Just watched this show, it's great. I was thinking about some of the time travel ideas.
My first question was, why at the end was he his own grandfather? If that was an altered timeline, then wouldn't it revert to the original timeline? The reality is, stopping Baal WAS the original timeline, it just worked out in the end that they stopped him. In other words, shooting up Baal as he walked through the Stargate was in the original Stargate timeline.
Also it reminds me of Bill And Ted's Bogus Journey, where the bad guy wants to change the timeline and says, "time will tell", and the other guy responds, "time has told". In other words, if Baal had been successful in changing the timeline, then none of Stargate as we know it would have ever happened, what they think of as their original timeline would have been an alternate timeline and would not have ever happened if Baal had been successful.
The one thing that I still don't get is a paradox they intentionally added. When Cameron Mitchell goes back to 1928, he goes on the boat and kills Baal. He then lives out the rest of his life, has a son, that son has a son. But his grandson is HIM. His grandson is destined to go back in time as him, and live out the rest of his life in 1928 to stop Baal. But how genetically, could his grandson be identical to him after two generations? This is the paradox. There are two Cameron Mitchells in one timeline, and somehow one of them gave birth to the other. Difficult to understand this one I think it is more of a paradox than anything.
My first question was, why at the end was he his own grandfather? If that was an altered timeline, then wouldn't it revert to the original timeline? The reality is, stopping Baal WAS the original timeline, it just worked out in the end that they stopped him. In other words, shooting up Baal as he walked through the Stargate was in the original Stargate timeline.
Also it reminds me of Bill And Ted's Bogus Journey, where the bad guy wants to change the timeline and says, "time will tell", and the other guy responds, "time has told". In other words, if Baal had been successful in changing the timeline, then none of Stargate as we know it would have ever happened, what they think of as their original timeline would have been an alternate timeline and would not have ever happened if Baal had been successful.
The one thing that I still don't get is a paradox they intentionally added. When Cameron Mitchell goes back to 1928, he goes on the boat and kills Baal. He then lives out the rest of his life, has a son, that son has a son. But his grandson is HIM. His grandson is destined to go back in time as him, and live out the rest of his life in 1928 to stop Baal. But how genetically, could his grandson be identical to him after two generations? This is the paradox. There are two Cameron Mitchells in one timeline, and somehow one of them gave birth to the other. Difficult to understand this one I think it is more of a paradox than anything.
Comment