Originally posted by Alan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Wedding of River Song (3213)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mi_guard View PostThank you Alan, that has been very kind of you. Looking forward to the special now
THE TARDIS DATA CORE - Encyclopaedia and reference site covering DOCTOR WHO, K-9 AND COMPANY, TORCHWOOD,THE SARAH JANE ADVENTURES,
K-9, CLASS and much more...
Comment
-
I think I just figured out one of the lines from the Silence that didnt really make sense.
When they said to Amy "You will bring the Silence" and "Your part will soon be over".
She did bring the Silence to the Doctor because it was her daughter (River) that killed him, so she effectively brought his silence, because as we learn from TWORS, it is his Silence they are referring to.
And also, her part will be over because they only needed the flesh Amy till the real Amy had had her baby, so thats why her part would soon be over.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Coco Pops View PostWell I'm the odd one out and thought most of the last season meh. Bar a few good episodes it was meh.Please do me a huge favour and help me be with the love of my life.
Comment
-
Just one question, a few months on.
On the beach the Doctor specifically mentions that he's 1103. But we know his "normal timeline" self is 908 or so. And we NOW know that 1103 version is in fact the Tesselecta with 908+months controlling it.
For the sake of my poor little brain - was he ever physically 1103 or was it just the Tesselecta talking. If so, why the ruse about the age?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Quizziard View PostJust one question, a few months on.
On the beach the Doctor specifically mentions that he's 1103. But we know his "normal timeline" self is 908 or so. And we NOW know that 1103 version is in fact the Tesselecta with 908+months controlling it.
For the sake of my poor little brain - was he ever physically 1103 or was it just the Tesselecta talking. If so, why the ruse about the age?
THE TARDIS DATA CORE - Encyclopaedia and reference site covering DOCTOR WHO, K-9 AND COMPANY, TORCHWOOD,THE SARAH JANE ADVENTURES,
K-9, CLASS and much more...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Crazedwraith View Post"Rule 1" - The Doctor lies.
At least I hope he was lying about his age there. 200 years of offscreen adventures is just pointless.
THE TARDIS DATA CORE - Encyclopaedia and reference site covering DOCTOR WHO, K-9 AND COMPANY, TORCHWOOD,THE SARAH JANE ADVENTURES,
K-9, CLASS and much more...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alan View PostNonsense. 200-years of off-screen companion-less adventures for the Doctor opens up a gap that can be filled by stories of any media - novel...audio...comic book...adventure game...fan fiction. Never, ever put a limitation on Doctor Who.
Originally posted by Crazedwraith View PostBook - comics -audio- fanfiction these things get written regardless of whether the tv show 'leaves room for them' or not.sigpic
Comment
-
I wonder if Moffat hangs out in opium dens when he's script writing for the series...
I know many of you liked it. I didn't really. It was too camp. It makes me miss the angsty 10th Doctor days.
But hey there were a few laughs. Live chess. Ha! And the Doctor's attempts at getting Amy and Rory to hook up.
And so we pick up a plot thread that was first introduced back in "Silence in the Library" with the Doctor's 'name'. Whilst it is certainly an intriguing idea, it really has very little 'weight' for me. I mean, so what, we find out his name is 'Bob'... OK, good for you.
I think the show suffers due to it being targeted at kids and families over adults. I can see why Davies decided to introduce an offshoot for an older audience with Torchwood.sigpic
Comment
Comment