Originally posted by s09119
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
When torture is right
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Yes, I agree that torture was appropriate. Although Telford was harmed, Young obtained the neccesaary info to prepare for the Lucian Alliance and a devise a defensive plan. Essentially torture can be right in some cases, where the harm of one being can save the lives of many others.Also, his actions were beneficial since by killing and then reviving him , Young was able to get Telford back as himself
and Telford was therefore able to be helpful in a few ways [ i.e making his move, convincing the Lucian Alliance
of TJ'S usefulness].Abbas Karimjee
www.abbaskarimjee.wordpress.com
The latest Stargate Atlantis, SG1 , Universe , movies and the future of Stargate news.
Comment
-
What Young was doing was not torture. He was performing a version of the Jaffa's Rite of Malshuraan. It was done to Teal'c with success in Threshold, we shall see if it was successful here, or if Telford is shammin'."There's not a little boy born who wouldn't tear the world apart to save his mummy... and this little boy can." --The Doctor.
"The plastic tips at the ends of shoelaces are called Aglets. Their true purpose is sinister."--The Question.
BAD WOLF!!!
Comment
-
As far as I'm concerned, with the revelation that Young did what he did because he specifically wanted Telford to die a little bit to break the brainwashing, it can no longer be called torture. It's more like..."treatment" for Telford's condition (of being brainwashed). This in turn renders all of this, and by extention the 30+ pages of debate in that other thread, moot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PG15 View PostAs far as I'm concerned, with the revelation that Young did what he did because he specifically wanted Telford to die a little bit to break the brainwashing, it can no longer be called torture. It's more like..."treatment" for Telford's condition (of being brainwashed). This in turn renders all of this, and by extention the 30+ pages of debate in that other thread, moot.Click the banner or episode links to visit the virtual continuations of Stargate!Previous Episode: 11x03 "Shore Leave" | Previous Episode: 6x04 "Nightfall" | Now Airing: 3x06 "Eldest"The Continuing Stargate Wiki | Stargate: Avalon l The New "Ark of Truth" | Stargate: Universe Reviews | Banner designs by Alx
Comment
-
I'm going to Godwin this thread, but it needs to be said.
The Nuremburg trials showed that "just following orders" is no excuse. Millions of people were tortured, and the soliders under the command of the big shots who gave those orders, were just as culpable as the commanders.
Torture. Is. Wrong.
And if you carry out an order to torture someone, you are just as guilty.
As PG15 said, what Young did was more like a treatment, but he should have explained that to the people under his command. True, technically Scott should have... but as Sheppard told a different Col Everett in SGA, if he didn't include Weir in things, he'd lose the respect of everyone. There is more to leading then simply barking out orders.
Comment
-
Originally posted by s09119 View PostMore or less. What he did may be classified as a form of torture, given the method, but it was the only remedy he had on hand.
I'm not an expert on torture, but as far as I know, torture is basically giving someone physical/mental/emotional trauma until they crack under the pressure and do what you want them to do, in theory. What Young did had nothing to do with that - there was no "cracking under the pressure". It was more like getting a shot for a vaccine or various other painful medical treatments - yeah, it feels pretty uncomfortable, but that's just an unfortunate side effect of the procedure, not its intended effect.
Comment
-
Originally posted by s09119 View PostFor all the people who complained that under no circumstances is torturing a prisoner acceptable... I hope "Incursion, Part 1" proved that you were mistaken. Had they not tortured Telford, everyone on that ship would most-likely be dead or suffering even further losses. Young knew what he had to do and he did it, and he no doubt saved many innocent lives in doing so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DigiFluid View Post
So not only did Young commit a monstrous crime, it also produced no tangible results.
It was a very quick Rite of Malsharan, and that's what Young intended. The tangible result is that Telford is back to normal (or so we think, anyway). Young committed no crime, though some can argue (and some already have argued) that he made a mistake in not telling other people about it.
Though, like I said earlier, the first few minutes of this episode rendered most of last week's torture discussions completely pointless, and that's freaking hilarious to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by s09119 View PostFor all the people who complained that under no circumstances is torturing a prisoner acceptable... I hope "Incursion, Part 1" proved that you were mistaken. Had they not tortured Telford, everyone on that ship would most-likely be dead or suffering even further losses. Young knew what he had to do and he did it, and he no doubt saved many innocent lives in doing so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PG15 View PostIt was a very quick Rite of Malsharan, and that's what Young intended. The tangible result is that Telford is back to normal (or so we think, anyway). Young committed no crime, though some can argue (and some already have argued) that he made a mistake in not telling other people about it.
For all young knew, he could've killed telford, brought him back, and achieved nothing. It was a gamble. He just got lucky was all.
As far as "When is torture right?", I'd say only when you know the person is in possession of the information you're looking for, and only depending on what said information is that you're looking for.
Comment
-
Originally posted by s09119 View PostFor all the people who complained that under no circumstances is torturing a prisoner acceptable... I hope "Incursion, Part 1" proved that you were mistaken. Had they not tortured Telford, everyone on that ship would most-likely be dead or suffering even further losses. Young knew what he had to do and he did it, and he no doubt saved many innocent lives in doing so.
BUT I WILL NOW make an apology to all those i slammed that he could not know of the right of Mal'sha-ron (or however it is spelled) as both he and Telford seemed to know of it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by s09119 View PostFor all the people who complained that under no circumstances is torturing a prisoner acceptable... I hope "Incursion, Part 1" proved that you were mistaken. Had they not tortured Telford, everyone on that ship would most-likely be dead or suffering even further losses. Young knew what he had to do and he did it, and he no doubt saved many innocent lives in doing so.
Comment
-
Young did it for two things:
1: to break the brainwashing, similar to what happened to Teal'c
2: to test his fellow people. including Scott. who clearly didn't trust Young enough.
also telford revealed that he had read about the technique and that it had been applied a few times but he hadn't thought about it.
as to the predictability: predictable for longtime fans, not so for new fans
Comment
-
I was vehemently against the torture in Subversion, but now knowing that Young still thought Telford was under the influence of brainwashing and was trying to Mal'Sharaan him, I think what he did was right. It has nothing to do with the fact that they were able to prepare for the attack. I'm only okay with just because it wasn't torture. He wasn't trying to break him to get information, he was trying to un wash his brain like they did to Teal'c in 'Threshold'.
Perfecto!
Comment
Comment