Some people take issue with original SG-1 dieing in the past, leaving us with a second SG-1 at the end of the movie. Does it really matter? They are both the real SG-1.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Original SG-1 vs. Restored SG-1
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Our SG-1 is seen until Teal'c and Vala poof away followed by Jack's death. Our Sam and Cam are seen until they are killed by Jaffa in the alternate timeline. Our Cam is last seen in 1939 after he killed Ba'al and three Jaffa. Our SG-1 is seen again at the end of the movie. Both versions of SG-1 are the same right up until Vala's vanishing act.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jenks View PostIf by original you mean 'our' SG-1, they didn't die, the only time you see 'our' SG-1 is at the end of the movie.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daniel Jackson View PostOur SG-1 is seen until Teal'c and Vala poof away followed by Jack's death. Our Sam and Cam are seen until they are killed by Jaffa in the alternate timeline. Our Cam is last seen in 1939 after he killed Ba'al and three Jaffa. Our SG-1 is seen again at the end of the movie. Both versions of SG-1 are the same right up until Vala's vanishing act.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daniel Jackson View PostOur SG-1 is seen until Teal'c and Vala poof away followed by Jack's death. Our Sam and Cam are seen until they are killed by Jaffa in the alternate timeline. Our Cam is last seen in 1939 after he killed Ba'al and three Jaffa. Our SG-1 is seen again at the end of the movie. Both versions of SG-1 are the same right up until Vala's vanishing act.
One SG-1 resides in a timeline where the Achilles made it intact to Boston.
Another SG-1 resides in a timeline where the Achilles still made it to Boston, but had a whole blown in the side of her and a crew with Cam onboard.
Thus, they're different SG-1s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daniel Jackson View PostYou've explained differences between people living in the early 20th century. How, exactly, does this make restored SG-1 different from original SG-1? The SG-1 we see at the end of the movie is identical to the SG-1 we see at the beginning. Why do you disregard this fact?Last edited by jenks; 15 August 2008, 11:22 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jenks View PostBecause it's not true. They're not the same, they can't be.
The fact that there are two Mitchell's in that timeline should make that obvious...
not to mention the fact that causality makes it impossible anyway.
Let's take Teal'c for example. To apply your our character method, we have our Teal'c at the beginning and end of the movie. Alternate Teal'c is in the alternate timeline, First Prime to Ba'al.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daniel Jackson View PostYou've explained differences between people living in the early 20th century. How, exactly, does this make restored SG-1 different from original SG-1? The SG-1 we see at the end of the movie is identical to the SG-1 we see at the beginning. Why do you disregard this fact?
Thus, they're different.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daniel Jackson View PostBoth Mitchells lived the same life right up to Ba'al's extraction.
Trivial differences.
Let's take Teal'c for example. To apply your our character method, we have our Teal'c at the beginning and end of the movie. Alternate Teal'c is in the alternate timeline, First Prime to Ba'al.
Comment
Comment