Originally posted by amconway
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Third SG-1 movie ("Stargate Revolution") Ship Free hopes/speculation/ideas
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Amaunet View PostI agree...Most characters in the last two movies had plenty of time to shine, I don't see how this third movie will be any different
As for someone mentioning that they believed this could be the last SG-1 movie, I completely disagree. The first two sold really well, and I don't see that changing for this movie. So why would they stop making successful movies? I think we will get at least a couple more movies after this third one.sigpic
MS - "Boy, wow that's a great question!"
"...phu...ah..."
"Anyone know what SENTIENT means???"
Sunday is my favorite day for two reasons - Football and The Walking Dead
Comment
-
Originally posted by silly sally View PostSince I think this might be the last SG-1 movie I'd like as little Cam as possible, and some plot with AUs so we could have back Janet and Jacob if only for a little while...
LE: Oh, and of course Jack as the leading man and Sam and Jack undeniable CONFIRMATION
AND CONFIRMATION between Jack and Sam
Originally posted by the fifth man View PostExactly! This one won't be any different. All of SG-1 will have their moments.
As for someone mentioning that they believed this could be the last SG-1 movie, I completely disagree. The first two sold really well, and I don't see that changing for this movie. So why would they stop making successful movies? I think we will get at least a couple more movies after this third one.sigpic
Comment
-
I never really took to Cam, or Vala for that matter....I want my old team back
AND CONFIRMATION between Jack and Sam
Comment
-
I love to see them explore the threat in this Unverise that sent the Destiny team fleeing for their lives. There has to be something behind that threat.
And I would want ALL the charactors in the movie (Daniel, Sam, Teal'c, Cam, Vala and of course Jack)!!!MY CONVENTIONS:
CON*CEPT MONTREAL 2006
MARCON COLUMBUS 2007
POLARIS TORONTO 2007
CREATION STARGATE VANCOUVER 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 & 2012
GATECON VANCOUVER 2008 & 2010
VCON VANCOUVER 2010
FAN EXPO VANCOUVER 2012 & 2013
Comment
-
Originally posted by amconway View PostThe thing about that is, if they leave out characters, or comfirm a relationship, they would make as many people very unhappy as they make happy. While my own feeling is that the character of Vala skewed the show toward overt (and to my mind, somewhat questionable) humor, and that there is no Sam/Jack relationship to confirm (and hasn't been since the Zatarc incident), there are many, many people who would disagree vehemently. Their desires are equally valid, so I expect that we will see any characters whose actors are available appear in the movie, and have neither confirmation, nor denial. That way everyone will continue to be able to take what they wish from the show.
It's no different than never hearing about the Odyssey ever again- the only people that would make happy are those of us who didn't want to see that kind of ship in Stargate SG-1. It would be poor continuity to never see another 304 again, but I'd like it, just like you'd rather not see any more about a Sam and Jack romance. That doesn't make for good story-telling, though.
So while it's perfectly valid to have differing opinions over the characteristics and relative importance of any story arc, I wouldn't presume to state that not finishing it is going to let people take what they wish from the show. It won't. They can't make all of the people happy all of the time- when they try they get really twisted up just like they did with Weir in SGA.Last edited by VSS; 01 January 2009, 04:20 AM.
Comment
-
wish they make a movie that doesnt take any history from the series.
since if it's gonna be a movie that people that havent seen the show dont need 1 days lecture about what has happend in SG.
watched SG con with a friend , and i had to tell him about baal and what kinda alien he was, and who those other was.
but would like some good old exploring,guns,lazers,sg1 , a good villain,space battle
and a good storynow my brothers in arms,, i stand before you now, like our for father did in the heed of battel,let us take the steel and our honor to victory
Comment
-
But everyone won't. At some point, story arcs should be resolved, or it's just bad writing. They've revisited the Sam/Jack story several times since Divide and Conquer, with no clear resolution one way or the other and it really doesn't make most fans of that particular relationship happy to leave it in limbo- and it is (or was) a pretty big fan group, as "single issue" fan groups go.
It's no different than never hearing about the Odyssey ever again- the only people that would make happy are those of us who didn't want to see that kind of ship in Stargate SG-1. It would be poor continuity to never see another 304 again, but I'd like it, just like you'd rather not see any more about a Sam and Jack romance. That doesn't make for good story-telling, though.
So while it's perfectly valid to have differing opinions over the characteristics and relative importance of any story arc, I wouldn't presume to state that not finishing it is going to let people take what they wish from the show. It won't. They can't make all of the people happy all of the time- when they try they get really twisted up just like they did with Weir in SGA.
I wouldn't call that bad writing so much as a clear awareness that there are several points of view within the fandom. I don't think there is anything wrong with them giving 'ship fans a little something to work with, just as I don't expect them to explicitly rule it out to please people like me who don't think they'd have broken regs. As long as no one seriously demands (and I'm not implying that statements made here are meant to be taken as a line in the sand) that what they believe be made fact, to the exclusion of all other points of view, I think we're all okay. The very fact that people are calling for 'confirmation', rather than 'resolution' emphasizes what a bad idea it would be for the writers and producers to come down one way or the other on this, because every group feels just as strongly about their own personal fanon.
wish they make a movie that doesnt take any history from the series.
since if it's gonna be a movie that people that havent seen the show dont need 1 days lecture about what has happend in SG.
watched SG con with a friend , and i had to tell him about baal and what kinda alien he was, and who those other was.
but would like some good old exploring,guns,lazers,sg1 , a good villain,space battle
and a good storyLast edited by amconway; 01 January 2009, 03:18 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by amconway View PostI wouldn't call that bad writing so much as a clear awareness that there are several points of view within the fandom. I don't think there is anything wrong with them giving 'ship fans a little something to work with, just as I don't expect them to explicitly rule it out to please people like me who don't think they'd have broken regs.
Originally posted by amconway View PostAs long as no one seriously demands (and I'm not implying that statements made here are meant to be taken as a line in the sand) that what they believe be made fact, to the exclusion of all other points of view, I think we're all okay. The very fact that people are calling for 'confirmation', rather than 'resolution' emphasizes what a bad idea it would be for the writers and producers to come down one way or the other on this,
Originally posted by amconway View Postbecause every group feels just as strongly about their own personal fanon.
Comment
-
Originally posted by amconway View PostI think you better tell me your view of Threads, we may not be on the same page...
Comment
-
Sam dumped Pete and Jack said he'd always be there for her (resolution). then they promoted him and he moved to Washington which meant Sam wasn't in his COC anymore. there have been several hints at S/J throughout s9, s10, s4 of Atlantis and Continuum imo. also BW said he's writing a shall we say romantic scene (S/J) for the third SG-1 movie...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jumper_One View PostSam dumped Pete and Jack said he'd always be there for her (resolution). then they promoted him and he moved to Washington which meant Sam wasn't in his COC anymore. there have been several hints at S/J throughout *s9, s10, s4 of Atlantis and **Continuum imo. also BW said he's writing a shall we say romantic sceneS/J) for the third SG-1 movie...
**I hope you aren't talking about Fruit loop.....Last edited by madaboutdanny; 01 January 2009, 04:54 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by amconway View PostOkay, that's what I thought you meant, but I wanted to make sure. This doesn't negate what I'm saying, as there is nothing overt here,
Originally posted by amconway View Postjust things that were specifially written to be interpreted as the individual fan saw fit. The only actual canon it that Sam dumped Pete, and Jack went to Washington. Everything else is open to interpretation-there is no 'right' and 'wrong' about it. Quite purposely, in my opinion. I'm not saying that you are wrong in your belief, what I'm saying is that neither am I. That's a good thing, not a writing error. ; ) As to the romantic scene, that could mean many, many things.
Originally posted by madaboutdanny View Post*Where?
**I hope you aren't talking about Fruit loop.....
Comment
-
*Where?
**I hope you aren't talking about Fruit loop.....
yup I completely agree however it'd be kinda strange (and against regs) for her to have a pic of Jack in her Atlantis quarters if they're not in a relationship anyway it's pretty obvious imo. even some of TPTB have said they've been together since Threads ie Joe and the actors seem to agree. however that's off-screen so not canon
Comment
Comment