Originally posted by Morbo
Star Trek has certainly had a great run and if you want to argue the quantity over quality angle, you win. But Trek is a complete mess from a continuity and consistency basis. It is a generalized brand or franchise where anything goes. Scores of books and articles have been written on the inconsistencies alone.
Now if you are going to include movies there is a lot of science fiction better than any of the TV SciFi shows. If you limit the discussion to TV shows, I think Stargate SG-1 seasons 2-7 had better acting, better continuity and a more focused story apart from B-5 than any other TV Sc-Fi. B-5 had the best writing, but more uneven acting. Now if you try and identify even 4 seasons of Trek that had continuity, acting and story telling (all three in combination) even close to SG-1 or B-5, I'd like to know where it is.
The Trek arguement is the bulk arguement.
Star Wars is science fantasy.
Stargate wins. B5 second. Trek third.
Comment