The Political Discussion Thread

[jelgate]

I know this. To the sea

[Pharaoh Hamenthotep]

I know this. To the sea

For Science?

[jelgate]

Before dinosaurs, their was fish

[Annoyed]

We're going to feed PH to the fish?

[jelgate]

Works for me

[SGalisa]

Answer-- The chicken came with the eggshell. The eggshell is part of its protective birthing process. Chicken DNA came BEFORE the egg was formed to begin with, otherwise, there would be NO chicken NOR any egg or membrane that protects the chicken critter from the eggshell itself.

Ever look at a turtle? The shell is part of the turtle. Not the turtle hiding under a shell. The shell grows similar to human fingernails and toenails. Snails that have shells -- had those shells from genetic birth. The shell didn't suddenly show up or grow with each year the creature makes a new home in its shell-ring.

Bring in on the age-old question: which came first: the chicken or the egg?

I believe, the answer was the egg.

Of course it was. Chickens evolved relatively recently.

The earliest eggs were laid by creatures hundreds of millions of years ago.

Your science is a bit backwards there. Every chemist who has done the egg in vinegar experiment knows that the eggshell disappears into liquid calcium (and whatever else it is made of). What's left is the genetic DNA making up the chicken embryo. Eggshells don't suddenly produce chickens or reptiles or fish. The genetic code for the creature HAS to be there in order for the creature to mature into its pre-birth state.

Experiment to try---
"A naked egg is an egg without a shell"

Vitamin books recommend using vinegar to remove the calcium from eggs, so that it can be separated from the critter and the calcium from the shell can be turned into a mineral vitamin with the chicken egg-minus the shell used in some other version of cooking it.

Here is another website for dissolving eggshells reinforcement---
Home » Chemistry
"Raw Egg & Vinegar Experiments" By Casandra Maier

[Gatefan1976]

Is Obama tapping trump, or is trump "tapping" something else..................

[Coco Pops]

It has begun........

He's verbally threatening Congress

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/21/u...rump.html?_r=0

This should be interesting.

[garhkal]

Wow, wait... I thought IRS was taxes.
ICE is the one arresting immigrants, are they not?

This alphabet soup is confusing.

More like a funky fingering and not bothering to check myself..

[Pharaoh Hamenthotep]

Answer-- The chicken came with the eggshell. The eggshell is part of its protective birthing process. Chicken DNA came BEFORE the egg was formed to begin with, otherwise, there would be NO chicken NOR any egg or membrane that protects the chicken critter from the eggshell itself.

Ever look at a turtle? The shell is part of the turtle. Not the turtle hiding under a shell. The shell grows similar to human fingernails and toenails. Snails that have shells -- had those shells from genetic birth. The shell didn't suddenly show up or grow with each year the creature makes a new home in its shell-ring.



Your science is a bit backwards there. Every chemist who has done the egg in vinegar experiment knows that the eggshell disappears into liquid calcium (and whatever else it is made of). What's left is the genetic DNA making up the chicken embryo. Eggshells don't suddenly produce chickens or reptiles or fish. The genetic code for the creature HAS to be there in order for the creature to mature into its pre-birth state.

Experiment to try---
"A naked egg is an egg without a shell"

Vitamin books recommend using vinegar to remove the calcium from eggs, so that it can be separated from the critter and the calcium from the shell can be turned into a mineral vitamin with the chicken egg-minus the shell used in some other version of cooking it.

Here is another website for dissolving eggshells reinforcement---
Home » Chemistry
"Raw Egg & Vinegar Experiments" By Casandra Maier

Turtle shells are not the same thing as chicken eggs.. and the rest of it...

I don't even know where to start..

[Falcon Horus]

The dinosaurs

T-Rex

If that one had known where it was going to end... ...it would be the laughing stock of the community

because the "law" is ignorant of basic human anatomy and physiology

Define "human being"?

Answer-- The chicken came with the eggshell. The eggshell is part of its protective birthing process. Chicken DNA came BEFORE the egg was formed to begin with, otherwise, there would be NO chicken NOR any egg or membrane that protects the chicken critter from the eggshell itself.

No, really, the answer is the egg.

Somewhere a chicken ancestor (Gallus Gallus) laid an egg from which a Gallus Gallus Domesticus emerged.

So, the egg was first.

Here is another website for dissolving eggshells reinforcement---

MY GODDESS... ...why in the blazes would I want to dissolve eggshells at all?

It has begun.

It('s just evolving.

He's verbally threatening Congress
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/21/u...rump.html?_r=0

This should be interesting.

What? He can't do that. He's the President, after all, isn't he.
He has the power to rule!



Someone forgot to explain the rules probably or they couldn't dumb it down enough.

More like a funky fingering and not bothering to check myself..

Ah, ... nevertheless the alphabet soup is still confusing at times.

[Annoyed]

The law contradicts you.

because the "law" is ignorant of basic human anatomy and physiology

The "Law" has a good chance of getting changed before long, as the balance of the SCOTUS shifts to the right. Gorsuch's appointment to the court may be enough, but certainly the next judge Trump appoints will flip it.

[Pharaoh Hamenthotep]

T-Rex

If that one had known where it was going to end... ...it would be the laughing stock of the community

The T-Rex's little arms look weird because it's most often shown as reptilian, with scales..

But imagine it with feathers.. Have you ever seen a bird without it's feathers? And how small and pointless the wings look.

[Pharaoh Hamenthotep]

The "Law" has a good chance of getting changed before long, as the balance of the SCOTUS shifts to the right. Gorsuch's appointment to the court may be enough, but certainly the next judge Trump appoints will flip it.

And then you can celebrate when women start dying along with the unviable cell clusters it would be illegal to remove?

It's funny how the people fighting so hard in here to make abortion illegal in the name of "pro-life" are all single, childless men (and so misogynistic no woman would ever want to be in the same room as them). All Republican, in favour of more wars, and strongly support the death penalty. And in favour of cutting school funding and welfare.

How is it pro-life to only want someone to exist until the moment they're born? You fight so hard for them to enter the world and then turn your back on them the moment they're here, because "it's not your problem" and the mother "should have kept her pants on".

Explain the logic.

Are you pro-life or do you just have a major pregnancy fetish?

[Annoyed]

And then you can celebrate when women start dying along with the unviable cell clusters it would be illegal to remove?

It's funny how the people fighting so hard in here to make abortion illegal in the name of "pro-life" are all single, childless men (and so misogynistic no woman would ever want to be in the same room as them). All Republican, in favour of more wars, and strongly support the death penalty. And in favour of cutting school funding and welfare.

How is it pro-life to only want someone to exist until the moment they're born? You fight so hard for them to enter the world and then turn your back on them the moment they're here, because "it's not your problem" and the mother "should have kept her pants on".

Explain the logic.

Are you pro-life or do you just have a major pregnancy fetish?

I am "pro-responsible behavior."