much trouble, so you've got to have someone watch over them as well. Plus, if anyone on the other side suspects, you're looking at four more of your own people dead. It's always the details
The biggest problem I see is that Kiva would spot the Trojans before they were ready to move. She has already proven herself to be very clever at that sort of thing."The laws of favours are amongst the most fundamental in the multiverse. The first law is: nobody asks for just one favour; the second request (after the granting of the first favour), prefaced by ‘and can I be really cheeky…?’ is the asking of the second favour. If the aforesaid second request is not granted, the second law ensures that the need for any gratitude for the first favour is nullified, and in accordance with the third law the favour giver has not done any favours at all, and the favour field collapses." - Terry Pratchett.
Comment
-
I see Young as another obstacle that the rest of the Destineers have to overcome. He needs to be relieved of command before he kills them all.
Exactly what am I to trust about him? How he let the ship fall in the hands of the Lucian Alliance? How he didn't share with anyone what the hell he was trying to achieve with Telford and nearly killed both Telford and Rush? Would it kill him to tell Scott what he had in mind instead of expecting him to follow him blindly like his faithful pit bull, Greer? How while Rush was frying his brains on the chair, Young let his other brilliant scientist go down on the planet to play explorer? And lost him, of course. How he has tried to kill Rush on numerous occasions? The fact that he marooned him then lied about it and continued lying.
I don't undrestand his newfound morals. He was perfectly willing to kill both Rush and Chloe and blow up Destiny shooting recklessly back when the Blues attacked. Now all of a sudden he can't bear to hurt one person to save everyone? What happened to acceptable losses? Or it doesn't work that way when it's his buddy?
I don't think it's because he has PTSD or whatever. He's just dangerously incompetent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yanna View PostI see Young as another obstacle that the rest of the Destineers have to overcome. He needs to be relieved of command before he kills them all.
Originally posted by yanna View PostExactly what am I to trust about him? How he let the ship fall in the hands of the Lucian Alliance?
Originally posted by yanna View PostHow he didn't share with anyone what the hell he was trying to achieve with Telford and nearly killed both Telford and Rush?
Originally posted by yanna View PostWould it kill him to tell Scott what he had in mind instead of expecting him to follow him blindly like his faithful pit bull, Greer?
Originally posted by yanna View PostHow while Rush was frying his brains on the chair, Young let his other brilliant scientist go down on the planet to play explorer? And lost him, of course.
Originally posted by yanna View PostHow he has tried to kill Rush on numerous occasions? The fact that he marooned him then lied about it and continued lying.
Originally posted by yanna View PostI don't undrestand his newfound morals. He was perfectly willing to kill both Rush and Chloe and blow up Destiny shooting recklessly back when the Blues attacked. Now all of a sudden he can't bear to hurt one person to save everyone? What happened to acceptable losses? Or it doesn't work that way when it's his buddy?
Evacuating the air out of the gateroom would (he believed) have killed 2 people not just 1. And he didn't do it because of RUSH not Telford. By that point he had realised he made the wrong decision with Rush and wasn't going to do it again.
Originally posted by yanna View PostI don't think it's because he has PTSD or whatever. He's just dangerously incompetent.Last edited by bobsuncorp; 17 June 2010, 02:02 PM."The laws of favours are amongst the most fundamental in the multiverse. The first law is: nobody asks for just one favour; the second request (after the granting of the first favour), prefaced by ‘and can I be really cheeky…?’ is the asking of the second favour. If the aforesaid second request is not granted, the second law ensures that the need for any gratitude for the first favour is nullified, and in accordance with the third law the favour giver has not done any favours at all, and the favour field collapses." - Terry Pratchett.
Comment
-
In the 3 parts of "Air" I liked him. It was obvious he was trying his best, and was willing to sacrifice himself to save the crew. In Darkness, I could tell he was a bit antagonistic to Rush, but overall he seemed to handle it decently and trusted Rush on the power issue.
At the end of "Light," though, I couldn't believe it when he stood there and basically accused Rush of holding back information or misleading the crew.
From there, it was downhill, after he made bad decision after bad decision, culminating with him marooning Rush. The only bright spot was him stepping him down and assigning Scott to investigate the murder, and stepping down afterward rather than have doubt among the crew.
But yes, he has been very dictatorish. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. For those young defenders, even HE admitted it in Faith I think: "Look, they didn't try to take over because I was doing a bang-up job." He admitted he was doing poorly enough that people really wanted him gone. This is when I started to like him again, because he seemed to be trying to take a more diplomatic and conciliatory approach; in short, character growth.
With Incursion, though, I have to say I still see his flaws as being unable to make the really tough calls, which made me question how he became a colonel in the first place. Unless he learns to do so, he does not belong in command. I've noticed the pattern that, with quite a few of the "right" decisions he's made, have not been out of concern... but out of a desire for death for self-destruction. He's quick to try and sacrifice himself. That's not someone you want in charge.
So, who should lead? It's a fair question. I'm not sure myself, so I'd like to see some others step up to see what they can do. Rush, much as I love the guy, his coldly logical style wouldn't sit well with the crew, and he has no real desire to lead... just to conduct science and study the ship.
Wray? I actually like to see her in charge for a fairly long time, and see how she handles under the difficult choices. Maybe she's better, maybe she's worse, but I won't know until I see it.
So rather than defend Young with a the irrational fervor of a religious fundamentalist, I'll call him out using logic. No, I don't really trust him as a leader. Trust him to make the necessary self-sacrifice? Sure, but that's about it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Avenger View PostRush was pretty greasy early in the season and he was the one responsible for everyone being on Destiny. Young not trusting him and accusing him of withholding information and misleading the crew wasn't off base.
How would you like it if I said: "Avenger, you seem greasy to me. You are deliberately withholding information, because you know I'm right and insist on being different just to troll the thread."
Makes me seem stupid, eh?
Comment
-
Like it or not, first impressions are difficult to change. One good deed isn't going to be enough to erase a poor first impression, particularly something as massive as stranding everyone billions of light years away from home with no chance of getting home.I'm not an actor. I just play one on TV.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kaiphantom View Post....
So rather than defend Young with a the irrational fervor of a religious fundamentalist, I'll call him out using logic......
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kaiphantom View PostAt the end of "Light," though, I couldn't believe it when he stood there and basically accused Rush of holding back information or misleading the crew.
Originally posted by Kaiphantom View PostBut yes, he has been very dictatorish. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. For those young defenders, even HE admitted it in Faith I think: "Look, they didn't try to take over because I was doing a bang-up job." He admitted he was doing poorly enough that people really wanted him gone."The laws of favours are amongst the most fundamental in the multiverse. The first law is: nobody asks for just one favour; the second request (after the granting of the first favour), prefaced by ‘and can I be really cheeky…?’ is the asking of the second favour. If the aforesaid second request is not granted, the second law ensures that the need for any gratitude for the first favour is nullified, and in accordance with the third law the favour giver has not done any favours at all, and the favour field collapses." - Terry Pratchett.
Comment
-
I think Young is a fundementally good person who is in way over his head. That said I don't think anyone else in this circumstance with these people could do much better than Young has. I think they may not have made the mistakes Young has made, but to assume they wouldn't have simply made different mistakes is foolish.
As Young said from the get go, "These are the wrong people." Part of the reason the SG-teams work so well is I imagine they are carefully selected so that their skills compliment each other and they work together. This is a group of refugees trying to hack it out as best they can. No one would be able to create a happy go lucky team in this environment.All plot and no character makes for a dull story... All plot and no character makes for a dull story... All plot and no character makes for a dull story... All plot and no character makes for a dull story...
"Scott isn't out. Actually, he'll probably soon get back in, then out, then in, then out, then in, with rhythm and stamina." reddevil 4/22/2010
Comment
Comment