Originally posted by GoneShippin'
I hope not, because that's a poor business decision. If you apply the marketing life cycle of a product to the Stargate franchise, SG1 is in saturation/early decline phase, even the cash cow, if you will. But the revenues it brings in are what supports the ability to adequately launch new products, like Atlantis. Who really knows how quickly Atlantis will take off? Will it consistently pull in the ratings and subsequently the advertising $$$ to support its' existence?. They really need SG1 to continue to do well this year to offset the potential $$ loss of a new product. They SHOULD be treading more carefully, especially when they start seeing a groundswell of shipper fans stating that they'll pick up the remote if left unsatisfied. I wouldn't want to be the one defending some of their decisions to the advertisers.
If necessary, I'll volunteer to be a consultant for them for the business analysis side. Yes (wringing hands together), then I'll slip Caty and Marimba into photog/video roles, Nickatell, Tame and Ruralstar into head writing slotsand Ship Nana gets the HEAD CATERER position!! Bwahaahaahaa..Success Will Be Ours!!! Bwahaahaahaa..
did I forget to take my medication again?
Di
If necessary, I'll volunteer to be a consultant for them for the business analysis side. Yes (wringing hands together), then I'll slip Caty and Marimba into photog/video roles, Nickatell, Tame and Ruralstar into head writing slotsand Ship Nana gets the HEAD CATERER position!! Bwahaahaahaa..Success Will Be Ours!!! Bwahaahaahaa..
did I forget to take my medication again?
Di
OMG!!!!! You are too funny!!!! LMAO!!!!!!
waterfall
Comment