Originally posted by Cautious Explorer
Your jab about McKay saving the galaxy week after week, for example. This ignores the consistent contributions of pretty much all the main characters at one point or another and episodes, such as "Quarantine," wherein McKay did little or nothing whatsoever to help matters, IMO. Besides, my understanding's that McKay heads the scientific contingent of Atlantis and is the acknowledged expert on Ancient technology. Probably theoretical physics and, by experience, Wraith technology, as well. If he can't decipher what a piece of technology's doing and fix what's broken, who can? None of the others, with the exceptions of Carter and Zelenka, are nearly so qualified. Carter's very busy as base commander, and Zelenka works for McKay. Not that both of them haven't done their share of brilliant last-minute saves.
As for the Sheppard-McKay banter, well, isn't it a forgone conclusion given their established core personalities and relationship? If Sheppard and McKay are in the same vicinity, I figure they're going to snark at each other. I'd consider it OOC for them to not do so, actually. And, yes, where one goes, the other tends to follow. Meta reasons aside, John and Rodney are pretty damn good friends who enjoy each other's company both off the clock and on. Interaction's kind of unavoidable, if you ask me, with their positions as senior staff and on the same off-world team.
Maybe you object to Sheppard and McKay exchanging so much more dialogue than Teyla and Ronon in off-world bottle episodes? (Which, BTW, you don't seem to be considering when you argue there needs to be more exploration of Pegasus.) Honestly, I think that's the modus operandi of the flagship team--Sheppard and McKay bicker; Teyla and Ronon look on, amused. I mean, neither Teyla nor Ronon exactly strike me as chatterboxes. Or, for that matter, as troublemakers. Of the sort that wander after anomalous energy readings and stumble upon secret underground nuclear bunkers.
In short, I think the reason why Sheppard and McKay are so often the instigators of the plot of the week has less to do with TPTB being uncreative or hopelessly biased in favor of them doing everything than Teyla, Ronon, and most of the other characters not being either on an exploration team or quite so enthusiastically reckless.
Regarding characterization, you must also factor in whether the character in question is amiable to revealing backstory or the like, IMO. McKay, I think everyone agrees, is more than happy to give his opinion on any topic, including his personal history. Sheppard? Teyla? Ronon? Not so much. As frustrated as I am with, say, Sheppard's past basically being a blank slate, I don't see how it's plausible to pry that information from him against his will short of interrogation (torture and alien drugs optional!) or something equally drastic.
So, McKay volunteers a bit about himself every episode while the more reserved characters don't get their heads picked apart until they meet just the right (or wrong) circumstances. I personally don't feel this imbalance is the fault of TPTB. Indeed, it's perhaps in keeping with the nature of the characters. What's more, I find the non-verbal characterization of Sheppard, Teyla, and Ronon nicely done and consistent.
Finally, that the writers relate best to McKay doesn't necessarily mean they're not developing other characters, IMO. I doubt TPTB are unaware SGA has an ensemble cast, and there are at least three or four episodes every season focused on folks who are not McKay. Not that the remaining episodes are all about McKay either.
Hope you don't mind me asking, but I'm curious as to whether you like McKay. Is it possible you feel McKay is overused partly because his presence grates on you and means less of your favorite character(s) rather than an objective measure of screentime or what his role is? The converse of folks generally wanting more of what they like, I suppose. No offense.
Comment