Originally posted by squirrely1
View Post
Well I agree that love doesn't necessarily have to play a role in sex....but usually consensual sex in my mind anyway (and granted that could be very different than how most ppl think
) is when two people come together to engage in sex with both parties getting some emotional and physical benefit from it and it is "free" and not simply a business transaction.
I see prostitution as more of a "contract" rather than truly "consensual". Cuz to me it is a transaction in which one person is paying for a service and the other person is completely emotionally and probably physically (as much as possible) devoid from the activity only to do it just for money...while the other person gains some sort of satisfaction from it. This to me just seems wrong. I don't know if I am explaining myself adequately ....and if not...nevermind... I don't really want to debate this topic anymore.![Stick Out Tongue](https://forum.gateworld.net/core/images/smilies/../gw_smilies/tongue.gif)
It's not that I do not like the person...it's what that person stood for. The man is a known terrorist....he admitted on recordings that he was behind the 9/11 plot....non of those innocent people of 9/11 were given the benefit of a trial. He has also been seen talking on video recordings taking credit for his ongoing terror plots and admits he is the "leader" of the Al Qada group who is a known terrorist group that plot to kill innocent civilians. So really what more proof do you need?
Furthermore, we have made it clear and the US has announced our position that we are clearly "at war" on this type of terror. When you are at war....and you are facing a combatant ....you do not stop and give your "enemy" a trial. You shoot to save your life and bring down your enemy. Osama Bin Laden was a known enemy of the US and it was clear he was a combatant/war criminal. Additionally, it was reported that Bin Laden picked up a weapon and began shooting. He was not merely assassinated.
![Stick Out Tongue](https://forum.gateworld.net/core/images/smilies/../gw_smilies/tongue.gif)
I see prostitution as more of a "contract" rather than truly "consensual". Cuz to me it is a transaction in which one person is paying for a service and the other person is completely emotionally and probably physically (as much as possible) devoid from the activity only to do it just for money...while the other person gains some sort of satisfaction from it. This to me just seems wrong. I don't know if I am explaining myself adequately ....and if not...nevermind... I don't really want to debate this topic anymore.
![Stick Out Tongue](https://forum.gateworld.net/core/images/smilies/../gw_smilies/tongue.gif)
It's not that I do not like the person...it's what that person stood for. The man is a known terrorist....he admitted on recordings that he was behind the 9/11 plot....non of those innocent people of 9/11 were given the benefit of a trial. He has also been seen talking on video recordings taking credit for his ongoing terror plots and admits he is the "leader" of the Al Qada group who is a known terrorist group that plot to kill innocent civilians. So really what more proof do you need?
![Uncertain](https://forum.gateworld.net/core/images/smilies/../gw_smilies/uncertain.gif)
Are any Canadians here watching the elections?
Comment