Thank you Sonny for the info and link.
But I think that if most people were asked to define sci-fi that it would include what you are calling fantasy, and in my mind sci-fi is fantasy! Despite its use of scientific data to develop setting the setting themselves are merely extensions of fantasy upon which basis scientific information can be gleamed to justify elements of construct within the setting.
But as you said, the important point is continuity. To develop a storyline that breechs what is current science requires developing a regularity that either continues to affront current thought or logic or that reinforces the limitations that current science is saddled with. An illustration is in the Lawnmower Man movies where continuity is an extension of a disjuncted mind which in itself becomes the victim of its own irregularity.
While challenging the thought of current science may be difficult in light of publication restrictions or market specs
the success of such a storyline is entirely dependent upon the effective of the story, not on whether light is bent towards a gravitational field or away from it. If the story is enticing even with the use of nonhumanoid characters and is marketed successfully then publication issues are nominal.
So I continue to push towards nonlinear thought and away from the limitations that measurements and the interplay of physics and geometry make upon our sense of what we are.
What da . . . ? ? ?
But I think that if most people were asked to define sci-fi that it would include what you are calling fantasy, and in my mind sci-fi is fantasy! Despite its use of scientific data to develop setting the setting themselves are merely extensions of fantasy upon which basis scientific information can be gleamed to justify elements of construct within the setting.
But as you said, the important point is continuity. To develop a storyline that breechs what is current science requires developing a regularity that either continues to affront current thought or logic or that reinforces the limitations that current science is saddled with. An illustration is in the Lawnmower Man movies where continuity is an extension of a disjuncted mind which in itself becomes the victim of its own irregularity.
While challenging the thought of current science may be difficult in light of publication restrictions or market specs
the success of such a storyline is entirely dependent upon the effective of the story, not on whether light is bent towards a gravitational field or away from it. If the story is enticing even with the use of nonhumanoid characters and is marketed successfully then publication issues are nominal.
So I continue to push towards nonlinear thought and away from the limitations that measurements and the interplay of physics and geometry make upon our sense of what we are.
What da . . . ? ? ?
Comment