Originally posted by Finder of Lost Gates
Originally posted by Finder of Lost Gates
Originally posted by Finder of Lost Gates
Other"Mitchell is terrible, he shouldn't lead cause he lied"
Me"Carter lied too, so shouldn't Carter not lead as well".
Using that person's logic against them in that if a leader cannot ever lie, then Carter having lied ALSO disqualifies her from the leadership spot.
THat is the point I was making. Deevil claims to be a debating expert, yet he cannot see that, despite my stating that is what I was doing on this and other points over and over and over.
I"m sick and tired of being accused of attacking or denigrating or belittling Carter.
I'm not. I'm comparing her with Mitchell and finding that she has made a lot of the same 'mistakes' as he has.
Originally posted by Finder of Lost Gates
I'm having to defend my position, alone, against at least five people who all post roughly the same argument, claim I cannot hold my own if I don't reply to THEM, and get overly aggressive or belittling to me when they cannot refute a point I've made.
Then some genius comes on and starts telling me that I'm a horrible person for arguing my side of the debate, refuses to actually engage me in debate, preferring to write long, nasty posts about how I cannot debate and know nothing.
What ever happened to 'attack the argument, not the person' or 'show respect to all posters' or 'respect someone else's opinion'.
I'm not trying to be a pain, but if you say "Mitchell shouldn't lead because of X', I'm entitled to deconstruct that argument and point out flaws.
Comment