as of May 20, 2014
Note specifically Revelation 22:18-19 . . .
for M-G, track these links--
http://www.theopedia.com/Development_of_the_canon
This one (web page) contains a nice, neat chart to follow which books went into which version editions--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Testament
That is a good question I doNOT have the authority to answer one way or another. I used to believe in the Catholic version, until I read the Septuagint with the Apocrypha books placed separately. When I read the Septuagint version, I was not aware of the controversies about Martin Luther vs. the Vatican of Rome. Yeah, it got mentioned in a secular college course, but the info never sunk into my brain as being significantly important. I later read the Septuagint from a child's POV, free from clutter as if I had never heard of the Bible before.
Besides, in my Catholic upbringing years, I focused on Jesus' words in the Gospels and the prophecies mentioned in the book of Revelation. Anything else took a backseat -- it's there, but does it apply to me -- do I *really* need to know all that other stuff to gain entrance into "Jesus Christ's paradise kindgom"? The thief on the cross who asked Jesus to remember him, probably did not have the (Biblical) educational background that you and I have had. And yet, the thief was forgiven and is now there.. someone to meet and greet who has a thankful heart that on short notice, he didn't end up in that *other* place..!
People learning from the Septuagint books in the jungles don't know the difference, so is God going to hold the jungle folks against what they were told or hold the persons teaching them accountable to the very dots and T's being crossed in their sharing of any Bible information..?
again---m-g's quote in its entirety---
(Possible) answer--then by using Martin Luther's additional *word* as the ultimate standard, the Amplified Bible is heresy, null and void--even where it over-explains in the same passage what item "such and such" is because some thick-headed person just couldn't grasp the concept without it being over paraphrased 3 different ways.
No, I don't think that is what the verse in Revelation means (that is, reading the words in different paraphrases which still reach the same meaning or intent=ultimately, the same end goal).
I have met nit-picky Bible readers who prefer reading one translation over another, and they've even debated the whole translation issues, and it was finally agreed that the point isn't whose translation is the better, but which one is telling the truth in accordance to God's Holy Spirit, etc.
Removing books which were not supposedly *inspired* by God's own Holy Spirit would also have to apply to the 4 main historical versions used, and not just the 2 denominational differences between Catholics and Protestants--
Hebrew=24 books
Protestant/Septuagint=39 books
Catholic=46 books, and
Eastern Orthodox=51 books.
So then the next obvious question would be, which version is the absolute correct one?
If the Catholic version falls short of the Orthodox, then whoever compiled it and teaches it as the absolute final WORD of God will be subject to curses mentioned in Revelation 22:18-19. Same thing vice-versa, and so forth.
Originally posted by mad_gater
View Post
for M-G, track these links--
http://www.theopedia.com/Development_of_the_canon
This one (web page) contains a nice, neat chart to follow which books went into which version editions--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Testament
Originally posted by mad_gater
View Post
Besides, in my Catholic upbringing years, I focused on Jesus' words in the Gospels and the prophecies mentioned in the book of Revelation. Anything else took a backseat -- it's there, but does it apply to me -- do I *really* need to know all that other stuff to gain entrance into "Jesus Christ's paradise kindgom"? The thief on the cross who asked Jesus to remember him, probably did not have the (Biblical) educational background that you and I have had. And yet, the thief was forgiven and is now there.. someone to meet and greet who has a thankful heart that on short notice, he didn't end up in that *other* place..!
People learning from the Septuagint books in the jungles don't know the difference, so is God going to hold the jungle folks against what they were told or hold the persons teaching them accountable to the very dots and T's being crossed in their sharing of any Bible information..?
again---m-g's quote in its entirety---
Originally posted by mad_gater
View Post
No, I don't think that is what the verse in Revelation means (that is, reading the words in different paraphrases which still reach the same meaning or intent=ultimately, the same end goal).
I have met nit-picky Bible readers who prefer reading one translation over another, and they've even debated the whole translation issues, and it was finally agreed that the point isn't whose translation is the better, but which one is telling the truth in accordance to God's Holy Spirit, etc.
Originally posted by mad_gater
View Post
Hebrew=24 books
Protestant/Septuagint=39 books
Catholic=46 books, and
Eastern Orthodox=51 books.
So then the next obvious question would be, which version is the absolute correct one?
If the Catholic version falls short of the Orthodox, then whoever compiled it and teaches it as the absolute final WORD of God will be subject to curses mentioned in Revelation 22:18-19. Same thing vice-versa, and so forth.
Comment