Originally posted by PYRO
Actually, I'm sure they didn't have to go to a museum, you know studios do rent firearms from prop houses all the time. I think perhaps some people are underestimating two fundamental facts, recreating realistic older looking firearms is harder than you might think (someone pointed out the guy's pistol being different, looked like a flare gun to me). They wanted something vaguely world war II like, *shrug*.
The other thing I'm seeing a lot of here is the underestimation of exactly how iconic weapons are in general. I am a specialist. I assure you, almost all weapons are iconic. Any firearm available in sufficient supplies that it could be rented for a tv production would be recognized.
I'd rather they had not used the early AK's--because that weapon is by definition the most widely recognized in the world--however, I'd say they did a decent job for the most part in chosing Soviet submachineguns (the PPS and PPSh). In fact, I'd venture to guess that if they had wanted consistency in design and something most people wouldn't have recognized, they'd have to have used Japanese small arms of the same period. I'm not entirely sure they are easy to rent though (many were tossed into Toyko bay), and I would be entirely uncomfortable firing blanks with them (they are horribly designed, horribly manufactured, overly complicated....).
But I also know where i want them to spend their money, and constructing a couple dozen entirely new firearms props that they aren't ever going to use again isn't it.
Comment