I have a question about "missing in action" and "killed in action", specifically as how it would relate to the Stargate universe.
MIA is, obviously, used if a soldier is missing in action in the course of performing military service. A continued status of MIA would mean they haven't been identified among the deceased, found or determined to be prisoners of war and a soldier can be considered MIA for years.
From what I could find online a person is usually only classed as KIA if their remains are positively identified or it must be determined that their body cannot be recovered (BNR).
I'm wondering if/when someone in the Stargate universe would go from MIA to KIA, considering some of the advanced technology we've seen. Using a zat three times a body could never be recovered but finding over three liters of blood from one person without a body doesn't necessarily have to mean they are (or will remain) dead if the enemy has a sarcophagus.
Would that mean all missing personnel would always remain MIA unless their dead bodies are found and taken back to base? This would perhaps not be so incredulous if most of the cover stories for the SGC weren't that personnel seem to have died in training accidents etc (and somehow there's no body), as dependents of military personnel considered MIA would still receive benefits, including pay...
Help?
MIA is, obviously, used if a soldier is missing in action in the course of performing military service. A continued status of MIA would mean they haven't been identified among the deceased, found or determined to be prisoners of war and a soldier can be considered MIA for years.
From what I could find online a person is usually only classed as KIA if their remains are positively identified or it must be determined that their body cannot be recovered (BNR).
I'm wondering if/when someone in the Stargate universe would go from MIA to KIA, considering some of the advanced technology we've seen. Using a zat three times a body could never be recovered but finding over three liters of blood from one person without a body doesn't necessarily have to mean they are (or will remain) dead if the enemy has a sarcophagus.
Would that mean all missing personnel would always remain MIA unless their dead bodies are found and taken back to base? This would perhaps not be so incredulous if most of the cover stories for the SGC weren't that personnel seem to have died in training accidents etc (and somehow there's no body), as dependents of military personnel considered MIA would still receive benefits, including pay...
Help?
Comment