Originally posted by Jackie
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Court Martial of Lt Col John Sheppard
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Has anyone actually seen a court martial, for real or in a movie? Are there any differences regarding things like swearing in witnesses?
Since guilt or innocence will be determined by vote, will we need to run several polls for each count, or have multiple options and enable people to vote more than once*?
* Options would be
- Not guilty (Count 1)
- Guilty (Count 1)
- Not guilty (Count 2)
- Guilty (Count 2)
- Not guilty (Count 3)
- Guilty (Count 3)
and so on, on the understanding that everyone would vote either guilty or not guilty for every count, but we'd need a way of making sure that people weren't checking all the boxes and throwing the result.
Sig courtesy of RepliCartertje
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jackie View PostOur players so far:
Judges: ReganX--lead
Prosecutors: Ranlier--lead
Defendant: Konman72--lead
Bailiff--Jackie (me)
Expert medical witness: Vastlysuperiorstuff
Jury: Poll at end of trail--sorry roy--dyslexia--trial.
Sig courtesy of RepliCartertje
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ranlier View PostJackie's a judge, she's not setting the charges- I've already done that and falsification isn't one of them.
I would like to take a roll call of the players and cast. Please cut and past the very bottom of this post and place on your title and handle. Thank you--can't find my notes.
Originally posted by Ruffles View PostThen may I respectfully submit that your witness is not an eyewitness to the crime. The actual falsification of the document was not shown in the ep. Hearsay is not allowed at trial. I have no problem with there being a witness be it a guard or one of the bodybag guys or someone else that knew what really happened and that the report was false.
The transcript can certainly be evidence that what the document says is false, but it can't be the witness.
The case is based on forensic evidence--the tape--which is the show we watched. A transcript of the tape is available for both sides to view and cross examine. This is a forensic case.
Originally posted by ReganX View PostSheppard will need to be given a chance to speak on his own behalf - any volunteers?
If he takes the stand the prosecution would cross examine him and that--could be--tricky.
It's the judge Reganx's call if Shep request to speak on his behave.
Judges:
bailiff: Jackie (there can be 2 bailiffs if someone else wants to help me police the thread for abuse and dig up info for the judge.)
Prosecutors:
State witness and experts:
Defense team:
Defense experts and witness:
Role Players: (feel free to add if you think of any more--I added people who were not on the tape to have a chance to be character witnesses.)
(please sign up for which character you wish to play)
Rodney McKay:
Jeannie Miller:
John Sheppard:
Zelenka:
Agent Barrett:
Sam Carter:
Richard Woosely:
General Landry:
Wraith Todd:Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pegasus_SGA View PostI actually fancy doing shep's bit now. Typical woman, can never make up her mind.
In the event that we run out of volunteers here and nobody's interested in doubling up (obviously, judge, defence and prosecution wouldn't be able to play a character too but there's no reason why whoever plays one character can't take on another if they so choose), we could issue open invitations on Character threads for anyone who has yet to be cast - ie. go to the McKay fans thread for McKay, and so on.
Sig courtesy of RepliCartertje
Comment
-
Originally posted by jelgate View PostCan we court martial Peg?
Originally posted by ReganX View PostHas anyone actually seen a court martial, for real or in a movie? Are there any differences regarding things like swearing in witnesses?
Since guilt or innocence will be determined by vote, will we need to run several polls for each count, or have multiple options and enable people to vote more than once*?
* Options would be
- Not guilty (Count 1)
- Guilty (Count 1)
- Not guilty (Count 2)
- Guilty (Count 2)
- Not guilty (Count 3)
- Guilty (Count 3)
and so on, on the understanding that everyone would vote either guilty or not guilty for every count, but we'd need a way of making sure that people weren't checking all the boxes and throwing the result.
Originally posted by ReganX View PostIf she's playing Sheppard, we can.
Originally posted by Jackie View PostI am NOT the judge...just the assistant--the bailiff. My job is to make sure the court runs smoothly...in virtual court...that would be assisting with info and keeping the thread from being high jacked.
I would like to take a roll call of the players and cast. Please cut and past the very bottom of this post and place on your title and handle. Thank you--can't find my notes.
Mr Woosely brought the tape to the prosecutions attention. --the ep is security footage-- there are many crimes where a man has been convicted of murder based on forensic and video evidence alone. The episode is the forensic evidence--which is your best witness. You do not need an eyewitness to a crime to have a trail. If you did need an eyewitness than there a lot of killers in jail who would be free right now. Matter of fact--the less eyewitnesses the better--the defense will try to discredit any prosecuting eyewitness and vise versa.
The case is based on forensic evidence--the tape--which is the show we watched. A transcript of the tape is available for both sides to view and cross examine. This is a forensic case.
The judge may allow shep to speak,
his lawyer would request it first. Most defendants do not take the stand in order to prevent them from being cross examined and inadvertently making themselves look less credible to the jury.
If he takes the stand the prosecution would cross examine him and that--could be--tricky.
It's the judge Reganx's call if Shep request to speak on his behave.
Judges:
bailiff: Jackie (there can be 2 bailiffs if someone else wants to help me police the thread for abuse and dig up info for the judge.)
Prosecutors:
State witness and experts:
Defense team:
Defense experts and witness:
Role Players: (feel free to add if you think of any more--I added people who were not on the tape to have a chance to be character witnesses.)
(please sign up for which character you wish to play)
Rodney McKay:
Jeannie Miller:
John Sheppard: Peggy I might have to grow some balls for this role. I mean that metaphorically people.
Zelenka:
Agent Barrett:
Sam Carter:
Richard Woosely:
General Landry:
Wraith Todd:Originally posted by ReganX View PostWe've got our Sheppard. For other roles, maybe the prosecution and defence attorneys could each compile a witness list so we know who we'll need - no point in casting the role if the player won't have anything to do.
In the event that we run out of volunteers here and nobody's interested in doubling up (obviously, judge, defence and prosecution wouldn't be able to play a character too but there's no reason why whoever plays one character can't take on another if they so choose), we could issue open invitations on Character threads for anyone who has yet to be cast - ie. go to the McKay fans thread for McKay, and so on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pegasus_SGA View PostIf we don't get enough volunteers, I suppose I could always prosecute myself. Although I do wonder if people don't line up around the block to take pot shots at me. Well, this is their chance, so to speak.
Sig courtesy of RepliCartertje
Comment
-
Originally posted by ReganX View PostNot in my courtroom.
Originally posted by ReganX View PostDidn't Ranlier volunteer as lead prosecuter?
Comment
Comment