Discussion about hot topics trending today

[Chaka-Z0]

But left-wing extremism is just fine, eh?

I see you don't believe in free speech. A belief in free speech requires that you allow ALL partys to speak, not just those that you agree with.

As Jel said, scarecrow on that strawman, but I'll answer nonetheless. If you could actually dig up some left-extremism band, I don't know maybe Mothers and Brothers of the Motherland, and make a case that they promote ''left-wing extremism'', whatever that is, then yea sure ban them too.

Hate speech is hate speech, speech that incite to violence, doesn't matter which side they should be banned as well. You also don't understand what free speech is about. If you stand up in the bus and start yelling like a maniac you'll be promptly escorted out, doesn't mean you didn't have the right to say what you said, it means you weren't allowed because you were NOT in a public environment, you're on company property.

Just admit it, you've lost on that one. Say that you're sorry and that we're right about this.
Say. My. Name.

[Annoyed]

As Jel said, scarecrow on that strawman, but I'll answer nonetheless. If you could actually dig up some left-extremism band, I don't know maybe Mothers and Brothers of the Motherland, and make a case that they promote ''left-wing extremism'', whatever that is, then yea sure ban them too.

Hate speech is hate speech, speech that incite to violence, doesn't matter which side they should be banned as well. You also don't understand what free speech is about. If you stand up in the bus and start yelling like a maniac you'll be promptly escorted out, doesn't mean you didn't have the right to say what you said, it means you weren't allowed because you were NOT in a public environment, you're on company property.

Just admit it, you've lost on that one. Say that you're sorry and that we're right about this.
Say. My. Name.

You say the right extremists are spouting off "hate speech".
Doesn't the Kindergartner and others of her ilk do the same thing? The target of their hate is the taxpayer; the guy who they expect foot the bill for their crap.

That isn't hate?

[SoulReaver]

You say the right extremists are spouting off "hate speech".
Doesn't the Kindergartner and others of her ilk do the same thing? The target of their hate is the taxpayer; the guy who they expect foot the bill for their crap.

That isn't hate?

cause GOP using taxes for corporate welfare instead, shows how much they like taxpayers?

[jelgate]

As Jel said, scarecrow on that strawman, but I'll answer nonetheless. If you could actually dig up some left-extremism band, I don't know maybe Mothers and Brothers of the Motherland, and make a case that they promote ''left-wing extremism'', whatever that is, then yea sure ban them too.

Hate speech is hate speech, speech that incite to violence, doesn't matter which side they should be banned as well. You also don't understand what free speech is about. If you stand up in the bus and start yelling like a maniac you'll be promptly escorted out, doesn't mean you didn't have the right to say what you said, it means you weren't allowed because you were NOT in a public environment, you're on company property.

Just admit it, you've lost on that one. Say that you're sorry and that we're right about this.
Say. My. Name.

When he starts moving goals, you know he is sorry

[Chaka-Z0]

You say the right extremists are spouting off "hate speech".
Doesn't the Kindergartner and others of her ilk do the same thing? The target of their hate is the taxpayer; the guy who they expect foot the bill for their crap.

That isn't hate?

It's hate if you believe it is, hate is subjective. I said Hate speech that incites to violence. As far as I know, only right-extremists have platforms that does just that, such as militias kidnapping and holding people hostage, racism, etc.

You're really trying hard to find a leg to stand on eh?

cause GOP using taxes for corporate welfare instead, shows how much they like taxpayers?

It's like the GOP'ers got clubbed in the head after Trump got elected and forgot all about his anti-establishment speeches, which the King is paying good coin to right now.

When he starts moving goals, you know he is sorry

He can be sorry all he wants, but moving goals is a punishable infraction under Hockey Law.

*Drops gloves*

[jelgate]

Slashing seems appropriate

[Annoyed]

It's hate if you believe it is, hate is subjective. I said Hate speech that incites to violence. As far as I know, only right-extremists have platforms that does just that, such as militias kidnapping and holding people hostage, racism, etc.

You're really trying hard to find a leg to stand on eh?

So the term "economic violence" as coined by various lefties is raw and utter BS, then?

The idea of Free Speech has good sturdy legs all it's own, thank you. I don't need to look for them.

All I'm saying is "Let everyone speak, and let the audience decide the value of what is said." You don't seem to believe in that.

You want to silence the views of those you disagree with. That's not free speech, dude.

[jelgate]

Yay, I can make another scarecrow

[Annoyed]

Yay, I can make another scarecrow

Lights a match and carelessly tosses it away.

[Gatefan1976]

You say the right extremists are spouting off "hate speech".
Doesn't the Kindergartner and others of her ilk do the same thing? The target of their hate is the taxpayer; the guy who they expect foot the bill for their crap.

That isn't hate?

No, it's not.
What motivates AOC?
What she wants will cost the taxpayer, that is true, but is she wanting to choose who bears that cost to her own advantage?
Is her proposal saying "if you oppose me, you get nothing"?
No.
The taxpayer, no matter who they are, get the benefit, weather they voted for it or not, because people in power should represent ALL, not just the "base".

She wants to ELEVATE the taxpayer, not damage them, even if it costs them. JFK asked "what can you do for your country", yet every argument you make is based on "what benefit is it to me"?
Can you not see how hypocritical that is?
You want the advancement, you just don't feel you should have to pay for it. Going to the moon, putting the money into NASA cost the taxpayer, and it did not help (at the time) the taxpayer (which even you were not at the time, or just starting to be)
JFK offered you hope, not just for you, but for all Americans, and you think he was one of your best presidents, party aside.
What hope does trump bring the NATION?

[Chaka-Z0]

You want to silence the views of those you disagree with. That's not free speech, dude.

Those people you speak of are terrorists. Are you joking? You want to let terrorists corrupt and recruit kids freely online?

[jelgate]

No, it's not.
What motivates AOC?
What she wants will cost the taxpayer, that is true, but is she wanting to choose who bears that cost to her own advantage?
Is her proposal saying "if you oppose me, you get nothing"?
No.
The taxpayer, no matter who they are, get the benefit, weather they voted for it or not, because people in power should represent ALL, not just the "base".

She wants to ELEVATE the taxpayer, not damage them, even if it costs them. JFK asked "what can you do for your country", yet every argument you make is based on "what benefit is it to me"?
Can you not see how hypocritical that is?
You want the advancement, you just don't feel you should have to pay for it. Going to the moon, putting the money into NASA cost the taxpayer, and it did not help (at the time) the taxpayer (which even you were not at the time, or just starting to be)
JFK offered you hope, not just for you, but for all Americans, and you think he was one of your best presidents, party aside.
What hope does trump bring the NATION?

I'll get your bacon

[Gatefan1976]

bout time you paid for it you lawn burning pain

[Annoyed]

Those people you speak of are terrorists. Are you joking? You want to let terrorists corrupt and recruit kids freely online?

Everyone should be allowed to speak.

As far as kids go, what have I suggested regarding them?

[Gatefan1976]

Everyone should be allowed to speak.

As far as kids go, what have I suggested regarding them?

Denying them rights?
That's exactly what you have proposed.
If you are under 18 or 21, you have no rights, unless you are in utero, in which case, you get rights.
You don't care about kids, you care about the abstract, and abstracts don't suffer, but kids do.