The Legend of King Arthur

[greytop]

Living in the US, we have a channel called the History Channel and today they have been having things about King Arthur.

The Quest for King Arthur talks about the legend and how it might have came about.

The show, History Vs. Hollywood, talks about the legend and how Hollywood precieves the legend of Arthur. They talk about mostly about the film, King Arthur.

[Bast]

Its not real history !

A more realistic Arthur would be a Celt Warlord who controls a large hill fort , Thwarted the saxxons by using the abandoned 300 year old roman roads , Guess what its in the 8th century not the late roman period 5th century but far after, Evidence shown the saxxons were walled for 30 years some force held them back , The suspect "the true warlord Celt leader Arthur".

The 2nd suspect for the real deal was a Roman general , The movie makers choosed him because he could look well groomed and fancy dressed, be almost a knight in shining armour.

The celtic one would be more like William Wallace of Brave heart, So it would be to much of a rip , Almost a prequeil if you think of it the Scottish ancestors vs the English ancestors.Celts lose and Brave Heart is payback!